SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Two birds with one stone

Created by: Leafsleaks123
Team: 2021-22 Toronto Maple Leafs
Initial Creation Date: Feb. 12, 2022
Published: Feb. 12, 2022
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
This team doesn’t have any glaring holes but injuries in the playoffs have exposed that quality depth is their greatest need. Schenn brings a good defensive defensemen with deep playoff experience and Motte brings a physical two way forward who steps up in the playoffs.
Trades
1.
VAN
  1. 2022 2nd round pick (TOR)
2.
TOR
  1. 2022 6th round pick (ARI)
ARI
  1. Ritchie, Nick
  2. 2023 3rd round pick (TOR)
Retained Salary Transactions
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2022
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the ARI
Logo of the TOR
2023
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
2024
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
22$81,500,000$80,994,783$0$0$505,217
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$950,000$950,000
LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$11,640,250$11,640,250
C
UFA - 3
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$10,903,000$10,903,000
RW
UFA - 4
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$3,500,000$3,500,000
LW, C, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$11,000,000$11,000,000
C, LW
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$6,962,366$6,962,366
RW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$1,645,000$1,645,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$1,500,000$1,500,000
C
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$1,250,000$1,250,000
RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$1,250,000$1,250,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$750,000$750,000
C, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$1,225,000$1,225,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$900,000$900,000
RW, LW
NTC
UFA - 2
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$5,625,000$5,625,000
LD
NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$5,000,000$5,000,000
LD/RD
NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$3,800,000$3,800,000
G
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$5,000,000$5,000,000
LD
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$2,000,000$2,000,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$1,650,000$1,650,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$850,000$850,000
RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$894,167$894,167
LD
UFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$1,500,000$1,500,000
LD/RD
UFA - 2

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Feb. 12, 2022 at 3:36 p.m.
#1
Deleted
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2021
Posts: 3,175
Likes: 1,812
I really like Motte but he is not better than Simmonds, Engvall, Spezza, or Mikheyev. Not sure where he fits
Feb. 12, 2022 at 3:38 p.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 19,750
Likes: 7,382
injuries to first pairing defenders and top line centers were an issue for the leafs. 6th defenders and 4th liners arnt going to help that
Feb. 12, 2022 at 3:38 p.m.
#3
Thread Starter
Me
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 863
Likes: 254
Quoting: Nate
I really like Motte but he is not better than Simmonds, Engvall, Spezza, or Mikheyev. Not sure where he fits


He’s better than Simmonds, but the whole point is just adding depth so we don’t have to call up someone like Joey Anderson when injuries inevitably happen
Feb. 12, 2022 at 3:40 p.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 19,750
Likes: 7,382
Quoting: Leafsleaks123
He’s better than Simmonds, but the whole point is just adding depth so we don’t have to call up someone like Joey Anderson when injuries inevitably happen


how does tyler motte help if a guy like John tavares gets injured?
Feb. 12, 2022 at 3:44 p.m.
#5
Thread Starter
Me
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 863
Likes: 254
Quoting: JaredOfLondon
injuries to first pairing defenders and top line centers were an issue for the leafs. 6th defenders and 4th liners arnt going to help that


Not true. Kerfoot was excellent as the second line center last year, but we were rolling out guys like Riley Nash, Joe Thornton, and Alex Galchenyuk who aren’t NHL players in the top nine. On defence, Sandin can cover Muzzin or Reilly just fine, the glaring hole is clearly a defensemen who can be trusted at any moment on the right side
Feb. 12, 2022 at 3:46 p.m.
#6
retired
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 8,893
Likes: 4,761
change the 3rd to a 2nd in the ritchie trade and i think it gets done.
Feb. 12, 2022 at 3:47 p.m.
#7
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 19,750
Likes: 7,382
Quoting: Leafsleaks123
Not true. Kerfoot was excellent as the second line center last year, but we were rolling out guys like Riley Nash, Joe Thornton, and Alex Galchenyuk who aren’t NHL players in the top nine. On defence, Sandin can cover Muzzin or Reilly just fine, the glaring hole is clearly a defensemen who can be trusted at any moment on the right side


