SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

The big moves

Created by: TheRealisticGuy
Team: 2022-23 New York Islanders
Initial Creation Date: Aug. 16, 2022
Published: Aug. 16, 2022
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
Signing Doah Dobson long terms here should be a priority
Bridging Romanov (comparable contract : Erik Cernak)
Use to pick acquire in the Varlamov trade to trade Bailey and Panik out to make room for Nazem Kadri (I hate that signing if it happens)
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
8$7,500,000
3$2,950,000
1$1,150,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
7$7,000,000
Trades
1.
NYI
  1. Brossoit, Laurent
  2. 2023 3rd round pick (BUF)
  3. 2024 2nd round pick (VGK)
2.
NYI
  1. 2024 7th round pick (BOS)
ARI
  1. Bailey, Josh
  2. Pánik, Richard
  3. 2023 3rd round pick (BUF)
  4. 2024 2nd round pick (VGK)
Buyouts
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2023
Logo of the NYI
Logo of the NYI
Logo of the NYI
Logo of the NYI
Logo of the NYI
Logo of the NYI
Logo of the NYI
2024
Logo of the NYI
Logo of the NYI
Logo of the NYI
Logo of the NYI
Logo of the NYI
Logo of the NYI
Logo of the NYI
Logo of the BOS
2025
Logo of the NYI
Logo of the NYI
Logo of the NYI
Logo of the NYI
Logo of the NYI
Logo of the NYI
Logo of the NYI
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$82,500,000$82,452,463$245,796$1,287,500$47,537
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the New York Islanders
$7,000,000$7,000,000
LW
NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the New York Islanders
$7,000,000$7,000,000
C, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the New York Islanders
$894,167$894,167 (Performance Bonus$537,500$538K)
RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the New York Islanders
$6,000,000$6,000,000
C, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 3
$7,000,000$7,000,000
C
UFA - 7
Logo of the New York Islanders
$4,150,000$4,150,000
RW, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the New York Islanders
$1,150,000$1,150,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the New York Islanders
$5,000,000$5,000,000
RW, LW
NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the New York Islanders
$750,000$750,000 (Performance Bonus$750,000$750K)
LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the New York Islanders
$5,000,000$5,000,000
C
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the New York Islanders
$1,750,000$1,750,000
RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the New York Islanders
$2,500,000$2,500,000
C
UFA - 5
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the New York Islanders
$5,750,000$5,750,000
LD
NTC
UFA - 7
Logo of the New York Islanders
$6,150,000$6,150,000
RD
NTC
UFA - 8
Logo of the New York Islanders
$4,000,000$4,000,000
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the New York Islanders
$2,950,000$2,950,000
LD
RFA - 3
Logo of the New York Islanders
$7,500,000$7,500,000
RD
RFA - 3
Logo of the New York Islanders
$825,000$825,000
LD
UFA - 2
Logo of the New York Islanders
$1,450,000$1,450,000
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vegas Golden Knights
$2,325,000$2,325,000
G
UFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the New York Islanders
$1,500,000$1,500,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the New York Islanders
$800,000$800,000
LD
UFA - 2
Logo of the New York Islanders
$762,500$762,500
LW, C
UFA - 2

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Aug. 16, 2022 at 11:14 a.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2022
Posts: 1,978
Likes: 683
Too much for Romanov he’s never been more than a decent third pairing yet I think 2.25 x 3 or even 2.5 x 3 would be better and I really hope that Kadri deal doesn’t go through
Aug. 16, 2022 at 11:49 a.m.
#2
Thread Starter
Habs4Ever
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2022
Posts: 4,297
Likes: 1,737
Quoting: Hockeypal
Too much for Romanov he’s never been more than a decent third pairing yet I think 2.25 x 3 or even 2.5 x 3 would be better and I really hope that Kadri deal doesn’t go through


Romanov was MTL #1 dman playing more minutes than Petry ... and did well there
He is already a top 4 dman, that's why NY paid that price, because he is an establish top 4 dman
Romanov will get between 2M and 3M, the year on the terms will determine the money
But he's no 3rd pairing dman, only on a contender with a solid defense he would be 3rd pairing
Aug. 16, 2022 at 12:29 p.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2022
Posts: 1,978
Likes: 683
Quoting: TheRealisticGuy
Romanov was MTL #1 dman playing more minutes than Petry ... and did well there
He is already a top 4 dman, that's why NY paid that price, because he is an establish top 4 dman
Romanov will get between 2M and 3M, the year on the terms will determine the money
But he's no 3rd pairing dman, only on a contender with a solid defense he would be 3rd pairing


Analytically he was never really anything more than a third pairing defenceman sure he was playing #1 minutes but he was never ever even close to being a top line d man he was maybe a low end 4th defenceman with St Louis
Aug. 16, 2022 at 12:35 p.m.
#4
Thread Starter
Habs4Ever
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2022
Posts: 4,297
Likes: 1,737
Quoting: Hockeypal
Analytically he was never really anything more than a third pairing defenceman sure he was playing #1 minutes but he was never ever even close to being a top line d man he was maybe a low end 4th defenceman with St Louis


Analytically Ben Chiarot brought a 1st + 4th + former 3rd RD pick prospect ... Romanov is a 22 yo top 4 LHD, he played like one and Chiarot is a top 4 dman as well, it's been what 5 years he's playing top 4 minutes and he will continu in DET. Maybe he's not the best, but he can handle minutes and if you can handle top 4 minutes, you are a top 4 dman
Aug. 16, 2022 at 12:43 p.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2022
Posts: 1,978
Likes: 683
Quoting: TheRealisticGuy
Analytically Ben Chiarot brought a 1st + 4th + former 3rd RD pick prospect ... Romanov is a 22 yo top 4 LHD, he played like one and Chiarot is a top 4 dman as well, it's been what 5 years he's playing top 4 minutes and he will continu in DET. Maybe he's not the best, but he can handle minutes and if you can handle top 4 minutes, you are a top 4 dman


It doesn’t matter what he got at the deadline he doesn’t play like a top 4 d man look at his time with Florida he was their worst defenceman, Chiarot and Romanov aren’t top 4 have never been analytically, base stats and eye test. No that’s completely wrong because he plays top 4 minutes but doesn’t play good look at Seth Jones he plays top 10 minutes for d in the league but he’s not even a top 30 d man in the league ice time doesn’t = how good you are
Aug. 16, 2022 at 12:47 p.m.
#6
Thread Starter
Habs4Ever
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2022
Posts: 4,297
Likes: 1,737
Quoting: Hockeypal
It doesn’t matter what he got at the deadline he doesn’t play like a top 4 d man look at his time with Florida he was their worst defenceman, Chiarot and Romanov aren’t top 4 have never been analytically, base stats and eye test. No that’s completely wrong because he plays top 4 minutes but doesn’t play good look at Seth Jones he plays top 10 minutes for d in the league but he’s not even a top 30 d man in the league ice time doesn’t = how good you are


Jones is a top 4 dman overpaid, you say there arent playing like top 4 dman but they are. You never seen Romanov play because eye test he is a top4 dman but low end, he's just 22 yo. But handling 20+ min a night on a regular bases is really good. Now he will play with Noah Dobson and Isles fans will be happy. Nurse is another top 4 dman overpaid, but he is a top 4 dman.
Aug. 16, 2022 at 12:51 p.m.
#7
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2022
Posts: 1,978
Likes: 683
Quoting: TheRealisticGuy
Jones is a top 4 dman overpaid, you say there arent playing like top 4 dman but they are. You never seen Romanov play because eye test he is a top4 dman but low end, he's just 22 yo. But handling 20+ min a night on a regular bases is really good. Now he will play with Noah Dobson and Isles fans will be happy. Nurse is another top 4 dman overpaid, but he is a top 4 dman.


I still have hope for Romanov he’s young but as of now he hasn’t had been a top 4 defence impact wise for a whole season he played like a below average 4th d man under St Louis I also can’t blame Romanov too he was put in a position he wasn’t ready to play he will face worse competition plus will have a better d partner and could very well have a full top 4 defence season for the first time in his career
Aug. 16, 2022 at 1:11 p.m.
#8
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2020
Posts: 4,901
Likes: 1,406
Quoting: Hockeypal
Analytically he was never really anything more than a third pairing defenceman sure he was playing #1 minutes but he was never ever even close to being a top line d man he was maybe a low end 4th defenceman with St Louis


Romanov never played for STL????? Also thats straight up not true the analytics actually say he was a solid 2nd pair guy.
Aug. 16, 2022 at 1:18 p.m.
#9
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2022
Posts: 1,978
Likes: 683
Quoting: Islesforthecup
Romanov never played for STL????? Also thats straight up not true the analytics actually say he was a solid 2nd pair guy.


Martin St Louis LOL, and it’s actually very true his analytics only changed to a decent 4th d man under St Louis
Islesforthecup liked this.
Aug. 16, 2022 at 1:21 p.m.
#10
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2020
Posts: 4,901
Likes: 1,406
Quoting: Hockeypal
Martin St Louis LOL, and it’s actually very true his analytics only changed to a decent 4th d man under St Louis


Lmaoooooooo 🤣🤣🤣🤣
As for his analytics ill post them in a minute
Aug. 16, 2022 at 1:35 p.m.
#11
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2020
Posts: 4,901
Likes: 1,406
Quoting: Hockeypal
Martin St Louis LOL, and it’s actually very true his analytics only changed to a decent 4th d man under St Louis


Really?


Aug. 16, 2022 at 2:10 p.m.
#12
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2022
Posts: 1,978
Likes: 683
Quoting: Islesforthecup


That’s after he played with St Louis before he was like 50% and 32% not to mention that’s exactly what I was saying a decent 4th d man his micro stats also weren’t good

Aug. 16, 2022 at 2:26 p.m.
#13
Thread Starter
Habs4Ever
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2022
Posts: 4,297
Likes: 1,737
Quoting: Hockeypal
Martin St Louis LOL, and it’s actually very true his analytics only changed to a decent 4th d man under St Louis


Only Lehkonen was always good, everyone under Ducharme struggle because the guy can't coach a hockey team at all. Dvorak didnt looked like a guy worth a 1st + 2nd but under MSL he's been way better. Every players outside Poehling and Armia looked like completely new players (Poehling been decent on a limited role). Anyway, we all know Romanov will never be a #1 dman but he will probably anchor a 2nd pair for his career.
Aug. 16, 2022 at 3:07 p.m.
#14
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2021
Posts: 104
Likes: 7
Moving bailey and picks to make space for Kadri should be a fireable offense. Just all around stupid move Bailey is still good and has value ( I love Kardi just wrong time to invest in an aging vet that contract will not age well) Just bailey 2.0 situation in 3-4 years. Kicking the ball down the road except this is a snowball only getting larger.
Aug. 16, 2022 at 3:37 p.m.
#15
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2021
Posts: 15,032
Likes: 12,097
Quoting: Hockeypal
That’s after he played with St Louis before he was like 50% and 32% not to mention that’s exactly what I was saying a decent 4th d man his micro stats also weren’t good

Aug. 16, 2022 at 3:39 p.m.
#16
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2021
Posts: 15,032
Likes: 12,097
Quoting: Hockeypal
That’s after he played with St Louis before he was like 50% and 32% not to mention that’s exactly what I was saying a decent 4th d man his micro stats also weren’t good

Aug. 16, 2022 at 3:39 p.m.
#17
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2021
Posts: 15,032
Likes: 12,097
Quoting: Hockeypal
Martin St Louis LOL, and it’s actually very true his analytics only changed to a decent 4th d man under St Louis


The fact that Romanov responded well to good coaching is a positive thing - Caufield had one of the worst underlying numbers in the league under Ducharme. The microstats only tracked 15 games, it's a small sample size and good microstats don't always lead to positive underlying numbers (ex Nick Leddy).

Under STL he was a solid 2nd pair two way defenseman. His offensive metrics skyrocketed under STL

His xGF/60 went from 2.08 to 2.54 , GF/60 2.15 to 2.71, HDCF/60 10.48 TO 11.12 , rebounds created/60 .18 to .35.
Aug. 16, 2022 at 3:52 p.m.
#18
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2020
Posts: 4,901
Likes: 1,406
Quoting: Hockeypal
That’s after he played with St Louis before he was like 50% and 32% not to mention that’s exactly what I was saying a decent 4th d man his micro stats also weren’t good

Aug. 16, 2022 at 4:01 p.m.
#19
Thread Starter
Habs4Ever
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2022
Posts: 4,297
Likes: 1,737
Quoting: NYI_Nelson
Moving bailey and picks to make space for Kadri should be a fireable offense. Just all around stupid move Bailey is still good and has value ( I love Kardi just wrong time to invest in an aging vet that contract will not age well) Just bailey 2.0 situation in 3-4 years. Kicking the ball down the road except this is a snowball only getting larger.


It's useless talking about Kadri, no one will love his contract
For Bailey I doubt he has positive value but I wouldnt be shock if he cost less to move
Aug. 16, 2022 at 7:57 p.m.
#20
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2022
Posts: 1,978
Likes: 683
Quoting: NYI_Nelson
Moving bailey and picks to make space for Kadri should be a fireable offense. Just all around stupid move Bailey is still good and has value ( I love Kardi just wrong time to invest in an aging vet that contract will not age well) Just bailey 2.0 situation in 3-4 years. Kicking the ball down the road except this is a snowball only getting larger.

No you’re just wrong unless it’s a bad contract for Kadri, Bailey is the worst defensive player on the team and is the most one dimensional player on the team can’t do nothing but inzone playmaking can’t exit, can’t ain’t puck battles, can’t shoot etc he needs to be moved he is the odd man out and needs to go
Aug. 16, 2022 at 8:01 p.m.
#21
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2022
Posts: 1,978
Likes: 683
Quoting: Db1899
The fact that Romanov responded well to good coaching is a positive thing - Caufield had one of the worst underlying numbers in the league under Ducharme. The microstats only tracked 15 games, it's a small sample size and good microstats don't always lead to positive underlying numbers (ex Nick Leddy).

Under STL he was a solid 2nd pair two way defenseman. His offensive metrics skyrocketed under STL

His xGF/60 went from 2.08 to 2.54 , GF/60 2.15 to 2.71, HDCF/60 10.48 TO 11.12 , rebounds created/60 .18 to .35.

Those micro stats are under St Louis so to say his metrics imploded with St Louis is a drastic overstatement since the whole teams metrics boosted every single players boosted by quite a bit he was a decent 4th defenceman I do have hope for him though
Aug. 16, 2022 at 11:12 p.m.
#22
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2021
Posts: 15,032
Likes: 12,097
Quoting: Hockeypal
Those micro stats are under St Louis so to say his metrics imploded with St Louis is a drastic overstatement since the whole teams metrics boosted every single players boosted by quite a bit he was a decent 4th defenceman I do have hope for him though


Suzukis analytics took a hit under STL.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll