SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Playoff Leafs

Created by: Egregious
Team: 2021-22 Toronto Maple Leafs
Initial Creation Date: Feb. 11, 2022
Published: Feb. 11, 2022
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
For consideration via Jfresh and topdown hockeys model

Hagel - 83% WAR
Kubalik - 82%
De Haan - 89%

Alex Kerfoot - 25%
Nick Ritchie - 15%
Justin Holl - 48%

Honestly might not even need to trade Ritchie or have some of the retention on the blackhawks players considering in moving Holl and Kerfoot the leafs open up some good space
Trades
1.
TOR
  1. De Haan, Calvin ($2,275,000 retained)
  2. Hagel, Brandon
  3. Kubalik, Dominik ($1,850,000 retained)
CHI
  1. Abramov, Mikhail
  2. Hirvonen, Roni [Reserve List]
  3. Holl, Justin
  4. Kerfoot, Alexander
  5. Ritchie, Nick
  6. Villeneuve, William
  7. 2022 1st round pick (TOR)
  8. 2023 3rd round pick (TOR)
  9. 2024 3rd round pick (TOR)
2.
TOR
    Value-wise pretty sure the mock trade is fine, Hirvonen is basically a late-first, early-second prospect - Abramov is a developed second, along with a third for retention seems a relatively fair price for one year of De Haan as a rental. Kerfoot for Hagel one-for-one seems fair looking at Hagel's limited experience and low draft pedigree - although together the value of Holl along with another third, villeneuve (4th) and a first could pay for the difference of Hagel and make the value of the last year of Kubalik's deal.
    CHI
      It was reported Chicago was willing to deal anyone outside of Toews, Jones and Kane - also mentioned Kubalik and De Haan by name as people as players on the block. Hagel is the main question mark in the deal however he's really fucking good and I'm not sure how much the blackhawks value him so I'd be willing for the leafs to pay a bunch for him because there's def a very strong top-6 forward ceiling
      3.
      TOR
        Looking further into Hagel vs Kerfoot

        31pts in 44 games (Kerf)
        26 points in 41 games (Hagel)

        The main consideration in comparing them in value is obviously Hagel is 3 years younger than Kerf and on a very strong contract. Leafs probably could end up giving up more assets to even out the swap (additionally because Kerfoot doesn't fit the Blackhawks vision that well) but it could well be worth it with Hagel's potential and team friendly deal - exactly the kind of player the leafs get a ton of value out of
        CHI
          yeah im writing an essay what about it
          Retained Salary Transactions
          DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
          2022
          Logo of the TOR
          Logo of the TOR
          2023
          Logo of the TOR
          Logo of the TOR
          Logo of the TOR
          Logo of the TOR
          Logo of the TOR
          2024
          Logo of the TOR
          Logo of the TOR
          Logo of the TOR
          Logo of the TOR
          Logo of the TOR
          Logo of the TOR
          ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
          22$81,500,000$79,908,116$0$400,000$1,591,884
          Left WingCentreRight Wing
          Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
          $950,000$950,000
          LW
          UFA - 2
          Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
          $11,640,250$11,640,250
          C
          UFA - 3
          Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
          $10,903,000$10,903,000
          RW
          UFA - 4
          Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
          $1,850,000$1,850,000
          LW, RW
          UFA - 1
          Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
          $11,000,000$11,000,000
          C, LW
          NMC
          UFA - 4
          Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
          $6,962,366$6,962,366
          RW
          UFA - 3
          Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
          $1,645,000$1,645,000
          LW, RW
          UFA - 1
          Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
          $1,500,000$1,500,000
          C
          UFA - 2
          Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
          $1,250,000$1,250,000
          RW
          UFA - 1
          Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
          $1,500,000$1,500,000
          LW
          UFA - 3
          Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
          $750,000$750,000
          C, RW
          UFA - 1
          Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
          $900,000$900,000
          RW, LW
          NTC
          UFA - 2
          Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
          $1,250,000$1,250,000
          RW, LW
          UFA - 1
          Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
          Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
          $5,000,000$5,000,000
          LD
          NMC
          UFA - 1
          Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
          $5,000,000$5,000,000
          LD/RD
          NTC
          UFA - 3
          Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
          $1,650,000$1,650,000
          G
          UFA - 1
          Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
          $5,625,000$5,625,000
          LD
          NTC
          UFA - 3
          Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
          $2,275,000$2,275,000
          LD/RD
          UFA - 1
          Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
          $3,800,000$3,800,000
          G
          M-NTC
          UFA - 3
          Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
          $894,167$894,167
          LD
          UFA - 1
          Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
          $1,500,000$1,500,000
          LD/RD
          UFA - 2
          Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
          $863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$400,000$400K)
          RD
          RFA - 1

          Embed Code

          • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
          • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

          Text-Embed

          Click to Highlight
          Feb. 11, 2022 at 12:06 p.m.
          #1
          Avatar of the user
          Joined: Mar. 2019
          Posts: 7,990
          Likes: 4,211
          You gotta love it that the whole defence is all left shot guys!
          tydini11 liked this.
          Feb. 11, 2022 at 12:15 p.m.
          #2
          Avatar of the user
          Joined: Apr. 2020
          Posts: 1,259
          Likes: 192
          I haven't watched the hawks a lot... is de Haan a physical presence
          Feb. 11, 2022 at 12:20 p.m.
          #3
          Kyle from Chicago
          Avatar of the user
          Joined: Feb. 2018
          Posts: 9,862
          Likes: 5,851
          My god so much in that trade. Hawks still say say no because Quality > Quantity. I genuinely believe they would get more assets by moving each player individually and they wouldn’t have to take all that cap space back.
          Feb. 11, 2022 at 12:44 p.m.
          #4
          Avatar of the user
          Joined: May 2015
          Posts: 19,593
          Likes: 6,733
          @CampbellStan

          Please modify the last trade to remove the offensive language, otherwise I will need to take down the entire post.
          Egregious liked this.
          Feb. 11, 2022 at 7:24 p.m.
          #5
          Bedard23
          Avatar of the user
          Joined: May 2021
          Posts: 9,299
          Likes: 4,478
          Quoting: MatthewsDynasty
          I haven't watched the hawks a lot... is de Haan a physical presence


          On occasion more of a shot blocker but to be fair that’s what Chicago has
          Feb. 12, 2022 at 1:34 a.m.
          #6
          Thread Starter
          silly funny man
          Avatar of the user
          Joined: Mar. 2021
          Posts: 13
          Likes: 1
          Quoting: Kyle_Davidson
          My god so much in that trade. Hawks still say say no because Quality > Quantity. I genuinely believe they would get more assets by moving each player individually and they wouldn’t have to take all that cap space back.


          good point there, unfortunately the leafs lack any real S tier prospects outside of Sandin (who'd I'd say is off the table) so Robertson, Knies and Niemla would be the only real assets to condense the trade - trading great prospects like that for two rentals and a former 6th rounder doesn't make a huge amount of sense. I'd say the leafs could add more assets if they needed to to complete a trade, however if the trade requires an upgrade to one of those three big prospects I wouldn't do it and I don' think Dubie would either - so maybe the deal isn't there

          As for trading all three individual blackhawks for more success, it's become a narrative recently with NHL gms that its goddamn impossible to make trades at this point because of COVID restrictions, hard cap and stuff like that so I'd say being able to unload two assets on the block in one move could be more appealing than deterring
           
          Reply
          To create a post please Login or Register
          Question:
          Options:
          Add Option
          Submit Poll