Can’t see Wagner cracking this lineup.

I mean hes a fine 4th line grinder, sure there are better skilled players, but he is a role player... would you rather waste the 1.35 mil?

Yes. He was horrid last year. Sure, he could bounce back, but he shouldn’t have been in the lineup last year. Lazar is better, playing the lesser player because he’s getting paid more is a pretty dumb strategy. Lazar in, Wagner out costs the bruins zero extra dollars against the cap and makes the team better.

Cool, just make your point without saying dumb, its not dumb, its just not what you were thinking
Dumb is these morons trading debrusk and like 5 other pieces for Monahan

I like Lazar better, i am just being realistic

Maybe my point was lost in translation. You said, “would you rather waste the 1.35?” I think that notion is, for a lack of a better term, kinda dumb. If you’re taking contract into consideration instead of just icing the best roster with the signed players, it seems like a bad tactic.

Just send him to the AHL. If someone claims his great, if not then you save $1.125 million in cap space.

Lmao I have Wagner on the 4th line, deal with it. Its not like I have Pasta on the 3rd line or Bergeron playing RW
Its not even like I have wagner on the 3rd line like he played a few times last year

If you guys disagree, thats fine and thats our opinion, but hes here and thats ok

That wasn’t really teh point i was disagreeing with. I was disagreeing with the logic of playing someone because they’re getting paid a 500k more, even though they’re the inferior player.

All I said was send him to the AHL.

Then you're not "wasting" $1.35 million and instead only wasting $225k. It also covers 90% of the cap space you'd need at what you have Rask signed for.

Cool, make an ACGM
lmao damn

Why would I make the same ACGM but just put Wagner in the minors? You seem awful defensive about your ACGM and Wagner....lmao damn

BTW Boston wouldn't carry 3 goalies. Swayman is waiver exempt and would go down to the AHL to take the #1 role so he could get more games. He wouldn't get enough games with Rask and Ullmark on the NHL roster. Ironic that you wouldn't think of that and your username is "LogicOnly"

Why are you being so defensive?

After last year, if Swyamna continues to paly like he did, there is a 0% chance they send him down.

If you are gonna be rude and over-cocky, at least get it right

Lmao im not. you guys are.

I have wagner in the lineup, and I am leaving him there.
You guys are the ones trying to make me change it

very clear.
stop

I've been following Swayman well before you probably even knew who the kid was. If Rask comes back Swayman is going down. They aren't going to have a 3 goalie rotation and what's better for Swayman's development, playing 1-2 games every few weeks behind Rask/Ullmark or getting #1 reps down in Providence? Again for someone who uses the name "LogicOnly" you don't tend to use logic.

You want to talk about rude and over-cocky then look at your own post. You act like you know everything and that everyone is wrong, then get defensive when people don't agree with you.

Oh and one more thing, no one is trying to make you change anything. We've simply given a different opinion perspective. I haven't told you to change your ACGM and neither has CMcAvoy73. You 100% have gotten defensive about your ACGM and it continues to show post after post. I'll let others continue to deal with your child like hissy fits when someone disagrees with you, as for me I'll just put you on the ignore list.

Thats called projection lol
I made a post that has nothing "wrong", just stuff that you disagree with
I told you I disagree with your suggestions

the fact that you are here trying to Convince me something is bad about what I did is the problem

you are the only one being rude here obviously lmao, my comments have all been just logical and basic
So leave or you will simply be ignored

Well, we’re critiquing an ACGM which is kind of the point of this site. We did it politely, and you have gotten very whiny and defensive. If polite criticism and people disagreeing with you is something that is going to ruffle your feathers, maybe this site isn’t for you. You can still make the ACGMs and not hit publish. Might be a better option.

I told you I liked Wagner in there,
you two vehemently tried telling me I was wrong

You are being very clearly hypocritical right now lol so im done here

That isn’t what happened.

It’s okay to disagree. You’ll be fine. Deep breaths.

No thats literally what happened, its all above this lmao

I said lets agree to disagree.

After a ton of whining, and i mean a ton of whining, yes you did.

No, I maintained that the whole time, just go read the damn comments lol

“Deal with it,” is about the whiniest three word phrase a human can use.