SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

We're interested, Joe Sakic

Created by: nobody
Team: 2017-18 Vancouver Canucks
Initial Creation Date: Mar. 15, 2017
Published: Mar. 15, 2017
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
Lemme explain.

In exchange for Duchene, Colorado gets a decent top pairing dmam, a 6th overall draft pick a few years ago, an all star AHL dman, as well as a first rounder that is NOT lottery protected, to go with a second to sweeten things up (which VAN gets back from Columbus for the compensation of signing Torts. Vancouver then becomes damn good at center. It should be noted this comes after the expansion draft so Vancouver can protect its other guys.

Anaheim will lose Silferberg in expansion anyways, so they might as well get something for him. Vancouver takes Stoner and his contract too for Anaheim to agree.

Expansion Draft : Sedin, Sedin, Eriksson, Horvat, Baertschi, Sutter, Granlund ; Edler, Tanev, Gudbranson, Markstorm

Thoughts?
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
8$5,500,000
5$4,250,000
2$2,000,000
1$863,000
1$950,000
1$900,000
1$900,000
Trades
1.
VAN
  1. Duchene, Matt
COL
  1. Subban, Jordan
  2. Tanev, Christopher
  3. Virtanen, Jake
  4. 2018 1st round pick (VAN)
  5. 2018 2nd round pick (VAN)
2.
VAN
VGK
  1. Sbisa, Luca
3.
VAN
  1. 2018 2nd round pick (CBJ)
CBJ
    Compensation for Torts
    4.
    VAN
    1. Silfverberg, Jakob
    2. Stoner, Clayton
    ANA
    1. 2019 2nd round pick (VAN)
    Buyouts
    Retained Salary Transactions
    Buried
    DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
    2018
    Logo of the CBJ
    Logo of the VAN
    Logo of the VAN
    Logo of the VAN
    Logo of the VAN
    Logo of the VAN
    2019
    Logo of the VAN
    Logo of the VAN
    Logo of the VAN
    Logo of the VAN
    Logo of the VAN
    Logo of the VAN
    2020
    Logo of the VAN
    Logo of the VAN
    Logo of the VAN
    Logo of the VAN
    Logo of the VAN
    Logo of the VAN
    Logo of the VAN
    ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
    23$74,500,000$74,170,499$0$2,062,500$329,501

    Roster

    Left WingCentreRight Wing
    Baertschi, Sven
    $1,850,000$1,850,000
    LW
    UFA - 1
    Horvat, Bo
    $5,500,000$5,500,000
    C
    UFA - 6
    Silfverberg, Jakob
    $3,750,000$3,750,000
    RW, LW
    UFA - 2
    Granlund, Markus
    $900,000$900,000
    RW, LW, C
    UFA - 1
    Duchene, Matt
    $6,000,000$6,000,000
    RW, C
    UFA - 2
    Sutter, Brandon
    $4,375,000$4,375,000
    RW, C
    NTC
    UFA - 4
    Sedin, Daniel
    $7,000,000$7,000,000
    LW
    NMC
    UFA - 1
    Sedin, Henrik
    $7,000,000$7,000,000
    C
    NMC
    UFA - 1
    Eriksson, Loui
    $6,000,000$6,000,000
    LW, RW
    NMC
    UFA - 5
    Goldobin, Nikolay
    $863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$212,500$212K)
    LW
    UFA - 2
    Dorsett, Derek
    $2,650,000$2,650,000
    RW
    UFA - 2
    Gaunce, Brendan
    $900,000$900,000
    LW, C
    UFA - 2
    Chaput, Michael
    $950,000$950,000
    C
    UFA - 1
    Boucher, Reid
    $863,000$863,000
    LW
    UFA - 1
    Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
    Edler, Alexander
    $5,000,000$5,000,000
    LD
    NTC
    UFA - 2
    Stecher, Troy
    $925,000$925,000
    RD
    UFA - 1
    Markström, Jacob
    $3,666,667$3,666,667
    G
    UFA - 3
    Hutton, Ben
    $2,800,000$2,800,000
    LD
    UFA - 2
    Gudbranson, Erik
    $4,250,000$4,250,000
    RD
    UFA - 1
    Demko, Thatcher
    $925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$1,850,000$2M)
    G
    UFA - 2
    Juolevi, Olli
    $894,166$894,166
    LD
    UFA - 4
    Waivers ExemptTryamkin, Nikita
    $2,000,000$2,000,000
    LD
    RFA
    Biega, Alex
    $750,000$750,000
    RD
    UFA - 1

    Embed Code

    • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
    • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

    Text-Embed

    Click to Highlight
    Mar. 15, 2017 at 4:26 a.m.
    #1
    jonnnycanuck44
    Jonny Canuck
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Mar. 2017
    Posts: 391
    Likes: 16
    Have to give more then a 3rd to Anaheim, Why give up on Virtanen so easily?
    Mar. 15, 2017 at 4:27 a.m.
    #2
    nobody
    Thread Starter
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jan. 2017
    Posts: 9,552
    Likes: 3,052
    Quoting: jonnnycanuck44
    Have to give more then a 3rd to Anaheim, Why give up on Virtanen so easily?


    Not giving up, just packaging him for a much better player
    Mar. 15, 2017 at 4:32 a.m.
    #3
    nobody
    Thread Starter
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jan. 2017
    Posts: 9,552
    Likes: 3,052
    Quoting: jonnnycanuck44
    Have to give more then a 3rd to Anaheim, Why give up on Virtanen so easily?


    Also its now a second not a third, which is more fair perhaps
    Mar. 15, 2017 at 8:07 a.m.
    #4
    palhal
    LongtimeLeafsufferer
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jul. 2015
    Posts: 59,901
    Likes: 22,900
    I just don't get why Vancouver, who may/should be in a rebuilt want trade for two years of Duchene. Virtanen, Subban and the second rounder ain't much to give up, but Tanev has value as possibly a a top ten pick might have real long term value. While I think it's not a good fit for Vancouver, I kinda think the Avs may not like the trade either. They might want some good young immediate help (more than Tanev(.
    Ducks would want more for Silverberg. Sure they might lose him in the draft, but with that trade they would lose one of their Dmen. Two non protected players, either an NHLer or near NHL I would think would be the minimum.
    Mar. 15, 2017 at 10:05 a.m.
    #5
    Lenny7
    Lenny7
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jan. 2017
    Posts: 13,291
    Likes: 11,051
    Quoting: palhal
    I just don't get why Vancouver, who may/should be in a rebuilt want trade for two years of Duchene. Virtanen, Subban and the second rounder ain't much to give up, but Tanev has value as possibly a a top ten pick might have real long term value. While I think it's not a good fit for Vancouver, I kinda think the Avs may not like the trade either. They might want some good young immediate help (more than Tanev(.
    Ducks would want more for Silverberg. Sure they might lose him in the draft, but with that trade they would lose one of their Dmen. Two non protected players, either an NHLer or near NHL I would think would be the minimum.


    Exactly! "Oh hey, Ducks are going to lose a player for nothing! We can get him for slightly more than nothing!!!". "They're still going to lose someone for nothing..." "OMG We'll take him too!!!!!"

    I'm kind of excited for the expansion draft, but I'm more excited for it to be over so that people can just go back to making crappy trades without justifying them with "EXPANSION DRAFT THO!"
    Mar. 15, 2017 at 11:05 a.m.
    #6
    Jacketsman61
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: May 2016
    Posts: 4,443
    Likes: 941
    Ok, I hate to be the one to say this but this won't even be considered by Colorado. Virtanen does not carry much value at all. Subban is definitely not like PK. Being an AHL all star does not translate to being a star in the NHL. Tanev is a good player. He does bring some value, but he is better off in Vancouver. The rebuild is coming. Sedins are gone after next year. Vancouver should focus their energy on moving them and getting a head start on the rebuild.
    Mar. 15, 2017 at 1:30 p.m.
    #7
    nobody
    Thread Starter
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jan. 2017
    Posts: 9,552
    Likes: 3,052
    Quoting: palhal
    I just don't get why Vancouver, who may/should be in a rebuilt want trade for two years of Duchene. Virtanen, Subban and the second rounder ain't much to give up, but Tanev has value as possibly a a top ten pick might have real long term value. While I think it's not a good fit for Vancouver, I kinda think the Avs may not like the trade either. They might want some good young immediate help (more than Tanev(.
    Ducks would want more for Silverberg. Sure they might lose him in the draft, but with that trade they would lose one of their Dmen. Two non protected players, either an NHLer or near NHL I would think would be the minimum.


    Trust me I am one of those people who wants the Canucks to go through the rebuild mode, but IF they got Duchene (which will never happen but then what is this site for?), I thought they actually look okay. I saw, however, a hole for a right handed top six winger. Assuming the Ducks protect Kesler, Getslaf, Perry, Rakell, Fowler, Lindholm, Vatanen, Manson and Gibson (Bieksa waives NTC), the only valuable player left available is Silferberg. Not sure how much it would cost, but with him in the lineup, this team isnt half bad
    Mar. 15, 2017 at 7:42 p.m.
    #8
    Harrisonj99
    Canucks Fan
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Apr. 2016
    Posts: 53
    Likes: 2
    I seriously doubt that Vegas will be stupid enough to pick Luca Sbisa. They would be much better off picking Gaunce, or even Cramarossa or Chaput
    Mar. 15, 2017 at 7:45 p.m.
    #9
    nobody
    Thread Starter
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jan. 2017
    Posts: 9,552
    Likes: 3,052
    Quoting: Harrisonj99
    I seriously doubt that Vegas will be stupid enough to pick Luca Sbisa. They would be much better off picking Gaunce, or even Cramarossa or Chaput


    I hope they take Sbisa. He is pure garbage who makes too many mistakes per game and is seriously overpaid
    Mar. 15, 2017 at 8:35 p.m.
    #10
    NobodyCares
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Mar. 2017
    Posts: 978
    Likes: 43
    When I read the description I was like "this guy's out of his mind... he's just giving up so much" .... then I saw the players you were talking about and was like "bwahahaha Colorado gets ripped off again," Pretty sure they wanted a YOUNG defenseman who's got top pair potential. That means Stecher Tryamkin Hutton or Juoevi.... not friiggen Tanev the 27 year old. They are starting a rebuild Tanev will be 32 by the time they can fight for a playoff spot. Stop hoarding young good defensemen, you have the assets to make the deal so just give enough to make it happen.
    Mar. 15, 2017 at 9:05 p.m.
    #11
    nobody
    Thread Starter
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jan. 2017
    Posts: 9,552
    Likes: 3,052
    Quoting: NobodyCares
    When I read the description I was like "this guy's out of his mind... he's just giving up so much" .... then I saw the players you were talking about and was like "bwahahaha Colorado gets ripped off again," Pretty sure they wanted a YOUNG defenseman who's got top pair potential. That means Stecher Tryamkin Hutton or Juoevi.... not friiggen Tanev the 27 year old. They are starting a rebuild Tanev will be 32 by the time they can fight for a playoff spot. Stop hoarding young good defensemen, you have the assets to make the deal so just give enough to make it happen.


    So youre saying if I put Juolevi instead of Tanev this could work? Just wondering
     
    Reply
    To create a post please Login or Register
    Question:
    Options:
    Add Option
    Submit Poll