SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

COVID Protocol

Created by: DarthKane
Team: 2020-21 Chicago Blackhawks
Initial Creation Date: Jan. 25, 2021
Published: Jan. 26, 2021
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Retained Salary Transactions
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2021
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
2022
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
2023
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
22$81,500,000$63,008,814$1,090,244$3,482,500$18,491,186
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$1,000,000$1,000,000
C, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
C, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$2,625,000$2,625,000
RW
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$3,700,000$3,700,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$3,000,000$3,000,000
C
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$842,500$842,500 (Performance Bonus$82,500$82K)
LW, C, RW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$562,500$562,500
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$950,000$950,000
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$3,900,000$3,900,000
C, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$880,833$880,833
LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$1,000,000$1,000,000
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$1,000,000$1,000,000
RW, C
UFA - 2
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$5,538,462$5,538,462
LD
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$3,850,000$3,850,000
RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$800,000$800,000
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$4,550,000$4,550,000
LD/RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
RD
RFA - 3
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$850,000$850,000
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$3,200,000$3,200,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
LD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$1,000,000$1,000,000
G
UFA - 2
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$725,000$725,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$6,875,000$6,875,000
RD
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$10,500,000$10,500,000
C
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$3,250,000$3,250,000
LW, C
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$2,500,000$2M)
C, RW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$894,167$894,167 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
RD
RFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
RW, LW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$6,400,000$6,400,000
LW, RW
UFA - 3
Taxi Squad
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$880,833$880,833 ($0$0$0$0)
RW, C
RFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$863,333$863,333 ($0$0$0$0)
LD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$811,667$811,667 ($0$0$0$0) (Performance Bonus$82,500$82K)
LW, C
RFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$792,500$792,500 ($0$0$0$0) (Performance Bonus$82,500$82K)
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$775,000$775,000 ($0$0$0$0)
RW, LW
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Jan. 26, 2021 at 12:07 a.m.
#1
Chicago
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2015
Posts: 7,002
Likes: 2,852
It's amazing how there's 6 new faces (Included Shaw since he didn't play last season) in the forward group yet the 4th line is somehow the same as the Edmonton bubble. Mind boggling how considerably worse this team has gotten. Suter and Kurashev are good, but you can't replace Toews and Dach with the others.
Jan. 26, 2021 at 12:11 a.m.
#2
In Connor We Trust
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2020
Posts: 3,315
Likes: 2,080
Replace Shaw with Soderberg
Beaudin should be playing over Kalynuk
Jan. 26, 2021 at 12:15 a.m.
#3
Thread Starter
DarthKane
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2016
Posts: 832
Likes: 130
Quoting: NickC1988
It's amazing how there's 6 new faces (Included Shaw since he didn't play last season) in the forward group yet the 4th line is somehow the same as the Edmonton bubble. Mind boggling how considerably worse this team has gotten. Suter and Kurashev are good, but you can't replace Toews and Dach with the others.


Nobody is trying to replace Toews and Dach, JC is icing the best lineup he can with the players he has.

Without Toews, Dach and Nylander of course the team is worse.
ChiHawk liked this.
Jan. 26, 2021 at 12:15 a.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2017
Posts: 19,075
Likes: 9,394
Health not withstanding, Boqvist not being on the ice for a few games I think will actually help him. Debrincat though is a punch in the gut.
Jan. 26, 2021 at 12:16 a.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2017
Posts: 19,075
Likes: 9,394
Quoting: NickC1988
It's amazing how there's 6 new faces (Included Shaw since he didn't play last season) in the forward group yet the 4th line is somehow the same as the Edmonton bubble. Mind boggling how considerably worse this team has gotten. Suter and Kurashev are good, but you can't replace Toews and Dach with the others.


Except Hagel for Highmore. I think Highmore has been good but so far Hagel is a little bit better. They should be playing Hagel, Kampf and Higmore. Carps is not very valuable at this point and would rather see Hagel and Highmore being a high energy extremely fast forechecking nightmare with Kampf playing extremely good defense.
DarthKane liked this.
Jan. 26, 2021 at 6:24 p.m.
#6
Chicago
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2015
Posts: 7,002
Likes: 2,852
Quoting: DarthKane
Nobody is trying to replace Toews and Dach, JC is icing the best lineup he can with the players he has.

Without Toews, Dach and Nylander of course the team is worse.


I'm not saying they're trying to replace them, as obviously this team was on pace to take a step back by losing Crawford has taken multiple steps back due to injury. Not sure if he's truly icing the best line up at this point, the difference is probably so minuscule anyways.

Quoting: ChiHawk
Except Hagel for Highmore. I think Highmore has been good but so far Hagel is a little bit better. They should be playing Hagel, Kampf and Higmore. Carps is not very valuable at this point and would rather see Hagel and Highmore being a high energy extremely fast forechecking nightmare with Kampf playing extremely good defense.


I agree, no reason not to play the kids at this point. Your boy Carlsson is getting another crack tonight.
Jan. 26, 2021 at 9:45 p.m.
#7
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2017
Posts: 19,075
Likes: 9,394
Quoting: NickC1988
I'm not saying they're trying to replace them, as obviously this team was on pace to take a step back by losing Crawford has taken multiple steps back due to injury. Not sure if he's truly icing the best line up at this point, the difference is probably so minuscule anyways.



I agree, no reason not to play the kids at this point. Your boy Carlsson is getting another crack tonight.


I haven't liked Carlsson since the day we acquired him. He's strong defensively, but there is no reason we should have acquired a guy like that when we had guys in the system we could of groomed. Wallmark and Janmark are other guys unless we are unloading them for assets at the TDL. Janmark is the best of the 3 but again, we aren't really competing so why?
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll