SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Aim for Zegras Window

Created by: Christian17
Team: 2021-22 Anaheim Ducks
Initial Creation Date: Dec. 16, 2021
Published: Dec. 16, 2021
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
The Ducks are in a weird but good position. They are currently 1st in the Pacific, and based on their play up to this point they’re likely the 2nd best team in the Pacific. However, with Manson, Lindholm, and Rakell becoming UFAs this season they could possibly lose three of their core players in the offseason. Right now the Ducks are good, but their chances of contending for a Cup this season are highly unlikely.
With that acknowledgment, it’s in the Ducks’ best interest to sell these expiring contracts in order to set up Zegras and Drysdale for their Cup windows. Also, the Ducks GM, Jeff Solomon, has reiterated that they are a rebuilding team.

With these trades you can see there’s a method by which they can capitalize on their expiring assets while also retaining some of their competitiveness in the present.

For the current roster they subtract: Rakell, Lindholm, Manson, Comtois, Mahura, DLo.
The most costly of those losses being Rakell, Lindholm, Manson and Comtois. However, the Ducks have shown they can still produce when missing Rakell and Comtois. The big issue becomes how well they can defend without Lindholm (their best D) or Manson (3rd best D).

They add to the roster: Dadonov, Liljegren, and Chychrun. The obvious big addition is Chychrun. Chychrun should be able to fit nicely into Lindholm’s spot, although he isn’t playing as well as Lindholm this season the change in quality shouldn’t be incredibly noticeable.

Liljegren is a significant initial downgrade on Manson, however, Fowler has had an ability the past three seasons to make any partner look good and Liljegren has had a good season on a very good Leafs squad.

Dadonov is still a good player, the issue with him is that he’ll likely regress next season and VGK obviously have a really bad cap situation, which is why VGK has to pay to get rid of him. He won’t be the same as Rakell, but he doesn’t have to be, just good enough to play within the top 9.

Finally, the Ducks have a very good prospect in Perrault who is doing well in the AHL and should see some time in the NHL. If he can take over the shooting spot with Milano-Zegras then that with Dadonov should negate most of the loss of skill from Comtois and Rakell.
So with the new roster the Ducks offense becomes marginally worse while their defense takes a decent hit. These changes likely push them below VGK and EDM in the Pacific, but there’s a decent chance they still make the playoffs with this roster.

On top of these roster changes, they also bring in Schneider, a 1st and two 2nds while becoming younger on the backend.
Trades
1.
ANA
  1. 2022 1st round pick (CGY)
  2. 2022 2nd round pick (FLA)
CGY
  1. Rakell, Rickard ($1,894,722 retained)
Additional Details:
Rakell is on pace for 30 goals, has a great contract, plus retention.
2.
ANA
  1. Dadonov, Evgeni
  2. 2022 2nd round pick (VGK)
VGK
  1. Deslauriers, Nicolas
Additional Details:
I am literally basing this trade solely on what I saw on Vegas Armchair GMs. Ducks can afford to have his 5M on the books for next year.
3.
ANA
  1. Liljegren, Timothy
  2. 2022 2nd round pick (TOR)
TOR
  1. Manson, Josh ($2,050,000 retained)
Additional Details:
Leaf's fans seem to really want Manson, this is what it might take. Maybe put a condition on the second for games played, turn into a 3rd next year if Manson gets injured.
4.
ANA
  1. Schneider, Braden
  2. 2022 1st round pick (NYR)
Additional Details:
Schneider is a good prospect but seems like he doesn't have a road in NYR with Trouba and Fox there for a while. NYR have a strangely aged core because they have very young stars, however, they have stars that should be competing now in Zibanejad, Panarin, Kreider and Trouba. So according to this they should definitely go all in right now while Laf and Kakko are on their ELCs.
NYR
  1. Lindholm, Hampus ($2,600,000 retained)
Additional Details:
Lindholm is a top pairing dman, NYR desperately need good defense and Lindholm gives them that.
5.
ARI
  1. Comtois, Maxime
  2. Mahura, Josh
  3. 2022 1st round pick (CGY)
  4. 2022 2nd round pick (VGK)
Additional Details:
Kind of based it around Eichel but less because Chychrun is worth less.

Comtois is three years younger than Tuch and has around that same kind of potential. He played with a floating bone in his hand for this season, which is why his production wasn't like last year. But when healthy he should be able to average 50 pts.

Mahura is more of a B prospect not worth as much as Krebs obviously but Chychrun isn't worth as much Eichel. So I think it's a reasonable trade.
Buyouts
Retained Salary Transactions
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2022
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the FLA
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the NSH
2023
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
2024
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
24$81,500,000$58,733,388$0$3,815,000$22,766,612
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$1,456,250$1,456,250
LW, C
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$3,000,000$3,000,000 (Performance Bonus$1,500,000$2M)
C
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$1,450,000$1,450,000
RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$1,700,000$1,700,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
C, LW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$894,167$894,167
RW
RFA - 4
Logo of the Vegas Golden Knights
$2,500,000$2,500,000
RW, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$874,125$874,125
C, LW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$5,250,000$5,250,000
RW, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$874,125$874,125
C, LW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$750,000$750,000
C, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$1,295,000$1,295,000
LW, RW
RFA - 3
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Arizona Coyotes
$4,600,000$4,600,000
LD/RD
UFA - 4
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
RD
RFA - 2
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$6,400,000$6,400,000
G
M-NTC
UFA - 6
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$6,500,000$6,500,000
LD/RD
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$400,000$400K)
RD
RFA - 1
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$950,000$950,000
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$809,166$809,166 (Performance Bonus$82,500$82K)
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$3,900,000$3,900,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$822,500$822,500 (Performance Bonus$132,500$132K)
G
RFA - 2
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$1,500,000$1,500,000
LW, C
UFA - 2
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$6,875,000$6,875,000
C, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$750,000$750,000
RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$1,200,000$1,200,000
LD
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Dec. 16, 2021 at 3:16 a.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 3,629
Likes: 1,515
Schneider isn't available, period.
HOCKEYBOY448 and nyrfan81 liked this.
Dec. 16, 2021 at 3:33 a.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2020
Posts: 11,198
Likes: 8,702
I like your thought process and I understand basing Chychrun around eichel, but the difference with them other than eichel being a centre and better, is the cap hit. Eichels cap hit extremely limited his possible suitors. With Chychruns contract I would say basically every team could be a possible suitor for him. That said I think his price might be a bit higher. As of right now you have a late first, a good player in Comtois, and a decent prospect in mahura. I feel like they would want maybe a player like Tracey or some other higher level prospect.
Dec. 16, 2021 at 3:51 a.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 6,595
Likes: 3,302
First off Schneider isn’t for sale. Second we need a third pairing d man if anything. We don’t need a top pair guy with our top 4 set pretty much with Fox and Lindgren and Trouba and Miller. This seems completely unnecessary and we’d be better off targeting a 3C to win faceoffs or a middle six forward to play on the right side.
Dec. 16, 2021 at 9:30 a.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2021
Posts: 347
Likes: 82
Leafs decline, Manson isn't worth that for us
Dec. 16, 2021 at 9:58 a.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 1,928
Likes: 939
Really really easy declines for the Rangers, Leafs and Yotes.
nyrfan81 liked this.
Dec. 16, 2021 at 11:35 a.m.
#6
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2021
Posts: 2,206
Likes: 914
With retention I think that's a hard trade for the Flames to turn down. Would love the assurance of an extension but I think you put forward a good deal here!
Dec. 16, 2021 at 2:36 p.m.
#7
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2017
Posts: 473
Likes: 72
Quoting: hero9154
Really really easy declines for the Rangers, Leafs and Yotes.


Nah I think you're wrong.
Dec. 16, 2021 at 2:40 p.m.
#8
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2017
Posts: 473
Likes: 72
Quoting: HOCKEYBOY448
First off Schneider isn’t for sale. Second we need a third pairing d man if anything. We don’t need a top pair guy with our top 4 set pretty much with Fox and Lindgren and Trouba and Miller. This seems completely unnecessary and we’d be better off targeting a 3C to win faceoffs or a middle six forward to play on the right side.


The Rangers left side is very weak. Miller is not performing well in CF% or xGF% next to Trouba and Nemeth is even worse. Lindholm is exactly what they need, they have the offensive horses to create but they don't have defense to get the forwards the puck. I think in a trade like this Scheider would easily be made available. There's not really a slot for him in NYR for the next 5 years anyway.
Dec. 16, 2021 at 3:07 p.m.
#9
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 201
Likes: 63
Quoting: Christian17
Nah I think you're wrong.


Nah he is right.
HOCKEYBOY448 liked this.
Dec. 16, 2021 at 5:23 p.m.
#10
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2017
Posts: 473
Likes: 72
Quoting: nyrfan81
Nah he is right.


Nah not close.
Dec. 17, 2021 at 1:38 a.m.
#11
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 6,595
Likes: 3,302
Quoting: Christian17
The Rangers left side is very weak. Miller is not performing well in CF% or xGF% next to Trouba and Nemeth is even worse. Lindholm is exactly what they need, they have the offensive horses to create but they don't have defense to get the forwards the puck. I think in a trade like this Scheider would easily be made available. There's not really a slot for him in NYR for the next 5 years anyway.


Miller has improved over time and he and Trouba have been a solid second pair. Nemeth is the only position I’d be concerned about upgrading or replacing and it wouldn’t cost Schneider and a 1st to do so. Analytics don’t tell the entire story, not too mention Miller is only 21. There’s no reason for us to do the above trade. If you don’t watch the Rangers night in and out I don’t think analytics provide the full picture.
Dec. 17, 2021 at 2:09 a.m.
#12
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2017
Posts: 473
Likes: 72
Quoting: HOCKEYBOY448
Miller has improved over time and he and Trouba have been a solid second pair. Nemeth is the only position I’d be concerned about upgrading or replacing and it wouldn’t cost Schneider and a 1st to do so. Analytics don’t tell the entire story, not too mention Miller is only 21. There’s no reason for us to do the above trade. If you don’t watch the Rangers night in and out I don’t think analytics provide the full picture.


Well if you don’t think analytics provide a good enough picture for a trade then I don’t think you’re a good judge for what an actual GM would consider.
Dec. 17, 2021 at 2:13 a.m.
#13
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 6,595
Likes: 3,302
Quoting: Christian17
Well if you don’t think analytics provide a good enough picture for a trade then I don’t think you’re a good judge for what an actual GM would consider.


All I said is that it doesn’t provide the full picture. Never said they have no value.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll