SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Jammin

Created by: Bruinadian67
Team: 2022-23 Boston Bruins
Initial Creation Date: Nov. 9, 2022
Published: Nov. 9, 2022
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Trades
1.
BOS
  1. 2023 2nd round pick (BOS)
ANA
  1. Smith, Craig
  2. 2023 7th round pick (LAK)
2.
BOS
    Picked up off waivers (any team)
    Buried
    DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
    2023
    Logo of the BOS
    Logo of the BOS
    Logo of the BOS
    Logo of the BOS
    Logo of the BOS
    Logo of the BOS
    Logo of the BOS
    2024
    Logo of the BOS
    Logo of the BOS
    Logo of the BOS
    Logo of the BOS
    Logo of the BOS
    2025
    Logo of the BOS
    Logo of the BOS
    Logo of the BOS
    Logo of the BOS
    Logo of the BOS
    Logo of the BOS
    Logo of the BOS
    ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
    23$82,500,000$80,862,917$0$4,650,000$1,637,083
    Left WingCentreRight Wing
    Logo of the Boston Bruins
    $6,125,000$6,125,000
    LW
    M-NTC
    UFA - 3
    Logo of the Boston Bruins
    $2,500,000$2,500,000 (Performance Bonus$2,500,000$2M)
    C
    NMC
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Boston Bruins
    $4,000,000$4,000,000
    RW, LW
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the Boston Bruins
    $6,000,000$6,000,000
    LW
    M-NTC, NMC
    UFA - 3
    Logo of the Boston Bruins
    $1,000,000$1,000,000 (Performance Bonus$2,000,000$2M)
    C
    NTC
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Boston Bruins
    $6,666,667$6,666,667
    RW
    M-NTC, NMC
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Boston Bruins
    $5,250,000$5,250,000
    C, RW
    M-NTC, NMC
    UFA - 4
    Logo of the Boston Bruins
    $883,750$883,750
    C
    RFA - 1
    Logo of the Boston Bruins
    $3,500,000$3,500,000
    C, LW
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Boston Bruins
    $3,800,000$3,800,000
    LW, C, RW
    M-NTC
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Boston Bruins
    $762,500$762,500
    RW, LW
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the Boston Bruins
    $1,050,000$1,050,000
    LW, RW
    UFA - 1
    Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
    Logo of the Boston Bruins
    $3,687,500$3,687,500
    LD
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the Boston Bruins
    $9,500,000$9,500,000
    RD
    UFA - 8
    Logo of the Boston Bruins
    $5,000,000$5,000,000
    G
    NMC
    UFA - 3
    Logo of the Boston Bruins
    $6,500,000$6,500,000
    LD
    NTC, NMC
    UFA - 8
    Logo of the Boston Bruins
    $4,100,000$4,100,000
    RD
    UFA - 5
    Logo of the Boston Bruins
    $750,000$750,000
    G
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Boston Bruins
    $1,137,500$1,137,500
    LD/RD
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the Boston Bruins
    $1,000,000$1,000,000
    RD
    UFA - 1
    ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
    Logo of the Boston Bruins
    $1,750,000$1,750,000
    LW, C
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Boston Bruins
    $3,000,000$3,000,000
    LD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the Boston Bruins
    $1,000,000$1,000,000
    RD
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Boston Bruins
    $925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$150,000$150K)
    G
    RFA - 1
    Logo of the Boston Bruins
    $750,000$750,000
    LD
    UFA - 1

    Embed Code

    • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
    • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

    Text-Embed

    Click to Highlight
    Nov. 9, 2022 at 11:20 p.m.
    #1
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Aug. 2022
    Posts: 5,519
    Likes: 1,528
    Why is arizona trading a second for craig smith?
    majormoose007 liked this.
    Nov. 10, 2022 at 2:49 a.m.
    #2
    Future Ducks legend
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jun. 2022
    Posts: 10,048
    Likes: 6,819
    Why is Anaheim trading a second for Craig Smith?
    Nov. 10, 2022 at 3:35 a.m.
    #3
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jan. 2017
    Posts: 19,861
    Likes: 8,867
    Edited Nov. 10, 2022 at 8:04 a.m.
    Arizona does not want Reilly. Would have taken him last time if they did.

    It will be Islanders or Sens if anyone claims him.
    Bruinadian67 liked this.
    Nov. 10, 2022 at 10:25 a.m.
    #4
    Zach Johnston
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: May 2021
    Posts: 124
    Likes: 27
    too much for smith, and marc mclaughlin wouldnt start over nosek
    Nov. 10, 2022 at 1:25 p.m.
    #5
    Thread Starter
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Dec. 2020
    Posts: 701
    Likes: 139
    Quoting: DefenseFirst
    Why is arizona trading a second for craig smith?

    They’re not.
    Nov. 10, 2022 at 1:26 p.m.
    #6
    Thread Starter
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Dec. 2020
    Posts: 701
    Likes: 139
    Quoting: GiggywithGibby
    Why is Anaheim trading a second for Craig Smith?

    In this scenario, because I (as an armchair GM) want them to.
    Nov. 10, 2022 at 1:29 p.m.
    #7
    Thread Starter
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Dec. 2020
    Posts: 701
    Likes: 139
    Quoting: zachjohnston
    too much for smith, and marc mclaughlin wouldnt start over nosek

    That’s too bad! Nosek is snake-bitten lately though good on face offs and PK. I think McLaughlin could vastly improve given Noseks ice time!
    Nov. 10, 2022 at 1:31 p.m.
    #8
    Thread Starter
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Dec. 2020
    Posts: 701
    Likes: 139
    Quoting: Gofnut999
    Arizona does not want Reilly. Would have taken him last time if they did.

    It will be Islanders or Sens if anyone claims him.

    That’s why I put ‘any team’ in brackets. I hope it’s the Islanders…he’d do well there!
    Nov. 10, 2022 at 1:49 p.m.
    #9
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jan. 2017
    Posts: 19,861
    Likes: 8,867
    Quoting: Bruinadian67
    That’s why I put ‘any team’ in brackets. I hope it’s the Islanders…he’d do well there!


    Be a real good pairing for Mayfield.

    Reilly for Bellows should have been a thing. 🤷🏻‍♂️
    Nov. 10, 2022 at 7:00 p.m.
    #10
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Aug. 2022
    Posts: 5,519
    Likes: 1,528
    Quoting: Bruinadian67
    They’re not.


    Okay, same question for anaheim.
    Nov. 11, 2022 at 4:25 p.m.
    #11
    Thread Starter
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Dec. 2020
    Posts: 701
    Likes: 139
    Quoting: DefenseFirst
    Okay, same question for anaheim.


    Okay, same answer I gave GiggywithGibby.
    Nov. 11, 2022 at 4:40 p.m.
    #12
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Aug. 2022
    Posts: 5,519
    Likes: 1,528
    Quoting: Bruinadian67
    Okay, same answer I gave GiggywithGibby.


    Okay, so you poorly thought out trade and countered with, “because I said so.” Gotcha.
    Nov. 18, 2022 at 12:16 p.m.
    #13
    Thread Starter
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Dec. 2020
    Posts: 701
    Likes: 139
    Quoting: DefenseFirst
    Okay, so you poorly thought out trade and countered with, “because I said so.” Gotcha.


    Pretty sure that what this forum is for. One mans 'poorly thought out trade' is another mans 'I'm only doing this for fun so lighten up'. If I actually expected any of this to happen, the fun would be gone!
    Thanks for your interest and comments. And sarcasm.
    Nov. 18, 2022 at 1:00 p.m.
    #14
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Aug. 2022
    Posts: 5,519
    Likes: 1,528
    Quoting: Bruinadian67
    Pretty sure that what this forum is for. One mans 'poorly thought out trade' is another mans 'I'm only doing this for fun so lighten up'. If I actually expected any of this to happen, the fun would be gone!
    Thanks for your interest and comments. And sarcasm.


    And this forum is for critiquing as well. Don’t get all bent of shape when you post a trade that just doesn’t make any sense, and people critique it. Maybe put something in the description next time.
    Nov. 18, 2022 at 4:59 p.m.
    #15
    Thread Starter
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Dec. 2020
    Posts: 701
    Likes: 139
    Quoting: DefenseFirst
    And this forum is for critiquing as well. Don’t get all bent of shape when you post a trade that just doesn’t make any sense, and people critique it. Maybe put something in the description next time.


    I understand that and I don't feel bent out of shape. Your critiquing had a level of sarcasm that I liked and thanked you for. As for it not making sense, that is your opinion (which you're entitled to) and is welcomed. You COULD have said something like 'Smith will NOT garner a 2nd round pick even with adding a 7th' and offer an alternative. Critiquing doesn't have to just be mean. It can also be constructive. Once again, thank you for your reply and suggestions.
     
    Reply
    To create a post please Login or Register
    Question:
    Options:
    Add Option
    Submit Poll