SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Seth

Created by: FlamesNutt
Team: 2021-22 Calgary Flames
Initial Creation Date: Jun. 2, 2021
Published: Jun. 3, 2021
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Free Agent Signings
RESERVE LISTYEARSCAP HIT
3$850,000
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
2$2,500,000
1$750,000
1$925,000
1$925,000
1$750,000
1$1,250,000
1$750,000
1$750,000
1$925,000
1$750,000
1$925,000
1$850,000
1$925,000
2$850,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
1$750,000
1$925,000
2$1,500,000
5$4,000,000
Trades
1.
CGY
  1. Foudy, Liam
  2. Jones, Seth
  3. 2021 4th round pick (CBJ)
Additional Details:
JONES SIGNS EXTENSION
CBJ
  1. Andersson, Rasmus
  2. Monahan, Sean
  3. 2021 2nd round pick (CGY)
  4. 2022 1st round pick (CGY)
2.
CGY
SEA
  1. Giordano, Mark
Additional Details:
EXPANSION DRAFT PICK
3.
CGY
  1. Gostisbehere, Shayne
  2. Konecny, Travis
  3. Twarynski, Carsen [RFA Rights]
  4. 2021 2nd round pick (PHI)
  5. 2022 1st round pick (PHI)
PHI
  1. Gaudreau, Johnny
  2. Kylington, Oliver
  3. 2022 2nd round pick (FLA)
Buyouts
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2021
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the PHI
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the CBJ
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
2022
Logo of the PHI
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
2023
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$81,500,000$66,033,333$0$415,000$15,466,667
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$2,425,000$2,425,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$4,850,000$4,850,000
C, RW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$2,500,000$2,500,000
LW, RW, C
RFA - 3
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$7,000,000$7,000,000
RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Columbus Blue Jackets
$894,167$894,167 (Performance Bonus$400,000$400K)
LW, C
RFA - 1
Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
$5,500,000$5,500,000
RW, LW
UFA - 4
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$750,000$750,000
LW, RW
UFA
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$5,350,000$5,350,000
C
M-NTC
UFA - 3
$4,000,000$4,000,000
RW, LW
UFA - 7
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$5,250,000$5,250,000
LW, RW
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$750,000$750,000
C, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$925,000$925,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$1,237,500$1,237,500
LD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Columbus Blue Jackets
$5,400,000$5,400,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$6,000,000$6,000,000
G
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
$4,500,000$4,500,000
LD/RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$1,125,000$1,125,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$1,250,000$1,250,000
LD
RFA - 2
$1,500,000$1,500,000
RD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$750,000$750,000
G
UFA
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$801,666$801,666 (Performance Bonus$15,000$15K)
LW, C
UFA - 1
$850,000$850,000
LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$925,000$925,000
LD
UFA - 2

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Jun. 3, 2021 at 4:42 p.m.
#1
GO FLAMES GO
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2020
Posts: 18,465
Likes: 10,762
Id rather have Andersson. Him and Hanifin already have Chemistry in the chance they have 1st pair next year. I don't think we need Seth
flamesfan liked this.
Jun. 3, 2021 at 4:45 p.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2020
Posts: 2,093
Likes: 1,255
Philly declines.
FlamesNutt liked this.
Jun. 3, 2021 at 4:46 p.m.
#3
Thread Starter
In Sutter We Trust?
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2021
Posts: 38
Likes: 9
Quoting: Gmonwy
Id rather have Andersson. Him and Hanifin already have Chemistry in the chance they have 1st pair next year. I don't think we need Seth


In this scenario the Flames lose Giordano to Seattle in the Expansion Draft, that's a gaping hole to fill.
Jun. 3, 2021 at 4:46 p.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2019
Posts: 2,088
Likes: 686
That gaudreau trade is terrible for calgary, the flames very easily decline and the Columbus trade is also terrible for calgary, so that flames very very easily decline both
Jun. 3, 2021 at 4:46 p.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2019
Posts: 2,088
Likes: 686
Quoting: FlamesNutt
In this scenario the Flames lose Giordano to Seattle in the Expansion Draft, that's a gaping hole to fill.


Not really and Jones is a rd
Jun. 3, 2021 at 4:47 p.m.
#6
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2019
Posts: 2,088
Likes: 686
Quoting: HikinenNisti
Philly declines.


Calgary also very easily declines
Jun. 3, 2021 at 5:05 p.m.
#7
Thread Starter
In Sutter We Trust?
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2021
Posts: 38
Likes: 9
Quoting: flamesfan
Not really and Jones is a rd


So what you're saying is that losing your #1 dman who also happens to be your captain on a non-playoff team is 'not really' a gaping hole?

Who do you see taking Gio' 23 minutes a game?
Jun. 3, 2021 at 5:10 p.m.
#8
Thread Starter
In Sutter We Trust?
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2021
Posts: 38
Likes: 9
Quoting: flamesfan
That gaudreau trade is terrible for calgary, the flames very easily decline and the Columbus trade is also terrible for calgary, so that flames very very easily decline both


Considering you traded Monahan, retained $3M, for Newhook and two 3rd round picks. I'm not exactly worried about your opinion.
Jun. 3, 2021 at 5:45 p.m.
#9
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 9,527
Likes: 8,968
Quoting: FlamesNutt
So what you're saying is that losing your #1 dman who also happens to be your captain on a non-playoff team is 'not really' a gaping hole?

Who do you see taking Gio' 23 minutes a game?

Yeah it’s not really a gaping hole. Hanifin will take on more minutes and the role of the team’s best D, he already was this year. Valimaki will get a look in the top 4 but I imagine we bring in a 4/5 guy (like de Haan from Chicago or something) to support that. Gio will be phased out fairly easily I’d imagine.
Jun. 3, 2021 at 6:02 p.m.
#10
Thread Starter
In Sutter We Trust?
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2021
Posts: 38
Likes: 9
Quoting: Alfie11
Yeah it’s not really a gaping hole. Hanifin will take on more minutes and the role of the team’s best D, he already was this year. Valimaki will get a look in the top 4 but I imagine we bring in a 4/5 guy (like de Haan from Chicago or something) to support that. Gio will be phased out fairly easily I’d imagine.


So Valimaki goes from being a healthy scratch for a number of games to being in the Flames top 4? And somehow this is going to move the team forward?

'Gio will be phased out fairly easily I'd imagine' is usually what coaches, GMs and scouts alike say about #1 dmen.

Any chance you can let me know which strain of weed you're smoking?
Jun. 3, 2021 at 7:52 p.m.
#11
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2019
Posts: 2,088
Likes: 686
Quoting: FlamesNutt
So what you're saying is that losing your #1 dman who also happens to be your captain on a non-playoff team is 'not really' a gaping hole?

Who do you see taking Gio' 23 minutes a game?


Gio was at best the 3rd best defensmen this year hanifin and Tanev were both way better and andersson was as good if not better this year, valimaki can easily do what gio does
Jun. 3, 2021 at 7:53 p.m.
#12
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2019
Posts: 2,088
Likes: 686
Quoting: FlamesNutt
Considering you traded Monahan, retained $3M, for Newhook and two 3rd round picks. I'm not exactly worried about your opinion.


Good thing I don’t care about yours either
Jun. 4, 2021 at 9:52 a.m.
#13
Thread Starter
In Sutter We Trust?
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2021
Posts: 38
Likes: 9
Quoting: flamesfan
Gio was at best the 3rd best defensmen this year hanifin and Tanev were both way better and andersson was as good if not better this year, valimaki can easily do what gio does


ROFLMAO
Jun. 4, 2021 at 2:57 p.m.
#14
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2019
Posts: 2,088
Likes: 686
Quoting: FlamesNutt
ROFLMAO


So you think gio was better than hanifin and Tanev?
Jun. 4, 2021 at 5:55 p.m.
#15
Thread Starter
In Sutter We Trust?
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2021
Posts: 38
Likes: 9
Quoting: flamesfan
So you think gio was better than hanifin and Tanev?


Do I "think" Giordano was better than Hanifin and Tanev individually this past season? Yes. But that's merely my personal opinion.

So...let's take a look at the stats.

Giordano led the teams defense in the following statistical categories, Goals, Assists, Points, Shots on Goal, Shooting %, GWG, PPG, Hits, Blocked Shots and Time On Ice

Tanev led the teams defense in +/- and SH Time On Ice with 3:07 per game followed closely by Girodano at 3:03 per game.

Hanifin DID NOT lead the team in a single statistical category, he did however have more PIMs than Giordano. 18 to 14.

Now some may argue that Tanev is a better defender than Giordano and that's a valid discussion, but Tanev definitely isn't a better all around defensemen as he doesn't skate as well as Gio, nor does he have the offensive upside. This is backed up by the fact that Tanev averaged 12 SECONDS of PP Time On Ice.

