SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Youth Probably Unrealistic

Created by: NoVaSpartan
Team: 2021-22 Anaheim Ducks
Initial Creation Date: May 13, 2021
Published: May 18, 2021
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
I'm not an Anaheim pro so take that as you will.
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
1$2,500,000
2$1,500,000
1$1,000,000
1$1,000,000
1$1,500,000
1$1,000,000
1$1,000,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
1$925,000
1$1,500,000
4$4,000,000
CREATEDYEARSCAP HIT
Beniers, Matthew
3$925,000
Trades
1.
ANA
    Expansion Draft
    2.
    ANA
    1. Chytil, Filip [RFA Rights]
    2. Deangelo, Anthony
    3. 2021 3rd round pick (BUF)
    4. 2022 2nd round pick (NYR)
    NYR
    1. Rakell, Rickard
    Additional Details:
    Anaheim buys out Deangelo
    3.
    ANA
    1. 2022 1st round pick (MIN)
    MIN
    1. Henrique, Adam ($2,900,000 retained)
    4.
    WSH
    1. 2022 1st round pick (ANA)
    2. 2022 2nd round pick (NYR)
    5.
    ANA
    1. 2022 2nd round pick (NSH)
    Buyouts
    Retained Salary Transactions
    DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
    2021
    Logo of the ANA
    Logo of the ANA
    Logo of the ANA
    Logo of the BUF
    Logo of the ANA
    Logo of the ANA
    Logo of the EDM
    Logo of the ANA
    2022
    Logo of the MIN
    Logo of the ANA
    Logo of the NSH
    Logo of the ANA
    Logo of the ANA
    Logo of the ANA
    Logo of the TOR
    Logo of the NSH
    2023
    Logo of the ANA
    Logo of the ANA
    Logo of the ANA
    Logo of the ANA
    Logo of the ANA
    Logo of the ANA
    ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
    23$81,500,000$59,111,112$0$1,700,000$22,388,888
    Left WingCentreRight Wing
    Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
    $1,700,000$1,700,000
    LW, RW
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Washington Capitals
    $3,900,000$3,900,000
    C
    M-NTC
    UFA - 4
    Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
    $5,250,000$5,250,000
    RW, LW
    M-NTC
    UFA - 3
    Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
    $1,500,000$1,500,000
    LW, RW
    UFA - 1
    $4,000,000$4,000,000
    C
    UFA - 6
    Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
    $1,000,000$1,000,000
    LW, RW
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
    $1,000,000$1,000,000
    C, LW
    RFA - 1
    Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
    $925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
    C, LW
    RFA - 2
    Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
    $1,000,000$1,000,000
    LW, RW
    RFA - 3
    Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
    $2,500,000$2,500,000
    LW
    RFA - 2
    Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
    $1,450,000$1,450,000
    RW
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
    $1,000,000$1,000,000
    LW, RW
    UFA - 1
    Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
    Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
    $2,602,778$2,602,778
    LD
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
    $2,050,000$2,050,000
    RD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
    $6,400,000$6,400,000
    G
    M-NTC
    UFA - 6
    Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
    $6,500,000$6,500,000
    LD/RD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 5
    Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
    $3,900,000$3,900,000
    RD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 2
    $1,500,000$1,500,000
    G
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
    $1,300,000$1,300,000
    LD/RD
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
    $925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
    RD
    RFA - 2
    ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
    Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
    $1,500,000$1,500,000
    C, LW
    RFA - 1
    Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
    $6,875,000$6,875,000
    C, RW
    M-NTC
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
    $1,000,000$1,000,000
    LD/RD
    RFA - 2
    Beniers, Matthew
    $925,000$925,000
    Taxi Squad
    Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
    $925,000$925,000 ($0$0$0$0)
    C, LW, RW
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
    $800,000$800,000 ($0$0$0$0)
    LD
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
    $950,000$950,000 ($0$0$0$0)
    G
    UFA - 2

    Embed Code

    • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
    • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

    Text-Embed

    Click to Highlight
    May 18, 2021 at 10:06 a.m.
    #1
    Kravtsov_Stan
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Sep. 2020
    Posts: 1,686
    Likes: 655
    doesn't make much sense for the Rangers to trade for Rackell, especially to trade a center prospect for him
    OldNYIfan liked this.
    May 18, 2021 at 10:06 a.m.
    #2
    Servant of Chaos
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jan. 2016
    Posts: 1,113
    Likes: 455
    Rangers don't need a rental winger. They have too many wingers as is
    OldNYIfan liked this.
    May 18, 2021 at 10:47 a.m.
    #3
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Apr. 2021
    Posts: 657
    Likes: 352
    We shouldn’t be trading any 1st round picks during a rebuild.
    Don’t think Rangers accept
    Minnesota could bite on that depending how they do next year at the TDL
    I’d only sign Danault if Getzlaf retires AND Henrique is taken by Seattle
    Grant isn’t worth a second

    Sorry for nitpicking
    OldNYIfan and NoVaSpartan liked this.
    May 18, 2021 at 10:57 a.m.
    #4
    Once a Kings Fan Too
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jun. 2018
    Posts: 40,978
    Likes: 25,773
    As another Anaheim guy (like @QuackAttack), I don't think the Rangers do that even to get rid of DeAngelo. At best, the second is overkill.

    I don't think that Henrique's trade value is that high, but Minnesota are looking for a #2 C.

    Once you sign Danault, I don't think that Kuznetsov fits our financial structure or needs.

    Grant indeed isn't worth more than a fourth.

    Anthony Stolarz looks like a perfectly acceptable backup to John Gibson, at least until he proves he isn't.

    Thanks for trying out our team! For a guy who isn't familiar with us, you did a pretty good job.
    QuackAttack and NoVaSpartan liked this.
    May 18, 2021 at 11:36 a.m.
    #5
    Banned
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Feb. 2021
    Posts: 813
    Likes: 142
    This trade is not realistic or reality. Henrique is a bad player with trash contract who suckered. The guy was put on waivers, & no team claimed him

    How people here thinks wild will trade a 1st round pick, much less any pick for henrique is just not feasible
    May 18, 2021 at 11:38 a.m.
    #6
    Banned
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Feb. 2021
    Posts: 813
    Likes: 142
    Quoting: FreeTacosAreBestTacos
    Rangers don't need a rental winger. They have too many wingers as is


    Quoting: QuackAttack
    We shouldn’t be trading any 1st round picks during a rebuild.
    Don’t think Rangers accept
    Minnesota could bite on that depending how they do next year at the TDL
    I’d only sign Danault if Getzlaf retires AND Henrique is taken by Seattle
    Grant isn’t worth a second

    Sorry for nitpicking


    No, Minnesota wild won't. Adam henrique has a really bad trash contract to the point wild won't even have cap

    Adam henrique is a negative asset and contract

    Nobody specifically especially wild are giving up a 2022 1st round pick, or any 1st round pick for him
    May 18, 2021 at 11:42 a.m.
    #7
    Thread Starter
    Craig Laughlin Fan
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Nov. 2019
    Posts: 5,322
    Likes: 5,746
    Quoting: BrodinCheerD
    No, Minnesota wild won't. Adam henrique has a really bad trash contract to the point wild won't even have cap

    Adam henrique is a negative asset and contract

    Nobody specifically especially wild are giving up a 2022 1st round pick, or any 1st round pick for him


    The first is there because Anaheim is eating half his salary, but in hindsight a 2023 1st round pick could be better for Minnesota. Henrique had a bad year but could very well bounce back, especially with a good team like the WIld and would slot in well at the #2 C position.
    OldNYIfan liked this.
    May 18, 2021 at 11:45 a.m.
    #8
    Banned
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Feb. 2021
    Posts: 813
    Likes: 142
    Quoting: NoVaSpartan
    The first is there because Anaheim is eating half his salary, but in hindsight a 2023 1st round pick could be better for Minnesota. Henrique had a bad year but could very well bounce back, especially with a good team like the WIld and would slot in well at the #2 C position.


    Wild will have zero cap room or space room after signing kaprizov, Joel Eriksson Ek, & fiala long term
    May 18, 2021 at 12:48 p.m.
    #9
    Thread Starter
    Craig Laughlin Fan
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Nov. 2019
    Posts: 5,322
    Likes: 5,746
    Quoting: QuackAttack
    We shouldn’t be trading any 1st round picks during a rebuild.
    Don’t think Rangers accept
    Minnesota could bite on that depending how they do next year at the TDL
    I’d only sign Danault if Getzlaf retires AND Henrique is taken by Seattle
    Grant isn’t worth a second

    Sorry for nitpicking


    Quoting: OldNYIfan
    As another Anaheim guy (like QuackAttack), I don't think the Rangers do that even to get rid of DeAngelo. At best, the second is overkill.

    I don't think that Henrique's trade value is that high, but Minnesota are looking for a #2 C.

    Once you sign Danault, I don't think that Kuznetsov fits our financial structure or needs.

    Grant indeed isn't worth more than a fourth.

    Anthony Stolarz looks like a perfectly acceptable backup to John Gibson, at least until he proves he isn't.

    Thanks for trying out our team! For a guy who isn't familiar with us, you did a pretty good job.


    Thanks for the feedback!
    I wasnt sure how much Grant was worth, but I saw the contract and guessed from there.
    I agree that Kuznetsov may not fit, but I think its a worthwhile risk as long as you have picks still in the pocket, as Kuznetsov has a lot of upside as long as he gets his act together. Looking back, I think trading the Minnesota pick to Washington instead would have been smarter.
    I hope this wasn't TOO terrible of a AGM team smile
    OldNYIfan liked this.
    May 18, 2021 at 12:51 p.m.
    #10
    Thread Starter
    Craig Laughlin Fan
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Nov. 2019
    Posts: 5,322
    Likes: 5,746
    Quoting: BrodinCheerD
    Wild will have zero cap room or space room after signing kaprizov, Joel Eriksson Ek, & fiala long term


    They'll probably lose a player with decent cap in the expansion, and Henrique is worth the price as long as he bounces back. Then you have a 2C locked up at 3 mil for the next 3 years. They can find other ways to clear cap space, I think that take is an overreaction.
    OldNYIfan liked this.
    May 18, 2021 at 1:46 p.m.
    #11
    Banned
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Feb. 2021
    Posts: 813
    Likes: 142
    Quoting: NoVaSpartan
    They'll probably lose a player with decent cap in the expansion, and Henrique is worth the price as long as he bounces back. Then you have a 2C locked up at 3 mil for the next 3 years. They can find other ways to clear cap space, I think that take is an overreaction.


    No it's not. If they lose soucy like rumored, that's only 3 million

    Where is the room for Adam henrique who has a trash contract going to fit over Joel Eriksson Ek, Marco rossi, nick sturm, & nick bonino or nick bjustad

    1-2c, Marco rossi, Joel Eriksson Ek
    1-2c: Marco rossi, Joel Eriksson Ek
    3c: nico sturm
    4c: nick bonino, or nick bjustad

    Then wild have c prospects
    Marat Khusnutdinov
    Alexander khovanov

    Two 1at round pick this year

    Wild aren't trading for older players, & trash contract over their young guys
    May 18, 2021 at 2:30 p.m.
    #12
    Thread Starter
    Craig Laughlin Fan
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Nov. 2019
    Posts: 5,322
    Likes: 5,746
    Quoting: BrodinCheerD
    No it's not. If they lose soucy like rumored, that's only 3 million

    Where is the room for Adam henrique who has a trash contract going to fit over Joel Eriksson Ek, Marco rossi, nick sturm, & nick bonino or nick bjustad

    1-2c, Marco rossi, Joel Eriksson Ek
    1-2c: Marco rossi, Joel Eriksson Ek
    3c: nico sturm
    4c: nick bonino, or nick bjustad

    Then wild have c prospects
    Marat Khusnutdinov
    Alexander khovanov

    Two 1at round pick this year

    Wild aren't trading for older players, & trash contract over their young guys


    No reason to rush Rossi up next year, before he is ready, and Henrique helps with that. Henrique is also flexible and could play wing. Since its 3 years at a reasonable rate they don't have to keep him around for multiple years, and if he bounces back the Wild could flip him for more. Its a good stopgap so that they don't rush up prospects. Henrique at 3 mil isn't a trash contract by any means and the 1st round pick will be late in the first round. And Henrique is only 31, o its reasonable to assume he bounces back, and isn't incredibly old. It's really not bad, and there is still reasonable out options.
     
    Reply
    To create a post please Login or Register
    Question:
    Options:
    Add Option
    Submit Poll