SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Off-Season

Created by: Beetlejuice
Team: 2021-22 Chicago Blackhawks
Initial Creation Date: Jul. 4, 2021
Published: Jul. 4, 2021
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
2$2,000,000
2$1,500,000
2$1,350,000
1$900,000
1$1,050,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
1$2,000,000
Trades
1.
CHI
  1. Jones, Caleb
  2. Turris, Kyle
  3. 2023 4th round pick (EDM)
EDM
  1. Keith, Duncan ($1,100,000 retained)
2.
CHI
SEA
  1. Connolly, Brett
Additional Details:
My pick: Brett Connelly
I think Seattle won't take de Haan's contract unless Hawks pay them to, I think another faction that turns them away from de Haan is his injury history. With Connelly they get a serviceable bottom 6 foward, that has playoff experience with the Capitals. Hasktoll does love veteran players, which makes me believe if Keith isn't traded before the expansion draft they will select him for his leadership and his experience in the league, not to mention he would be a good 3rd pairing defensemen for them.
3.
CBJ
  1. Mitchell, Ian
  2. Strome, Dylan
  3. 2021 1st round pick (CHI)
4.
CHI
  1. 2022 5th round pick (WPG)
WPG
  1. De Haan, Calvin ($1,550,000 retained)
Retained Salary Transactions
Buried
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2021
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the VGK
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the FLA
2022
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the VGK
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the WPG
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
2023
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
21$81,500,000$54,027,547$452,439$4,840,000$27,472,453
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$6,400,000$6,400,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$2,500,000$2M)
C, RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$2,625,000$2,625,000
RW
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$307,500$308K)
LW, C
RFA - 3
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$10,500,000$10,500,000
C
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$3,700,000$3,700,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$1,500,000$1,500,000
LW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$2,000,000$2,000,000
C, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$842,500$842,500 (Performance Bonus$32,500$32K)
LW, C, RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$900,000$900,000
RW, LW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$1,350,000$1,350,000
C
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$1,050,000$1,050,000
C, RW
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Columbus Blue Jackets
$5,400,000$5,400,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$300,000$300K)
LD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$3,850,000$3,850,000
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$850,000$850,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$894,167$894,167 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
RD
RFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$800,000$800,000
G
UFA - 1
$2,000,000$2,000,000
G
UFA
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$1,350,000$1,350,000
LD
RFA - 3
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$6,875,000$6,875,000
RD
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$3,900,000$3,900,000
C, RW
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Jul. 4, 2021 at 1:08 a.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 1,913
Likes: 562
If you want the pick your going to need retain more Keith at 4 mil works
Jul. 4, 2021 at 1:18 a.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2017
Posts: 240
Likes: 35
Hoping we avoid Jones at all costs. He's been carried by Werenski in CBJ and didn't have a good year at all in terms of underlying numbers. Would be smarter to go after Dougie in FA rather than losing assets for a defenseman that's way worse IMO.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll