SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Sharks Re-Tool Help Oilers

Created by: JacobLyons
Team: 2021-22 San Jose Sharks
Initial Creation Date: Jan. 22, 2022
Published: Jan. 22, 2022
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
Thoughts on the trade?
Trades
SJS
  1. Koskinen, Mikko
  2. 2022 1st round pick (EDM)
  3. 2023 4th round pick (EDM)
EDM
Buyouts
Retained Salary Transactions
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2022
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the ARI
Logo of the MIN
2023
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
2024
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
22$81,500,000$68,605,833$0$867,500$12,894,167
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$3,000,000$3,000,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$5,625,000$5,625,000
C
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$1,550,000$1,550,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$750,000$750,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$8,000,000$8,000,000
C
M-NTC
UFA - 6
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$212,500$212K)
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$1,025,000$1,025,000
C, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$850,000$850,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$500,000$500,000
LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$842,500$842,500 (Performance Bonus$82,500$82K)
C
UFA - 2
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$750,000$750,000
LW, RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$848,333$848,333 (Performance Bonus$60,000$60K)
LW, RW
RFA - 3
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$212,500$212K)
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$10,000,000$10,000,000
RD
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$2,250,000$2,250,000
LD/RD
UFA - 3
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$5,280,000$5,280,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$2,175,000$2,175,000
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$7,000,000$7,000,000
LD/RD
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$300,000$300K)
RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$4,500,000$4,500,000
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$750,000$750,000
LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$4,725,000$4,725,000
RW, LW
UFA - 3
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$750,000$750,000
C
UFA - 2
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$796,667$796,667
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$783,333$783,333
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$725,000$725,000
LD
UFA - 1
Taxi Squad
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$750,000$750,000 ($0$0$0$0)
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$725,000$725,000 ($0$0$0$0)
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$750,000$750,000 ($0$0$0$0)
LD
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Jan. 22, 2022 at 5:08 a.m.
#1
Leafs 4 Lyfe
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2021
Posts: 873
Likes: 127
Doubt oilers will retain on koskinen
Hes up after this year anyways
Jan. 22, 2022 at 12:50 p.m.
#2
CELEBRINI IS A SHARK
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2019
Posts: 10,116
Likes: 12,851
Decline for the Sharks.

Reimers play has dictated he'll pull at least a second if he was ever to be moved (probs a tad more) - and Barabanov is worth more to us then trading and so he as well costs more than a 2nd.
So were really getting the worse pieces and a lacklustre pick (assuming EDM improves at to the trade that will be a late/mid pick) for getting the worse return and not anything enticing to losing our best goalie and a top 6 winger. Barabanov should return a 1st or some seconds/ a prospect otherwise hes not worth moving (regardless of what other teams think). He's too important for our rosters forward group.
Bias_it_self and JacobLyons liked this.
Jan. 22, 2022 at 10:44 p.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2018
Posts: 4,213
Likes: 1,010
Quoting: yikes
Decline for the Sharks.

Reimers play has dictated he'll pull at least a second if he was ever to be moved (probs a tad more) - and Barabanov is worth more to us then trading and so he as well costs more than a 2nd.
So were really getting the worse pieces and a lacklustre pick (assuming EDM improves at to the trade that will be a late/mid pick) for getting the worse return and not anything enticing to losing our best goalie and a top 6 winger. Barabanov should return a 1st or some seconds/ a prospect otherwise hes not worth moving (regardless of what other teams think). He's too important for our rosters forward group.

SJ is not going to help an in division team that they are competing for a playoff spot with guy who can Play in the NHL, a low 1st and a 4th for their #1 goalie signed at a good rate, and a useful F retained. the 4th would be just to take Koskinen since Holland cant give him away so basically a 1st for 2 useful player. In division you have to pay a premium.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll