SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Trade Machine Proposals

Apple Jacks

Created by: Talonz
Published: May 6, 2021 at 8:19 p.m.
Salary Cap: $81,500,000
Season Days: 27/116 (23%)
Central Registry Determination: This trade has met the central registry's trade checklist

Logo of the Buffalo SabresBuffalo Sabres

Trade occurred while using LTIR
LTIR Relief: $2,200,000
LTIR Used Prior to Trade: -$1,599,210
OutStatusRetained SalaryEffective Cap HitRosterSPCReserve ListDraft Rd 1Rd 2-3Rd 4-7GPGAPGAASv%
Eichel, JackBuffalo SabresIR-$10,000,000011---0000--
InStatusRetained SalaryEffective Cap HitRosterSPCReserve ListDraft Rd 1Rd 2-3Rd 4-7GPGAPGAASv%
Strome, RyanNew York RangersNHL-$4,500,000111---0000--
Deangelo, AnthonyNew York RangersTaxi Squad-$0011---0000--
Kakko, KaapoWaivers ExemptNew York RangersNHL-$925,000111---0000--
Schneider, BradenWaivers ExemptNew York RangersMinor-$0011---0000--
2021 1st round pick (Logo of the New York RangersNYR)---100------
2021 3rd round pick (Logo of the Buffalo SabresBUF)---010------
ChangeCap SpaceRosterSPCReserve ListDraft Rd 1Rd 2-3Rd 4-7GPGAPGAASv%
Initial$3,799,2102843583812
Change$8,300,000233110
Final$12,099,210 (↑)30 (↑)46 (↑)61 (↑)4 (↑)9 (↑)12000

Logo of the New York RangersNew York Rangers

OutStatusRetained SalaryEffective Cap HitRosterSPCReserve ListDraft Rd 1Rd 2-3Rd 4-7GPGAPGAASv%
Strome, RyanNew York RangersNHL-$1,047,413111---0000--
Deangelo, AnthonyNew York RangersTaxi Squad-$867,025011---0000--
Kakko, KaapoWaivers ExemptNew York RangersNHL-$215,301111---0000--
Schneider, BradenWaivers ExemptNew York RangersMinor-$0011---0000--
2021 1st round pick (Logo of the New York RangersNYR)---100------
2021 3rd round pick (Logo of the Buffalo SabresBUF)---010------
InStatusRetained SalaryEffective Cap HitRosterSPCReserve ListDraft Rd 1Rd 2-3Rd 4-7GPGAPGAASv%
Eichel, JackBuffalo SabresIR-$2,327,586011---0000--
ChangeCap SpaceRosterSPCReserve ListDraft Rd 1Rd 2-3Rd 4-7GPGAPGAASv%
Initial$5,498,6202645623614
Change-$197,847-2-3-3-1-10
Final$5,300,773 (↓)24 (↓)42 (↓)59 (↓)2 (↓)5 (↓)14000
May 6, 2021 at 8:24 p.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2021
Posts: 6,609
Likes: 4,753
BUF should take this and run
Tntpod liked this.
May 6, 2021 at 10:24 p.m.
#2
I make Articals.
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2021
Posts: 1,129
Likes: 368
Quoting: Dutchies
BUF should take this and run


Imagine this happens
May 7, 2021 at 8:44 a.m.
#3
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2021
Posts: 14,017
Likes: 4,585
Strome isn’t much of anything. Deangelo is negative value.
So it’s the prospect you’ve realized isnt’ that good, Schneider, a 1st, and a 3rd....that ain’t it.
May 7, 2021 at 1:07 p.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 370
Likes: 138
Quoting: CMcAvoy73
Strome isn’t much of anything. Deangelo is negative value.
So it’s the prospect you’ve realized isnt’ that good, Schneider, a 1st, and a 3rd....that ain’t it.


strome is almost a point per game this year
May 7, 2021 at 4:49 p.m.
#5
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2021
Posts: 14,017
Likes: 4,585
Quoting: Igoat_Shesterkin
strome is almost a point per game this year


No he isn’t.
May 8, 2021 at 10:51 p.m.
#6
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2019
Posts: 21
Likes: 4
Quoting: CMcAvoy73
No he isn’t.


49 points in 56 games. Simple math says that’s .875/1, That’s pretty close and actually a higher percentage than Eichel this year.
May 8, 2021 at 11:18 p.m.
#7
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2021
Posts: 14,017
Likes: 4,585
Quoting: RangersLeadTheWay
49 points in 56 games. Simple math says that’s .875/1, That’s pretty close and actually a higher percentage than Eichel this year.


Thats not point per game.

Strome is also a career a .55 point per game player over his career. If strome puts in another year like this, maybe I’ll believe it. Until then, I’m going to take his career rather than a 50 game stretch producing with panarin. A good 50 game stretch for point production happens all the time, especially when a player is put in a situation conducive to putting up points. Let’s see him maintain this, not quite point per game rate, over a longer period.
May 10, 2021 at 12:45 p.m.
#8
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2019
Posts: 21
Likes: 4
Quoting: CMcAvoy73
Thats not point per game.

Strome is also a career a .55 point per game player over his career. If strome puts in another year like this, maybe I’ll believe it. Until then, I’m going to take his career
rather than a 50 game stretch producing with panarin. A good 50 game stretch for point production happens all the time, especially when a player is put in a situation conducive to putting up points. Let’s see him maintain this, not quite point per game rate, over a longer period.


No one said he was a point per game player, but that he’s close to it. I largely agree with a lot of your points and definitely think he needs another similar year to cement his trade value, but I do think Strome has turned his career around since joining the Rangers and it’s not 100% to do with Panarin as he still had 11 points in the 14 games Panarin was out, which is amongst the top point production in the league for 2nd line centers this season.

My point is that Strome has developed a significant amount of trade value since he was acquired for Ryan Spooner and isn’t an insignificant piece in a package for anyone anymore. Whether a team wants to take that risk without another year of similar production or the fact that he only has one year left on his contract is a different story, but Eichel has major risks as well at a much higher price tag.

Obviously, Eichel is the more talented player and with no other factors you build around him before Strome, but the production and skill aren’t so far apart that I would risk adding several other major pieces like Kappo, Schneider and high drafts in a deal to replace Strome with Eichel. Are the Rangers a better team with Zibenjad and Eichel down the middle than with Strome -absolutely, but it doesn’t add leadership, toughness, defensive responsibility, or help in the face off circle and that’s what the Rangers need down the middle the most. For the price of adding the elite skill Eichel provides in addition to the Skill the team already has in bunches I don’t think they are a better team. The cost at this price is just too high and there are much better fits than Eichel for the Rangers for equal or less value than this deal.

I’d rather target a Bo Horvat, Hintz, Kopitar, or even adding getzlaf for a season or two before I break the bank to add Eichel. The only thing making this plausible is James Dolan and that’s the scariest thing for Ranger fans.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll