This is likely a huge no thank you on the Bruins part - I mean Jake scores are the same level of Conor - why would we move Jake and a 1st, Karson and Urho for basically the same production and player as Jake alone - makes no sense.

If you look at career stats then yes, they’re around the same rate. This year garland is far out pacing him and is in the top 10 for even strength points on a mediocre coyotes team. It’s pretty clear one asset is ascending and one is descending. You also have to look at the fact that garland isn’t even necessarily for sale, so the price will be high. If the bruins bring him home, expect it to be around this price tag

Given the age of the players - its hard to definitively say one is ascending and one is descending - I mean both players are what 25 - so one off season means it bad and on way down? As it pertains to the Yotes setting the price high, by all means that is their choice - all I am saying that the Bruins would be stupid to pay this for the same player in return. The yotes can try to sell him another team for that price point.