very true. Kerfoot was good, but he did not replace tavares, and in this case you'd get kerfoot being worse than tavares and motte being worse than Kerfoot both too high up the lineup.
The leafs do not need bottom roster players, they need guys who can push ones they have down. This has been the issue for years, Gardiner, Kadri, tavares, muzzin etc. they need higher end players for insulation and bottom roster players do not help shield you near enough.
Feb. 12, 2022 at 3:48 p.m.
#8
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2021
Posts: 2,771
Likes: 1,386
VAN can get something for Schenn and Motte separately.
Feb. 12, 2022 at 4:04 p.m.
#9
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2018
Posts: 9,343
Likes: 2,252
Leafs should bring back Ron Hainsey, he was great with Reilly.
Feb. 12, 2022 at 4:30 p.m.
#10
Jaxon34
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2019
Posts: 584
Likes: 73
Quoting: JaredOfLondon
very true. Kerfoot was good, but he did not replace tavares, and in this case you'd get kerfoot being worse than tavares and motte being worse than Kerfoot both too high up the lineup.
The leafs do not need bottom roster players, they need guys who can push ones they have down. This has been the issue for years, Gardiner, Kadri, tavares, muzzin etc. they need higher end players for insulation and bottom roster players do not help shield you near enough.


Love to hear what you get then in the cap situation the Leafs are. Your always quick to rip on others, but would love to hear what you think the Leafs should do to improve.
Feb. 12, 2022 at 4:35 p.m.
#11
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 19,750
Likes: 7,382
Quoting: Leafs09
Love to hear what you get then in the cap situation the Leafs are. Your always quick to rip on others, but would love to hear what you think the Leafs should do to improve.


like i said, they should be looking for guys that create depth, not who are depth. If you cant find those guys then you shouldnt spend assets on low range guys who dont push the needle at all.
Every single year the leafs spend assets on 'depth' like schenn or motte and every year it hasnt worked. Like how many more times do you and others need to see that spending picks and prospects on low end guys does nothing?
Feb. 12, 2022 at 4:47 p.m.
#12
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2020
Posts: 8,634
Likes: 3,931
Quoting: JaredOfLondon
like i said, they should be looking for guys that create depth, not who are depth. If you cant find those guys then you shouldnt spend assets on low range guys who dont push the needle at all.
Every single year the leafs spend assets on 'depth' like schenn or motte and every year it hasnt worked. Like how many more times do you and others need to see that spending picks and prospects on low end guys does nothing?


Well there is a thing called a salary cap which Toronto has been hard up against for years adding anything more than depth guys require moving out core parts of the roster which I’m not sure any leafs fan should think as a good idea so adding depth guys is the only and best option they have it really does come down to being that simple.
Leafs09 and Leafsleaks123 liked this.
Feb. 12, 2022 at 4:48 p.m.
#13
Jaxon34
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2019
Posts: 584
Likes: 73
Quoting: JaredOfLondon
like i said, they should be looking for guys that create depth, not who are depth. If you cant find those guys then you shouldnt spend assets on low range guys who dont push the needle at all.
Every single year the leafs spend assets on 'depth' like schenn or motte and every year it hasnt worked. Like how many more times do you and others need to see that spending picks and prospects on low end guys does nothing?


Looking for who you think?
They are strapped with the cap. So curious who you think they should go after and giving up what?
Feb. 12, 2022 at 4:49 p.m.
#14
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 24,997
Likes: 7,855
Quoting: Nate
I really like Motte but he is not better than Simmonds, Engvall, Spezza, or Mikheyev. Not sure where he fits


As the 13th forward. I am fine with that. Schenn as the 7/8 defenceman is good as well.
Feb. 12, 2022 at 4:51 p.m.
#15
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 24,997
Likes: 7,855
Quoting: Leafsleaks123
He’s better than Simmonds, but the whole point is just adding depth so we don’t have to call up someone like Joey Anderson when injuries inevitably happen


Simmonds has one of the best expected goals for per 60 in the NHL. Simmonds has been great. Motte is the 13th forward.
Feb. 12, 2022 at 4:51 p.m.
#16
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 19,750
Likes: 7,382
Quoting: Timmah007
Well there is a thing called a salary cap which Toronto has been hard up against for years adding anything more than depth guys require moving out core parts of the roster which I’m not sure any leafs fan should think as a good idea so adding depth guys is the only and best option they have it really does come down to being that simple.


woah really!?!?!?! crazy! So maybe instead of doing the same thing over and over again that never works, the leafs can keep the picks and prospects and not waste them on pieces that dont actually make them better and then either get more creative with the cap in the off season or draft and develop cheap talent.
It really is that simple, and if you look at 99.9% of deadline moves, they are generally just throwing away futures for guys that dont help and the ones that do work are for guys that actually create depth on a team.
Feb. 12, 2022 at 4:52 p.m.
#17
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 24,997
Likes: 7,855
Quoting: JaredOfLondon
how does tyler motte help if a guy like John tavares gets injured?


He doesn't but who do you pickup to fix that? Giroux I guess but the cost will be high. However getting a better 13th forward isn't a bad idea. Clifford sucks
Feb. 12, 2022 at 4:57 p.m.
#18
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 19,750
Likes: 7,382
Quoting: Leafs09
Looking for who you think?
They are strapped with the cap. So curious who you think they should go after and giving up what?


well it depends what is available and for how much. Cap strapped is not exactly something that is impossible to move around, especially when you have guys with salary who can go the other way and have banked deadline space you can use up, and it's weird to point out 'cap strapped' when part of this trade is adding over 2 million in cap for bottom roster players.
players i'd target that would actually move the needle include, giroux, Hertle, Rackell, Demelo, Severson etc etc, so basically the good players everyone here posts every day about, just without the insane over pays that generally go along with them.
what would i give up? For Hertle it's basically a 1st, Amirov like prospect player like Mikheyev and more, a guy like demelo would be considerably less.
Feb. 12, 2022 at 4:58 p.m.
#19
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 19,750
Likes: 7,382
Quoting: PleaseBanMeForMyOwnGood
He doesn't but who do you pickup to fix that? Giroux I guess but the cost will be high. However getting a better 13th forward isn't a bad idea. Clifford sucks


well by definition most 13th forwards suck. and if you can get a good 4th liner like Motte for what he's worth to your team (IE a 4th) then that's fine too. but the issue is giving up 2nds or more for guys that dont make the team noticably better
Feb. 12, 2022 at 4:58 p.m.
#20
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 24,997
Likes: 7,855
Quoting: Leafsleaks123
Not true. Kerfoot was excellent as the second line center last year, but we were rolling out guys like Riley Nash, Joe Thornton, and Alex Galchenyuk who aren’t NHL players in the top nine. On defence, Sandin can cover Muzzin or Reilly just fine, the glaring hole is clearly a defensemen who can be trusted at any moment on the right side


There really are only 2 options available to upgrade RD. Klingberg and Severson. All other options are either not better than Holl or not much of an improvement where the cost is way too much for the marginal upgrade.
Feb. 12, 2022 at 5:04 p.m.
#21
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 24,997
Likes: 7,855
Quoting: JaredOfLondon
like i said, they should be looking for guys that create depth, not who are depth. If you cant find those guys then you shouldnt spend assets on low range guys who dont push the needle at all.
Every single year the leafs spend assets on 'depth' like schenn or motte and every year it hasnt worked. Like how many more times do you and others need to see that spending picks and prospects on low end guys does nothing?


I am not sure that's entirely true. Sometimes adding a depth guy can pay off in a big way. Especially if you go deeper. I think having a better guy than Clifford for the 13th forward is a great idea. I also really want to see a better 8th defenceman because when injuries happen having better decent players helps. Obviously you can't replace a Matthews or any of the core 4 but you can't really replace them anyways. Hope for good health and prepare the best you can.
Feb. 12, 2022 at 5:04 p.m.
#22
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 24,997
Likes: 7,855
Quoting: JaredOfLondon
well by definition most 13th forwards suck. and if you can get a good 4th liner like Motte for what he's worth to your team (IE a 4th) then that's fine too. but the issue is giving up 2nds or more for guys that dont make the team noticably better


Yeah I agree completely. Most of the trades on here are massive overpays
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll