SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Vancouver cap space

Created by: Tucson
Team: 2020-21 Chicago Blackhawks
Initial Creation Date: Mar. 5, 2021
Published: Mar. 5, 2021
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
Just a thought, VAN gets out from under a couple bad contracts cap-wise. Seabs ends up on LTIR in VAN.
Trades
CHI
  1. Beagle, Jay
  2. Eriksson, Loui
  3. 2021 3rd round pick (VAN)
  4. 2022 2nd round pick (VAN)
Retained Salary Transactions
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2021
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
2022
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
2023
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
25$81,500,000$57,783,814$1,090,244$2,632,500$23,716,186
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$6,400,000$6,400,000
LW, RW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$3,000,000$3,000,000
C
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$2,625,000$2,625,000
RW
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$3,700,000$3,700,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$842,500$842,500 (Performance Bonus$82,500$82K)
LW, C, RW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$880,833$880,833
LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$562,500$562,500
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$1,000,000$1,000,000
C, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
C, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$1,000,000$1,000,000
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$3,000,000$3,000,000
C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$1,000,000$1,000,000
RW, C
UFA - 2
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$5,538,462$5,538,462
LD
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$3,850,000$3,850,000
RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$1,000,000$1,000,000
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$4,550,000$4,550,000
LD/RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
RD
RFA - 3
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$850,000$850,000
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$3,200,000$3,200,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$894,167$894,167 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
RD
RFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$800,000$800,000
G
UFA - 2
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$6,000,000$6,000,000
LW, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$10,500,000$10,500,000
C
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$725,000$725,000
RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$3,900,000$3,900,000
C, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$950,000$950,000
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$3,250,000$3,250,000
LW, C
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$725,000$725,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$2,500,000$2M)
C, RW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
RW, LW
RFA - 1
Taxi Squad
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$825,833$825,833 ($0$0$0$0)
LW
RFA - 4
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$825,833$825,833 ($0$0$0$0) (Performance Bonus$82,500$82K)
C
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$743,333$743,333 ($0$0$0$0)
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$700,000$700,000 ($0$0$0$0)
G
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Mar. 5, 2021 at 5:23 p.m.
#1
exo2769
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2015
Posts: 15,806
Likes: 10,002
This doesn't make sense for the Hawks unless Podkolzin is coming to the Hawks.
Mar. 5, 2021 at 5:32 p.m.
#2
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2015
Posts: 60,098
Likes: 23,019
????? Makes no sense for the Hawks to take on 10m in bad contract. If Seabrook stays on LTIR his cap is meaningless to whatever team has him.
Mar. 5, 2021 at 6:06 p.m.
#3
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2020
Posts: 204
Likes: 127
Quoting: exo2769
This doesn't make sense for the Hawks unless Podkolzin is coming to the Hawks.


If Hawks are able to trade Seabs in some sort of move, it won't involve a true prospect coming back to them. They can take on a couple bad contracts for a year so VAN can have room to sign their young players. Meantime they won't have to worry about Seabs cap hit on LTIR.
Mar. 5, 2021 at 6:07 p.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 8,315
Likes: 4,966
If Seabs is ltir then why are we trading picks to take 10 mil on bad contracts? Vancouver adds not Chicago
exo2769 liked this.
Mar. 5, 2021 at 6:08 p.m.
#5
exo2769
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2015
Posts: 15,806
Likes: 10,002
Quoting: Tucson
If Hawks are able to trade Seabs in some sort of move, it won't involve a true prospect coming back to them. They can take on a couple bad contracts for a year so VAN can have room to sign their young players. Meantime they won't have to worry about Seabs cap hit on LTIR.


But there isn't an issues with him on LTIR. Truly, there are a lot of teams that actually WANT someone on LTIR because it allows the GM to have one more tool in negotiating with RFAs. It's what Dubas did in TOR with Clarkson and Horton.
Mar. 5, 2021 at 7:03 p.m.
#6
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2020
Posts: 204
Likes: 127
Quoting: exo2769
But there isn't an issues with him on LTIR. Truly, there are a lot of teams that actually WANT someone on LTIR because it allows the GM to have one more tool in negotiating with RFAs. It's what Dubas did in TOR with Clarkson and Horton.


Seabs deal is longer than both and it isn't the typical front loaded. They can keep Seabs and not have draft picks though. VAN gains cap space but spends more real dollars when fans aren't in stands while the rebuilding Hawks get a couple decent picks for carrying essentially 1 year of bad contracts.
exo2769 liked this.
Mar. 5, 2021 at 7:09 p.m.
#7
exo2769
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2015
Posts: 15,806
Likes: 10,002
Quoting: Tucson
Seabs deal is longer than both and it isn't the typical front loaded. They can keep Seabs and not have draft picks though. VAN gains cap space but spends more real dollars when fans aren't in stands while the rebuilding Hawks get a couple decent picks for carrying essentially 1 year of bad contracts.


They'll keep him. Submit it to insurance for reimbursement and have very little cap affects. Plus an extra tool for negotiating future RFAs.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll