No I really don't see why it would. I don't see what McCann does for the Wild at all. Would rather keep Hartman.

i see where you're coming from but when this team gets at least malkin back McCann can slot back into a normal role and be really effective. having bonino right now would be nice tho lol

I'm not sure this is a fit for either team. McCann having back to back 35 point seasons and pacing this year for 40 is good depth to have. Hartman is producing slightly lower than that so it really doesn't fit for Pittsburgh. Plus Bonino's contract doesn't look good anymore. He is really regressing after having a great season last year.

Wild aren't trading Ryan Hartman, & nick bonino for nothing. Like comical proposal

Ryan Hartman has been driving wild offense as a c

Nick bonino has been amazing on pk

So no from Minnesota

No chance wild are trading any players to Pittsburgh to help them

Huh? What are you talking about?

mcCann has 5 goals & 5 assists. Doesn't equate for 40points

So no it doesn't help wild.

Yes, in 18 games. Over the course of a regular 82 game season that is a 40+ point pace. Hartman's career high in points is 31 and he hasn't done that since the 17-18 season. Why would Pittsburgh trade McCann, who is coming off back to back 35 point seasons, for a guy who produces less and is a free agent this summer?