Three trades to more easily show fair costs for good players. The cost for Manson shows it's not going to take a ransom for Lindholm (aka adding Knies to that package). However good players obviously cost assets and as long as the Leafs hang on to Knies and only spend one 1st, it's fine. I assume Amirov has minimal value at the moment.
Lines explanation:
First line is Auston and friends, you can't leave him alone, so he's gonna draw top defensive matchups. Mitch or no Mitch, he's gonna be dangerous.
Second line adds Marner to help JT and then Kase is a volume shooter and energy guy playing with two very smart players that can get him the puck to shoot from open ice.
Third line is depth scoring that doesn't handle much defensive work, Kerfoot can handle it alright to cover for the other two. Swap wingers around if you like. Think of it like the Pens HBK line, if you match your top D guys against Matthews and Tavares you're gonna leave Nylander and co to feast on bottom six competition.
Fourth line only plays shutdown minutes and can do that at an elite level.
Double shift Marner and Nylander beside Matthews to start periods or after a penalty kill, or when down a goal, to help balance out minutes.
Defense pairs:
Shuffle them around depending on health and preferred sides, there's enough good players to be able to tolerate one injury and on a healthy night, one legitimate NHLer is going to be in the press box.
Goalie: Campbell will turn it around somewhat, Stolarz is a fine backup, Kallgren is also an option if he can keep it up. Can send Sandin to the AHL to make cap room for Kallgren, or waive Simmonds since it's unlikely he's taken anyway.
Comtois and his 3 goals is definitely better next to Matthews than Marner. Geez
Do you trust a third line against Matthews even without Marner? I'd think not. Pick a shift at random from the past two months and it'll show Matthews on an absolute mission, constantly hounding the puck and creating offense.
Comtois isn't amazing but he'll hit and muck about and get elevated by Matthews. He just needs to stand near the net and shove some guys. Can't be worse than Ritchie, right?
Do you trust a third line against Matthews even without Marner? I'd think not. Pick a shift at random from the past two months and it'll show Matthews on an absolute mission, constantly hounding the puck and creating offense.
Comtois isn't amazing but he'll hit and muck about and get elevated by Matthews. He just needs to stand near the net and shove some guys. Can't be worse than Ritchie, right?
No it can't be worse than Ritchie. But it can and would be, much much worse than Marner.
No it can't be worse than Ritchie. But it can and would be, much much worse than Marner.
Yes, obviously. But the current setup is like a 10/10 line, a 6, a 8 (with minimal offense), and a 4. My proposed lines (granted, after trade additions) are a 9 (any line with Matthews is at least a 8), a 8 or 9, a 6 or 7, and a 8 (defensively).
Lindholm trade is okay. You might even be able to leave Dermott out of it.
Those are the wrong elements for Rakell, and we don't really know what Comtois' ceiling is -- is it the team-leading scorer we saw last season, or the guy having trouble rehabbing his injury this season? -- so we won't be trading him prematurely.
A 2022 second and a decent prospect is a good deal for Stolarz. I think you guys may be forced to pay that price due to your current condition.
Yes, obviously. But the current setup is like a 10/10 line, a 6, a 8 (with minimal offense), and a 4. My proposed lines (granted, after trade additions) are a 9 (any line with Matthews is at least a 8), a 8 or 9, a 6 or 7, and a 8 (defensively).