SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

A trade

Created by: justaBoss
Team: 2020-21 San Jose Sharks
Initial Creation Date: Jan. 5, 2021
Published: Jan. 5, 2021
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
2$2,750,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
1$700,000
Trades
SJS
  1. Roslovic, Jack [RFA Rights]
  2. 2022 6th round pick (WPG)
WPG
  1. Blichfeld, Joachim
  2. Suomela, Antti
  3. 2022 2nd round pick (SJS)
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2021
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
2022
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the WPG
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the MIN
2023
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$81,500,000$73,840,000$0$277,500$7,660,000
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$7,000,000$7,000,000
LW, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$5,625,000$5,625,000
C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$4,725,000$4,725,000
RW, LW
UFA - 4
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$1,900,000$1,900,000
LW, C, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$8,000,000$8,000,000
C
M-NTC
UFA - 7
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$700,000$700,000
LW, C
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$3,000,000$3,000,000
LW, RW
UFA - 3
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$768,333$768,333 (Performance Bonus$65,000$65K)
LW, RW
RFA - 1
$2,750,000$2,750,000
C, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$700,000$700,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$750,000$750,000
C
UFA - 2
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$925,000$925,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$7,000,000$7,000,000
LD/RD
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$10,000,000$10,000,000
RD
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$5,750,000$5,750,000
G
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$2,250,000$2,250,000
LD/RD
UFA - 4
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$5,280,000$5,280,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$2,166,667$2,166,667
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$212,500$212K)
LD
UFA - 2
$700,000$700,000
LD
UFA
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$1,500,000$1,500,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$725,000$725,000
LD
UFA - 2
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$700,000$700,000
C
UFA - 1
Taxi Squad
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$925,000$925,000 ($0$0$0$0)
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$925,000$925,000 ($0$0$0$0) (Performance Bonus$212,500$212K)
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$836,667$836,667 ($0$0$0$0) (Performance Bonus$132,500$132K)
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$792,500$792,500 ($0$0$0$0) (Performance Bonus$132,500$132K)
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$763,333$763,333 ($0$0$0$0) (Performance Bonus$20,000$20K)
C, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$700,000$700,000 ($0$0$0$0)
LD
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Jan. 5, 2021 at 2:19 a.m.
#1
Go Sharks Go
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2021
Posts: 59
Likes: 23
would have to think that Roslovic would cost more
Jan. 5, 2021 at 3:15 a.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2020
Posts: 5,236
Likes: 2,875
Seems fair. If the Sharks were legitimately interested in Roslovic, I wouldn't mind paying this price.
Jan. 5, 2021 at 3:29 a.m.
#3
John Leonard Viewer
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2020
Posts: 1,325
Likes: 444
So for starters even as a Sharks fan I think a more legit prospect than Gallant would be needed. More importantly, with Donato and Roslovic you put patty on the 2nd lmaoooo
Jan. 5, 2021 at 11:27 a.m.
#4
Thread Starter
What in tarnation
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2017
Posts: 32,727
Likes: 31,454
Quoting: jfrojelin
So for starters even as a Sharks fan I think a more legit prospect than Gallant would be needed. More importantly, with Donato and Roslovic you put patty on the 2nd lmaoooo


Why not? Leafs put Thornton to first line LW. Give the guy every help he can get and he's a beneficial asset for you.
Jan. 5, 2021 at 6:20 p.m.
#5
Go Sharks Go
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2021
Posts: 59
Likes: 23
Quoting: RawZuccSauce420
Seems fair. If the Sharks were legitimately interested in Roslovic, I wouldn't mind paying this price.


really?

Gallant doesn't really have any value imo and Suomela is probably a 3rd line forward at best. So really the 2nd is the only real thing with value and Roslovic is worth more than that I think.
Jan. 5, 2021 at 6:46 p.m.
#6
Thread Starter
What in tarnation
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2017
Posts: 32,727
Likes: 31,454
Quoting: SalVulcano
really?

Gallant doesn't really have any value imo and Suomela is probably a 3rd line forward at best. So really the 2nd is the only real thing with value and Roslovic is worth more than that I think.


Point taken. I'll change the prospect.
Jan. 5, 2021 at 6:57 p.m.
#7
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 11,250
Likes: 4,677
Blichfeld is a talented guy who's ceiling is right around that of Roslovick IMO, and I don't want to give up a single pick in 2022 we need that draft to recoup top end talent.
with Roslo demanding a trade his value has plummeted, meaning we should be able to get him for a steal.
Blich 2021 3rd and one of our LD prospects should be more than enough.
otherwise I say we pass, Roslo wont be the difference between top 5 pick and playoffs
Jan. 5, 2021 at 7:29 p.m.
#8
Thread Starter
What in tarnation
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2017
Posts: 32,727
Likes: 31,454
Quoting: Rob32sjsharks
Blichfeld is a talented guy who's ceiling is right around that of Roslovick IMO, and I don't want to give up a single pick in 2022 we need that draft to recoup top end talent.
with Roslo demanding a trade his value has plummeted, meaning we should be able to get him for a steal.
Blich 2021 3rd and one of our LD prospects should be more than enough.
otherwise I say we pass, Roslo wont be the difference between top 5 pick and playoffs


I do agree. Hence it was originally Suomela+Gallant+2nd, but I got told that it's not enough, so I changed it to a better prospect.
Jan. 5, 2021 at 8:19 p.m.
#9
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 11,250
Likes: 4,677
Quoting: justaBoss
I do agree. Hence it was originally Suomela+Gallant+2nd, but I got told that it's not enough, so I changed it to a better prospect.

None of this prospects concern me as much as the 2nd.
I just don’t think he’s worth that haul. If I’m trading a first or 2nd I’d rather go after a guy like Strome in Chicago
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll