well im defenitly not arguing that he is worth that package, he is not imo. all im saying is the fact someone was picked up on waiver at some point is a bit relevant qhen you want to assess is tade value 6-9 months later, because other variables will be more important by that time. im not really sure qhat qe are arguing about, i just wanted to say that it was a bad argument to use in the first place '' he was on waiver a while ago, could have had him for free at starts of season blablabla''. what relevant is what he has done since, not that he was in waiver. but yeah, he is not worth tgat package at atll imo. maybe.one day!

Rem Pitlick was acquired off waivers Jan 12th, and we can only assess his possible change in value from then until today, so it's 3 months after acquisition, and trying to stretch it to 6-9 months does not make your argument stronger, it makes it weaker because you're being disingenuous with the time frame.

My point is, sugesting that I mentioned he was a waiver wire pickup was not just distracting from the main point, but incorrect. You can believe what you want, but waiver wire pickups are considered, "one mans trash" so to speak. He wasn't a top 14 forward.

And no he isn't "another mans treasure" either, he's depth