SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Brekel's Mock Offseason (version 1)

Created by: BreKel
Team: 2017-18 Boston Bruins
Initial Creation Date: Apr. 24, 2017
Published: Apr. 24, 2017
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
So I'm obviously going to mess around with this a lot over the next few months. We'll have a better idea come free agency on the roster with the expansion/entry drafts. Until the cap is set for next season, I will increase by 1M (in hopes it goes up that much).
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
7$6,000,000
2$850,000
2$950,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
5$6,000,000
Trades
1.
BOS
    Selected in the 2017 NHL Expansion Draft
    VGK
    1. Beleskey, Matt
    2. 2018 2nd round pick (BOS)
    Additional Details:
    The Bruins send a high-round draft pick to the VGK to take Beleskey on. The pick is a year later in a stronger draft, and will help Vegas build up their prospect pool. Boston gets out of a 3.8M contract.
    2.
    BOS
      2017 3rd Round Pick

      Explanation: In a weak draft, DAL already has 3 picks in the first two rounds. McQuaid is still a very serviceable bottom pairiing defenseman who can play on the PK. Dallas was the 2nd worst defensive team in the league.
      3.
      ANA
      1. Vatrano, Frank
      2. Zboril, Jakub
      Additional Details:
      2017 1st Round Pick
      RFA Rights to Ryan Spooner
      4.
      BOS
        2017 5th Round Pick
        Buyouts
        Buried
        DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
        2018
        Logo of the BOS
        Logo of the BOS
        Logo of the BOS
        Logo of the BOS
        Logo of the BOS
        2019
        Logo of the BOS
        Logo of the BOS
        Logo of the BOS
        Logo of the BOS
        Logo of the BOS
        Logo of the BOS
        Logo of the BOS
        2020
        Logo of the BOS
        Logo of the BOS
        Logo of the BOS
        Logo of the BOS
        Logo of the BOS
        Logo of the BOS
        Logo of the BOS
        ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
        22$74,000,000$71,362,918$0$1,247,500$2,637,082
        Left WingCentreRight Wing
        $6,125,000$6,125,000
        LW
        NMC
        UFA - 8
        $6,875,000$6,875,000
        C
        NMC
        UFA - 5
        $6,000,000$6,000,000
        RW
        UFA - 6
        $863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$400,000$400K)
        RW, LW
        UFA - 3
        $7,250,000$7,250,000
        C
        NMC
        UFA - 4
        $6,000,000$6,000,000
        RW
        UFA - 8
        $742,500$742,500 (Performance Bonus$182,500$182K)
        LW, RW
        RFA - 2
        $916,667$916,667
        RW, C
        RFA - 2
        $4,500,000$4,500,000
        C, RW
        NMC
        UFA - 4
        $808,750$808,750
        C, LW
        UFA - 1
        $900,000$900,000
        C, RW
        UFA - 1
        $850,000$850,000
        C, RW
        UFA - 2
        $784,167$784,167 (Performance Bonus$57,500$58K)
        LW, RW
        UFA - 1
        Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
        $4,000,000$4,000,000
        LD
        NMC
        UFA - 1
        $916,667$916,667 (Performance Bonus$500,000$500K)
        RD
        UFA - 2
        $7,000,000$7,000,000
        G
        M-NTC
        UFA - 4
        $4,000,000$4,000,000
        LD/RD
        UFA - 1
        $789,167$789,167 (Performance Bonus$107,500$108K)
        RD
        UFA - 2
        $5,250,000$5,250,000
        LD
        UFA - 3
        $2,500,000$2,500,000
        RD
        UFA - 3
        $950,000$950,000
        G
        UFA - 2
        $1,000,000$1,000,000
        RD
        UFA - 1

        Embed Code

        • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
        • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

        Text-Embed

        Click to Highlight
        Apr. 24, 2017 at 7:53 p.m.
        #1
        BreKel
        Avatar of the user
        Joined: May 2016
        Posts: 3,537
        Likes: 460
        This will easily be my most unrealistic mock for the offseason. I do think it's interesting that you could theoretically ice a pretty solid team if the Bruins could shed some contracts. I don't think any of the moves are unrealistic, more-so all of it happening in one offseason. I'll take the backlash from you guys haha. A year later you'd roughly be looking at 12-13M (didn't factor in a potential cap increase) to re-sign Fowler and find some bottom 6 players. Obviously this lineup has some fire power, but the left side is pretty unknown and boom or bust. That defense would be a lot of fun to watch though. Have at it haha
        Apr. 24, 2017 at 7:58 p.m.
        #2
        Leafs Rule
        Avatar of the user
        Joined: Apr. 2017
        Posts: 316
        Likes: 15
        Quoting: BreKel
        This will easily be my most unrealistic mock for the offseason. I do think it's interesting that you could theoretically ice a pretty solid team if the Bruins could shed some contracts. I don't think any of the moves are unrealistic, more-so all of it happening in one offseason. I'll take the backlash from you guys haha. A year later you'd roughly be looking at 12-13M (didn't factor in a potential cap increase) to re-sign Fowler and find some bottom 6 players. Obviously this lineup has some fire power, but the left side is pretty unknown and boom or bust. That defense would be a lot of fun to watch though. Have at it haha


        Oshie is a bad contract. Your trades are nice, but Fowler won't go for that little. Plus if you get Fowler you will be cap poor after next season as you have $60M tied already for 2018-19 and Fowler needing a contract, plus Riley Nash and you will only have $6M after you sign Fowler for $7M to spend on Nash and 4 more.
        Apr. 24, 2017 at 8:05 p.m.
        #3
        Avatar of the user
        Joined: Apr. 2016
        Posts: 1,529
        Likes: 126
        1) I think it's slated to go up 1 mil so you're right there. I think they were talking about a 2 mil increase but players don't want that because of the escrow involved so I think a 1 mil increase is pretty realistic.
        2) McQuaid is a pretty good fit for Dallas especially if he ends out being partnered with Lindell or Honka. Idk if they accept a 3rd but I think a pick gets it done.
        3) Steep price for Beleskey but I honestly think that's their only option. No other team would want to take Beleskey on.
        4) Fowler's a pretty good move but by the sounds of it they're shopping Vatanen 1st so we'll see
        5) I think Hayes goes for nothing as a waiver claim
        6) Pretty crazy that enough cap was free'd up for Oshie. Good signing but makes me worried about a few years down the line with McAvoy, Carlo, Fowler needing to be signed even though Chara would be coming off the cap. If Bruins want a cheaper 2 year option I say they go with Sharp but thats just my opinion.
        Apr. 24, 2017 at 8:07 p.m.
        #4
        Thread Starter
        BreKel
        Avatar of the user
        Joined: May 2016
        Posts: 3,537
        Likes: 460
        Quoting: Dragongrave
        Quoting: BreKel
        This will easily be my most unrealistic mock for the offseason. I do think it's interesting that you could theoretically ice a pretty solid team if the Bruins could shed some contracts. I don't think any of the moves are unrealistic, more-so all of it happening in one offseason. I'll take the backlash from you guys haha. A year later you'd roughly be looking at 12-13M (didn't factor in a potential cap increase) to re-sign Fowler and find some bottom 6 players. Obviously this lineup has some fire power, but the left side is pretty unknown and boom or bust. That defense would be a lot of fun to watch though. Have at it haha


        Oshie is a bad contract. Your trades are nice, but Fowler won't go for that little. Plus if you get Fowler you will be cap poor after next season as you have $60M tied already for 2018-19 and Fowler needing a contract, plus Riley Nash and you will only have $6M after you sign Fowler for $7M to spend on Nash and 4 more.


        What do you think Fowler is going to get in a trade? That deal is giving them a top end LHD prospect, a 1st, and two forwards with some upside (one being a 40-50 point centerman in the NHL). So 7M to sign Fowler, and then 6M to replace 2 4th line forwards? I doubt Kuraly (if he had a good season) would break the bank much. Nash is replaceable. The Bruins have guys in their system who could come up and fill his role the year after this, or just sign another cheap bottom 6 forward for under 1M. Then the remaining spots are a bottom 6 defenseman (once again, a position that can be filled in-house) and two extra players (1D and 1F) -- two positions that arent' back breakers.

        Oshie isn't a great contract down the road, but he's still a very good player who could fit with Bergeron and Marchand perfectly. He'd be 35 at the time that deal ends. Is his game really going to fall off a cliff by then?

        Seems like you're commenting without much knowledge on the Bruins. 6M isn't a lot to replace the pieces they'd need after this hypothetical season.
        Apr. 24, 2017 at 8:09 p.m.
        #5
        Thread Starter
        BreKel
        Avatar of the user
        Joined: May 2016
        Posts: 3,537
        Likes: 460
        Quoting: DirtyRebound
        1) I think it's slated to go up 1 mil so you're right there. I think they were talking about a 2 mil increase but players don't want that because of the escrow involved so I think a 1 mil increase is pretty realistic.
        2) McQuaid is a pretty good fit for Dallas especially if he ends out being partnered with Lindell or Honka. Idk if they accept a 3rd but I think a pick gets it done.
        3) Steep price for Beleskey but I honestly think that's their only option. No other team would want to take Beleskey on.
        4) Fowler's a pretty good move but by the sounds of it they're shopping Vatanen 1st so we'll see
        5) I think Hayes goes for nothing as a waiver claim
        6) Pretty crazy that enough cap was free'd up for Oshie. Good signing but makes me worried about a few years down the line with McAvoy, Carlo, Fowler needing to be signed even though Chara would be coming off the cap. If Bruins want a cheaper 2 year option I say they go with Sharp but thats just my opinion.


        Yeah I went for the "big fish" winger for the offseason. I'd easily settle for a cheaper veteran option and save some money down the road. Wonder what Justin Williams gets? He'd be an even better fit.
        Apr. 24, 2017 at 8:11 p.m.
        #6
        Avatar of the user
        Joined: Apr. 2016
        Posts: 1,529
        Likes: 126
        Quoting: BreKel
        Quoting: DirtyRebound
        1) I think it's slated to go up 1 mil so you're right there. I think they were talking about a 2 mil increase but players don't want that because of the escrow involved so I think a 1 mil increase is pretty realistic.
        2) McQuaid is a pretty good fit for Dallas especially if he ends out being partnered with Lindell or Honka. Idk if they accept a 3rd but I think a pick gets it done.
        3) Steep price for Beleskey but I honestly think that's their only option. No other team would want to take Beleskey on.
        4) Fowler's a pretty good move but by the sounds of it they're shopping Vatanen 1st so we'll see
        5) I think Hayes goes for nothing as a waiver claim
        6) Pretty crazy that enough cap was free'd up for Oshie. Good signing but makes me worried about a few years down the line with McAvoy, Carlo, Fowler needing to be signed even though Chara would be coming off the cap. If Bruins want a cheaper 2 year option I say they go with Sharp but thats just my opinion.


        Yeah I went for the "big fish" winger for the offseason. I'd easily settle for a cheaper veteran option and save some money down the road. Wonder what Justin Williams gets? He'd be an even better fit.


        That's another guy in the same "genre" yea. I think he'll get a bit more than Sharp because he's been pretty healthy for the past couple years and depending on if he's "Mr. Game 7" this playoffs again will only increase his value.
        Apr. 24, 2017 at 8:24 p.m.
        #7
        Leafs Rule
        Avatar of the user
        Joined: Apr. 2017
        Posts: 316
        Likes: 15
        Quoting: BreKel
        Quoting: Dragongrave


        Oshie is a bad contract. Your trades are nice, but Fowler won't go for that little. Plus if you get Fowler you will be cap poor after next season as you have $60M tied already for 2018-19 and Fowler needing a contract, plus Riley Nash and you will only have $6M after you sign Fowler for $7M to spend on Nash and 4 more.


        What do you think Fowler is going to get in a trade? That deal is giving them a top end LHD prospect, a 1st, and two forwards with some upside (one being a 40-50 point centerman in the NHL). So 7M to sign Fowler, and then 6M to replace 2 4th line forwards? I doubt Kuraly (if he had a good season) would break the bank much. Nash is replaceable. The Bruins have guys in their system who could come up and fill his role the year after this, or just sign another cheap bottom 6 forward for under 1M. Then the remaining spots are a bottom 6 defenseman (once again, a position that can be filled in-house) and two extra players (1D and 1F) -- two positions that arent' back breakers.

        Oshie isn't a great contract down the road, but he's still a very good player who could fit with Bergeron and Marchand perfectly. He'd be 35 at the time that deal ends. Is his game really going to fall off a cliff by then?

        Seems like you're commenting without much knowledge on the Bruins. 6M isn't a lot to replace the pieces they'd need after this hypothetical season.


        Quoting: BreKel
        Quoting: Dragongrave


        Oshie is a bad contract. Your trades are nice, but Fowler won't go for that little. Plus if you get Fowler you will be cap poor after next season as you have $60M tied already for 2018-19 and Fowler needing a contract, plus Riley Nash and you will only have $6M after you sign Fowler for $7M to spend on Nash and 4 more.


        What do you think Fowler is going to get in a trade? That deal is giving them a top end LHD prospect, a 1st, and two forwards with some upside (one being a 40-50 point centerman in the NHL). So 7M to sign Fowler, and then 6M to replace 2 4th line forwards? I doubt Kuraly (if he had a good season) would break the bank much. Nash is replaceable. The Bruins have guys in their system who could come up and fill his role the year after this, or just sign another cheap bottom 6 forward for under 1M. Then the remaining spots are a bottom 6 defenseman (once again, a position that can be filled in-house) and two extra players (1D and 1F) -- two positions that arent' back breakers.

        Oshie isn't a great contract down the road, but he's still a very good player who could fit with Bergeron and Marchand perfectly. He'd be 35 at the time that deal ends. Is his game really going to fall off a cliff by then?

        Seems like you're commenting without much knowledge on the Bruins. 6M isn't a lot to replace the pieces they'd need after this hypothetical season.


        What I'm talking about is their cap situation that YOU are putting them in.

        You will have next year $50M tied into 7 guys and if you get Fowler for let's say $6M, you're at $56M for 8 players, you still need 14 players and only have $17M of cap space, you have top guys and bottom guys and nothing in the middle.
        Apr. 24, 2017 at 8:34 p.m.
        #8
        Avatar of the user
        Joined: Apr. 2016
        Posts: 1,529
        Likes: 126
        @Dragongrave

        Cap situation would be tight but Oshie doesn't need to be the guy signed in that case. Could easily go out and sign a vet RW for 2 years like Sharp, Williams, Marleau.
        Moog121 liked this.
        Apr. 24, 2017 at 8:36 p.m.
        #9
        Leafs Rule
        Avatar of the user
        Joined: Apr. 2017
        Posts: 316
        Likes: 15
        Quoting: DirtyRebound
        @Dragongrave

        Cap situation would be tight but Oshie doesn't need to be the guy signed in that case. Could easily go out and sign a vet RW for 2 years like Sharp, Williams, Marleau.


        Agreed. Just saying what he has done will screw up their cap going forward.

        Oshie is going to be the big winner in free agency, the team that signs him will be the big loser because they will be the next Eriksson.
        Apr. 24, 2017 at 8:51 p.m.
        #10
        Avatar of the user
        Joined: Apr. 2016
        Posts: 1,529
        Likes: 126
        Quoting: Dragongrave
        Quoting: DirtyRebound
        @Dragongrave

        Cap situation would be tight but Oshie doesn't need to be the guy signed in that case. Could easily go out and sign a vet RW for 2 years like Sharp, Williams, Marleau.


        Agreed. Just saying what he has done will screw up their cap going forward.

        Oshie is going to be the big winner in free agency, the team that signs him will be the big loser because they will be the next Eriksson.


        I think that could be true. Only time will tell but you're right, he could be the next Eriksson.
        Apr. 24, 2017 at 8:53 p.m.
        #11
        Leafs Rule
        Avatar of the user
        Joined: Apr. 2017
        Posts: 316
        Likes: 15
        Quoting: DirtyRebound
        Quoting: Dragongrave


        Agreed. Just saying what he has done will screw up their cap going forward.

        Oshie is going to be the big winner in free agency, the team that signs him will be the big loser because they will be the next Eriksson.


        I think that could be true. Only time will tell but you're right, he could be the next Eriksson.


        Signing a 30 year old to a 5-7 year deal for $6M per year always works well. Eriksson, Clarkson, and so many earned those deals, lol.
        Apr. 24, 2017 at 8:59 p.m.
        #12
        Avatar of the user
        Joined: Apr. 2016
        Posts: 1,529
        Likes: 126
        Quoting: Dragongrave
        Quoting: DirtyRebound


        I think that could be true. Only time will tell but you're right, he could be the next Eriksson.


        Signing a 30 year old to a 5-7 year deal for $6M per year always works well. Eriksson, Clarkson, and so many earned those deals, lol.


        The one thing I'll give Oshie is that he's actually willing to give more to win than Erikkson does so I mean signing him would be good the first year for a team actually competing but other than that it's just going to be a bad situation.
        Apr. 24, 2017 at 9:00 p.m.
        #13
        Leafs Rule
        Avatar of the user
        Joined: Apr. 2017
        Posts: 316
        Likes: 15
        Quoting: DirtyRebound


        The one thing I'll give Oshie is that he's actually willing to give more to win than Erikkson does so I mean signing him would be good the first year for a team actually competing but other than that it's just going to be a bad situation.


        So why put yourself in that situation if you're Boston? Makes no sense.
        Apr. 24, 2017 at 9:33 p.m.
        #14
        Avatar of the user
        Joined: Apr. 2016
        Posts: 1,529
        Likes: 126
        Quoting: Dragongrave
        Quoting: DirtyRebound


        The one thing I'll give Oshie is that he's actually willing to give more to win than Erikkson does so I mean signing him would be good the first year for a team actually competing but other than that it's just going to be a bad situation.


        So why put yourself in that situation if you're Boston? Makes no sense.


        Once again I agree that the veteran root is probably better.
        Apr. 24, 2017 at 9:34 p.m.
        #15
        Leafs Rule
        Avatar of the user
        Joined: Apr. 2017
        Posts: 316
        Likes: 15
        Quoting: DirtyRebound
        Quoting: Dragongrave


        So why put yourself in that situation if you're Boston? Makes no sense.


        Once again I agree that the veteran root is probably better.


        I like the Justin Williams idea, he's older and will cost you less $$ and less time.
        Apr. 24, 2017 at 9:38 p.m.
        #16
        Avatar of the user
        Joined: Apr. 2016
        Posts: 1,529
        Likes: 126
        Quoting: Dragongrave
        Quoting: DirtyRebound


        Once again I agree that the veteran root is probably better.


        I like the Justin Williams idea, he's older and will cost you less $$ and less time.




        I think he'd be a pretty good fit with the Bruins. Only issue is his contract will depend on how much more success he has in this playoffs right, so he's one we'll have to wait and see.
        Apr. 24, 2017 at 9:40 p.m.
        #17
        Leafs Rule
        Avatar of the user
        Joined: Apr. 2017
        Posts: 316
        Likes: 15
        Quoting: DirtyRebound
        Quoting: Dragongrave


        I like the Justin Williams idea, he's older and will cost you less $$ and less time.




        I think he'd be a pretty good fit with the Bruins. Only issue is his contract will depend on how much more success he has in this playoffs right, so he's one we'll have to wait and see.


        True.
        Apr. 24, 2017 at 9:46 p.m.
        #18
        Moog121
        Avatar of the user
        Joined: Aug. 2015
        Posts: 143
        Likes: 7
        I like the shedding of salary and aggressiveness to obtain a top pair LHD that can play with McAvoy. While Oshie would help short term I would rather see them sign vets in the 2-3M range for 1-2 years so B's have flexibility till the kids are ready like Debrusk, Senyshyn, Heinen, Cehlarik, and Bjork. Maybe Stafford, Vrbata, Vanek, etc. I really like RFA LW Tanner Pearson with the Kings or try to pry Coyle from the Wild who might take futures to alleviate cap crunch. Should be a fun offseason.
        Apr. 25, 2017 at 7:59 a.m.
        #19
        Avatar of the user
        Joined: May 2016
        Posts: 11,517
        Likes: 4,566
        I like the idea behind it. I'm think I'd stay away from Oshie for that cap hit. I think the Fowler deal is close for a guy whose a UFA next season. Probably would have to swap out someone like Spooner for DeBrusk, but all in all not bad.
        Apr. 25, 2017 at 8:02 a.m.
        #20
        Thread Starter
        BreKel
        Avatar of the user
        Joined: May 2016
        Posts: 3,537
        Likes: 460
        Quoting: ON3M4N
        I like the idea behind it. I'm think I'd stay away from Oshie for that cap hit. I think the Fowler deal is close for a guy whose a UFA next season. Probably would have to swap out someone like Spooner for DeBrusk, but all in all not bad.


        Yeah after signing Oshie I realized the Bruins could get better "bang for their buck" signing a veteran for cheaper and less term.

        Thanks for the feedback.
        Apr. 25, 2017 at 8:03 a.m.
        #21
        Leafs Rule
        Avatar of the user
        Joined: Apr. 2017
        Posts: 316
        Likes: 15
        Quoting: BreKel
        Quoting: ON3M4N
        I like the idea behind it. I'm think I'd stay away from Oshie for that cap hit. I think the Fowler deal is close for a guy whose a UFA next season. Probably would have to swap out someone like Spooner for DeBrusk, but all in all not bad.


        Yeah after signing Oshie I realized the Bruins could get better "bang for their buck" signing a veteran for cheaper and less term.

        Thanks for the feedback.


        True, but your cap will always be messed up and any "kids" that become stars you won't have the $$ to sign them.
        Apr. 25, 2017 at 8:07 a.m.
        #22
        Thread Starter
        BreKel
        Avatar of the user
        Joined: May 2016
        Posts: 3,537
        Likes: 460
        Quoting: Dragongrave
        Quoting: BreKel


        Yeah after signing Oshie I realized the Bruins could get better "bang for their buck" signing a veteran for cheaper and less term.

        Thanks for the feedback.


        True, but your cap will always be messed up and any "kids" that become stars you won't have the $$ to sign them.


        If the Bruins went cheaper in this mock instead of Oshie how would the cap still be messed up? They don't have to worry about bigger pieces like Carlo and McAvoy until 2 years from this. Cap will go up and players deals will be up. Bruins have a deep system and they'll be able to continue to implement young players in the system.
        Apr. 25, 2017 at 12:42 p.m.
        #23
        Avatar of the user
        Joined: Jan. 2017
        Posts: 19,882
        Likes: 8,874
        I like it
        BreKel liked this.
         
        Reply
        To create a post please Login or Register
        Question:
        Options:
        Add Option
        Submit Poll