SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Tanev Deals

Created by: qwertymann
Team: 2016-17 Vancouver Canucks
Initial Creation Date: May 10, 2017
Published: May 10, 2017
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
Exploring all the Tanev Deals. Which is the most realistic/equal value?
Trades
1.
BUF
  1. Tanev, Christopher
Additional Details:
CBJ 2nd (59th OA)
2.
VAN
  1. 2017 1st round pick (BUF)
Additional Details:
8th OA
BUF
    Tanev
    3.
    VAN
    1. Kapanen, Kasperi
    2. 2017 1st round pick (TOR)
    Additional Details:
    18th OA
    TOR
    1. 2017 4th round pick (SJS)
    Additional Details:
    Tanev
    4.
    TBL
      Tanev
      CBJ 2nd (59th OA)
      5.
      VAN
      1. 2017 1st round pick (TBL)
      2. 2017 3rd round pick (TBL)
      Additional Details:
      14th OA
      67th OA
      TBL
        Tanev
        6.
        VAN
        1. Honka, Julius
        2. 2017 2nd round pick (OTT)
        Additional Details:
        51st-ish OA
        DAL
          Tanev
          Buyouts
          Retained Salary Transactions
          DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
          2017
          Logo of the VAN
          Logo of the BUF
          Logo of the TOR
          Logo of the TBL
          Logo of the VAN
          Logo of the OTT
          Logo of the VAN
          Logo of the TBL
          Logo of the VAN
          Logo of the VAN
          2018
          Logo of the VAN
          Logo of the VAN
          Logo of the VAN
          Logo of the VAN
          Logo of the VAN
          Logo of the VAN
          Logo of the VAN
          2019
          Logo of the VAN
          Logo of the VAN
          Logo of the VAN
          Logo of the VAN
          Logo of the VAN
          Logo of the VAN
          Logo of the VAN
          ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
          30$73,000,000$66,456,583$315,000$6,462,500$6,543,417
          Left WingCentreRight Wing
          $7,000,000$7,000,000
          LW
          NMC
          UFA - 2
          $7,000,000$7,000,000
          C
          NMC
          UFA - 2
          $6,000,000$6,000,000
          LW, RW
          NMC
          UFA - 6
          $1,850,000$1,850,000
          LW
          UFA - 2
          $4,375,000$4,375,000
          RW, C
          NTC
          UFA - 5
          $2,650,000$2,650,000
          RW
          UFA - 3
          $715,000$715,000
          LW
          UFA - 1
          $925,000$925,000
          C
          UFA - 2
          $950,000$950,000
          RW
          UFA - 1
          $900,000$900,000
          RW, LW, C
          UFA - 2
          $925,000$925,000
          RW
          UFA - 3
          $894,167$894,167 (Performance Bonus$2,300,000$2M)
          LW, RW
          UFA - 1
          $894,167$894,167 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
          C
          UFA - 1
          $700,000$700,000
          RW
          UFA - 1
          $863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$162,500$162K)
          LW, C
          UFA - 1
          $863,333$863,333
          RW
          UFA - 3
          $724,500$724,500
          C
          UFA - 1
          $600,000$600,000
          C, LW, RW
          UFA - 1
          $600,000$600,000
          C
          UFA - 1
          $600,000$600,000
          C
          UFA - 1
          $894,167$894,167 (Performance Bonus$2,650,000$3M)
          RW
          UFA - 2
          Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
          $5,000,000$5,000,000
          LD
          NTC
          UFA - 3
          $6,000,000$6,000,000
          G
          M-NTC
          UFA - 1
          $3,600,000$3,600,000
          LD
          UFA - 2
          $3,500,000$3,500,000
          RD
          UFA - 1
          $1,550,000$1,550,000
          G
          UFA - 1
          $896,250$896,250
          LD
          UFA - 1
          $925,000$925,000
          RD
          UFA - 2
          $863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$500,000$500K)
          RD
          UFA - 3
          $750,000$750,000
          RD
          UFA - 2

          Embed Code

          • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
          • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

          Text-Embed

          Click to Highlight
          May 10, 2017 at 2:06 p.m.
          #1
          Avatar of the user
          Joined: Feb. 2017
          Posts: 58
          Likes: 16
          you definitely over value him when there are plenty of available defenseman due to the expansion draft. He is good but not worth a top 6 guy just yet.
          May 10, 2017 at 2:15 p.m.
          #2
          Avatar of the user
          Joined: May 2016
          Posts: 11,517
          Likes: 4,566
          None of these are realistic. The Vancouver fanbase has taken overvaluing a player to a whole new level. I'd be willing to give up a 2nd at most for him.
          May 10, 2017 at 2:50 p.m.
          #3
          VeryLeafy
          Avatar of the user
          Joined: Aug. 2016
          Posts: 678
          Likes: 28
          Too much for tanev. I think both tanev and harmonic lost a lot of value by not being moved last year. One year older one year closer to ufa and both had weak years. I think both defensemen are defensive #4D men and complimentary to who ever they play with. It's hard to see tanev getting more then a decent prospect (not a top) and a late first (not mid/early) or second and a salaried (even money) depth roster player. Unless there is a bidding war of course which is possible as RHD are valuable and teams need them. Gms make dumb trades all the time but I believe what I'm suggesting to be fair.
          May 10, 2017 at 3:39 p.m.
          #4
          NateElder12
          Avatar of the user
          Joined: Apr. 2016
          Posts: 5,736
          Likes: 801
          Tanev doesn't even start conversations for Drouin. I think he's being overvalued a bit
          May 10, 2017 at 4:11 p.m.
          #5
          Avatar of the user
          Joined: Nov. 2015
          Posts: 1,565
          Likes: 89
          Leafs would be willing to offer Brendan Leipsic/Kerby Rychel (both solid B/B+ prospects) Connor Carrick (whose 4 years younger) and maybe a late first if we acquire one or a second

          Tanev is good but unsexy and wouldn't generate many chances, his shot suppressing is fantastic but that's not exactly marketable
           
          Reply
          To create a post please Login or Register
          Question:
          Options:
          Add Option
          Submit Poll