Hanifin makes a great partner for Tanev as he is more of 2 way defender, leaning more towards the offensive end of the ice, therefore complimenting one another's style. Looking at Hanifin' PP Time On Ice and SH Time On Ice at 46 and 30 seconds respectively, this tells me that both coaching staffs (Ward and Sutter) didn't feel the need to play him on either first unit as there were better options. Even Stone, Mackey, Nesterov and your boy Valimaki who 'can easily do what gio does' all averaged more SHTOI than Hanifin.

If in fact Hanifin and Tanev were better than Giordano, one would think that the 'professionals' within the organization might make a push for their ice time to be increased???

Or were saving them for the playoffs...
Jun. 4, 2021 at 6:01 p.m.
#16
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2019
Posts: 2,088
Likes: 686
Quoting: FlamesNutt
Do I "think" Giordano was better than Hanifin and Tanev individually this past season? Yes. But that's merely my personal opinion.

So...let's take a look at the stats.

Giordano led the teams defense in the following statistical categories, Goals, Assists, Points, Shots on Goal, Shooting %, GWG, PPG, Hits, Blocked Shots and Time On Ice

Tanev led the teams defense in +/- and SH Time On Ice with 3:07 per game followed closely by Girodano at 3:03 per game.

Hanifin DID NOT lead the team in a single statistical category, he did however have more PIMs than Giordano. 18 to 14.

Now some may argue that Tanev is a better defender than Giordano and that's a valid discussion, but Tanev definitely isn't a better all around defensemen as he doesn't skate as well as Gio, nor does he have the offensive upside. This is backed up by the fact that Tanev averaged 12 SECONDS of PP Time On Ice.

Hanifin makes a great partner for Tanev as he is more of 2 way defender, leaning more towards the offensive end of the ice, therefore complimenting one another's style. Looking at Hanifin' PP Time On Ice and SH Time On Ice at 46 and 30 seconds respectively, this tells me that both coaching staffs (Ward and Sutter) didn't feel the need to play him on either first unit as there were better options. Even Stone, Mackey, Nesterov and your boy Valimaki who 'can easily do what gio does' all averaged more SHTOI than Hanifin.

If in fact Hanifin and Tanev were better than Giordano, one would think that the 'professionals' within the organization might make a push for their ice time to be increased???

Or were saving them for the playoffs...


Quoting: FlamesNutt
Do I "think" Giordano was better than Hanifin and Tanev individually this past season? Yes. But that's merely my personal opinion.

So...let's take a look at the stats.

Giordano led the teams defense in the following statistical categories, Goals, Assists, Points, Shots on Goal, Shooting %, GWG, PPG, Hits, Blocked Shots and Time On Ice

Tanev led the teams defense in +/- and SH Time On Ice with 3:07 per game followed closely by Girodano at 3:03 per game.

Hanifin DID NOT lead the team in a single statistical category, he did however have more PIMs than Giordano. 18 to 14.

Now some may argue that Tanev is a better defender than Giordano and that's a valid discussion, but Tanev definitely isn't a better all around defensemen as he doesn't skate as well as Gio, nor does he have the offensive upside. This is backed up by the fact that Tanev averaged 12 SECONDS of PP Time On Ice.

Hanifin makes a great partner for Tanev as he is more of 2 way defender, leaning more towards the offensive end of the ice, therefore complimenting one another's style. Looking at Hanifin' PP Time On Ice and SH Time On Ice at 46 and 30 seconds respectively, this tells me that both coaching staffs (Ward and Sutter) didn't feel the need to play him on either first unit as there were better options. Even Stone, Mackey, Nesterov and your boy Valimaki who 'can easily do what gio does' all averaged more SHTOI than Hanifin.

If in fact Hanifin and Tanev were better than Giordano, one would think that the 'professionals' within the organization might make a push for their ice time to be increased???

Or were saving them for the playoffs...



You should look at some advanced analytics and actually watch some games
Jun. 4, 2021 at 6:33 p.m.
#17
Thread Starter
In Sutter We Trust?
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2021
Posts: 38
Likes: 9
Quoting: flamesfan
You should look at some advanced analytics and actually watch some games


Too many words for you to read I'll assume. Move along.
Jun. 4, 2021 at 7:29 p.m.
#18
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2019
Posts: 2,088
Likes: 686
Quoting: FlamesNutt
Too many words for you to read I'll assume. Move along.


No
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll