SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

What could have been

Created by: mikeyj007
Team: 2021-22 Vancouver Canucks
Initial Creation Date: May 19, 2022
Published: May 19, 2022
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Free Agent Signings
CREATEDYEARSCAP HIT
Virtanen, Jake
1$800,000
Trades
1.
2.
TOR
  1. Virtanen, Jake
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
Buyouts
Recapture Fees
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2022
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
2023
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
2024
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
22$81,500,000$73,038,859$648,780$1,687,500$8,461,141
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$7,000,000$7,000,000
RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$7,350,000$7,350,000
C, LW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$6,962,366$6,962,366
RW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$5,250,000$5,250,000
C, LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$4,125,000$4,125,000
C
UFA - 2
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$5,875,000$5,875,000
RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
RW, LW
RFA - 3
Logo of the Seattle Kraken
$2,940,000$2,940,000
C, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$2,125,000$2,125,000
RW, LW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$891,667$891,667 (Performance Bonus$200,000$200K)
LW, RW
RFA - 2
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$1,025,000$1,025,000
C, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the New York Rangers
$1,225,000$1,225,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$7,850,000$7,850,000
LD
UFA - 6
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$1,125,000$1,125,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$5,000,000$5,000,000
G
UFA - 5
Logo of the Florida Panthers
$2,666,667$2,666,667
LD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$894,167$894,167 (Performance Bonus$637,500$638K)
LD
RFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$800,000$800,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$1,500,000$1,500,000
LD/RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$850,000$850,000
RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Los Angeles Kings
$1,700,000$1,700,000
RD
UFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$725,000$725,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$3,500,000$3,500,000
LW, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$2,500,000$2,500,000
RD
UFA - 4
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$762,500$762,500
RD
UFA - 2

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
May 19, 2022 at 9:53 p.m.
#1
C,mon Leafs...Please
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2015
Posts: 836
Likes: 329
I have done these as a Leaf fan but some of mine were a bit nuts. This one of yours is surprisingly realistic in how it could/should have unfolded. It is a shame that the Vancouver management completely missed some obvious decisions. Wow...even though I am not a Canucks fan I still feel your pain as a fellow hockey fan.
May 19, 2022 at 10:14 p.m.
#2
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2022
Posts: 7,792
Likes: 4,483
Calgary laugh at that offer, Matt Tkachuk isn't going anywhere, And why in the hell would they want Oliver Ekman-Larsson?
May 19, 2022 at 10:27 p.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2022
Posts: 602
Likes: 228
Quoting: TampaBayLightning22
Calgary laugh at that offer, Matt Tkachuk isn't going anywhere, And why in the hell would they want Oliver Ekman-Larsson?


I think he's referring to the players the team could've drafted if they had a competent gm and also players they shouldn't have traded. If that's so, I agree with him. The Canucks would be so much better than right now with these players
nucksfan40 liked this.
May 19, 2022 at 10:29 p.m.
#4
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2022
Posts: 7,792
Likes: 4,483
Quoting: Angusc
I think he's referring to the players the team could've drafted if they had a competent gm and also players they shouldn't have traded. If that's so, I agree with him. The Canucks would be so much better than right now with these players


Yeah i think your right, Probably should've worded it a little better.
Angusc liked this.
May 19, 2022 at 10:33 p.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2020
Posts: 3,617
Likes: 1,319
Quoting: TampaBayLightning22
Calgary laugh at that offer, Matt Tkachuk isn't going anywhere, And why in the hell would they want Oliver Ekman-Larsson?


This post went right over your head didn't it?
BeautifulIdiot and NV94 liked this.
May 19, 2022 at 10:38 p.m.
#6
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2022
Posts: 602
Likes: 228
Quoting: TampaBayLightning22
Yeah i think your right, Probably should've worded it a little better.


That Virtanen pick was such a bust. Picking Pastranak or Nylander would have been better
May 19, 2022 at 10:39 p.m.
#7
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2022
Posts: 7,792
Likes: 4,483
Quoting: Mediumyeet
This post went right over your head didn't it?


Hardy because it wasn't explained correctly, All he said is what could've been.
May 19, 2022 at 10:42 p.m.
#8
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2022
Posts: 7,792
Likes: 4,483
Quoting: Angusc
That Virtanen pick was such a bust. Picking Pastranak or Nylander would have been better


Yeah all of us could've said that at one time, Ken Holland should've taken Quinn Hughes over Filip Zadina or Martin Necas over Michael Rasmussen.. Got screwed on the Jakob Chychrun deal with Dennis Cholowski and Filip Hronek 50/50 hind sight.
Knuckl3s liked this.
May 19, 2022 at 10:45 p.m.
#9
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2021
Posts: 450
Likes: 181
Quoting: Angusc
I think he's referring to the players the team could've drafted if they had a competent gm and also players they shouldn't have traded. If that's so, I agree with him. The Canucks would be so much better than right now with these players


he is idk why everyone doesnt get it lol
BeautifulIdiot liked this.
May 19, 2022 at 10:46 p.m.
#10
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2021
Posts: 450
Likes: 181
only if benning took tkuachk over juolevi.
tkuachk-petersson-boeser
what a nasty line. tkuachk to protect the others and actually has skill. what couldve been frown
BeautifulIdiot liked this.
May 19, 2022 at 10:54 p.m.
#11
H.Lindholm Lover
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2021
Posts: 3,598
Likes: 921
this, this is so bad
May 19, 2022 at 10:59 p.m.
#12
This team kills me
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2021
Posts: 3,251
Likes: 1,511
stop twisting the knife
May 19, 2022 at 11:00 p.m.
#13
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2021
Posts: 1,156
Likes: 581
This probably isn’t even half of what actually could have been with a competent management. Benning was awful from the very beginning
May 20, 2022 at 10:38 a.m.
#14
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2018
Posts: 393
Likes: 67
Saddest part for me is the D is still bad. Not even hindsight can change our back end! JK think of how many D they passed on in the draft past year one.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll