SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

TDL Cal

Created by: Apinaorkesteri3000
Team: 2021-22 Calgary Flames
Initial Creation Date: Mar. 16, 2022
Published: Mar. 16, 2022
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
Depth D and better second/third line center. Gudbranson cap dumb somewhere
Trades
1.
2.
MTL
  1. Zary, Connor
  2. 2022 5th round pick (CGY)
  3. 2023 3rd round pick (CGY)
3.
CGY
  1. 2022 6th round pick (ARI)
ARI
  1. Gudbranson, Erik
  2. 2022 7th round pick (CGY)
Buyouts
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2022
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the FLA
Logo of the ARI
2023
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
2024
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
21$81,500,000$70,337,500$0$0$11,162,500
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$7,000,000$7,000,000
RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$4,850,000$4,850,000
C, RW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$2,125,000$2,125,000
RW, LW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$6,750,000$6,750,000
LW
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$5,625,000$5,625,000
C
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$2,425,000$2,425,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$2,300,000$2,300,000
LW, RW, C
RFA - 3
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$5,350,000$5,350,000
C
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$4,900,000$4,900,000
RW, LW
NTC
UFA - 6
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$5,250,000$5,250,000
LW, RW
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$800,000$800,000
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$800,000$800,000
RW, C
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$1,237,500$1,237,500
LD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$4,550,000$4,550,000
RD
UFA - 5
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$6,000,000$6,000,000
G
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$750,000$750,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$1,125,000$1,125,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$750,000$750,000
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$3,750,000$3,750,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$1,750,000$1,750,000
LD/RD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$750,000$750,000
RD
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Mar. 16, 2022 at 8:07 p.m.
#26
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2019
Posts: 14,042
Likes: 5,158
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
But you make that statement based on nothing, Zadorov has played far better this year and so has Gudbranson. The only viable argument you've made is QoC and that just means you can only speculate how much better Chiarot would be in a sheltered role.

Why would he be used more than Kylington? He is one of the more mobile defensemen in the league and is significantly better offensively


He got traded to FLO we’re good now
Ledge_And_Dairy liked this.
Mar. 16, 2022 at 8:12 p.m.
#27
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 38,575
Likes: 19,706
Quoting: GMs
He got traded to FLO we’re good now


Sounds like Flames acquired Lindholm's cousin too (Jarnkrok). This makes a lot more sense for their teams needs as they currently have Lewis playing with Coleman and Backlund on the "2nd line"
GMs liked this.
Mar. 16, 2022 at 8:23 p.m.
#28
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2019
Posts: 14,042
Likes: 5,158
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
Sounds like Flames acquired Lindholm's cousin too (Jarnkrok). This makes a lot more sense for their teams needs as they currently have Lewis playing with Coleman and Backlund on the "2nd line"


MTL got an excellent return and FLO 2nd will probably be a late one so good on CAL
Mar. 16, 2022 at 9:27 p.m.
#29
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2021
Posts: 2,170
Likes: 903
Quoting: GMs
I will just say that Chiarot is better than Zadorov & Gudbranson by a large margin & could be used more than Kylington. Or maybe 3rd pairing instead of Zadorov and if an injury occurs, than you got someone who can play easily on the top 4 (because Zadorov isn’t good enough). But again, I understand you guys not welling to pay an hefty price for Chiarot. I wouldn’t trade a 1st alone for him, but he isn’t bad like you pretend. Maybe a 50ish pick is fine for him, but that’s it. Unfortunately for the team acquiring him, they will overpay


No one here has doubted that a team will over pay, we just watched it happen. The doubt was Pelletier and a 1st and the doubt was in the need for the Flames, Zadorov and Gudbranson have been significantly better, doesn’t mean Chiarot is a worse player, he’s been worse this year. Made zero sense
Mar. 16, 2022 at 10:07 p.m.
#30
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2019
Posts: 14,042
Likes: 5,158
Quoting: yycofred
No one here has doubted that a team will over pay, we just watched it happen. The doubt was Pelletier and a 1st and the doubt was in the need for the Flames, Zadorov and Gudbranson have been significantly better, doesn’t mean Chiarot is a worse player, he’s been worse this year. Made zero sense


Not because Zadorov & Gudbranson have been good this year means they have been better hockey player than Chiarot this year. Again, it was for Pelletier alone, not WITH a 1st RD pick
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll