Oilers need a LD big time to play in the 3-4 spot.
We dont need the package you offered.
Maybe you can work out another deal.

That has got to be one of the worst trades I have ever seen; the leafs quickly and easily decline this trade as they are getting nothing close to the value they are sending.

Very obviously a no from NYR, Kakko and Laffy needs top line minutes.
We not trading a future Trouba in Schneider for rental 'Tarasenko' com'on man, stop joking

Every team passes.




Heh. So what you're saying is, you're new here.

As for "nothing close to value": reel it all in, man.

well Blues are moving a 29 year old D signed until the end of time and a pending ufa, for a guy who is on pace for 40 goals with another year on his contract and the leafs Top D prospect, and Leafs give up the better pick, value seems off to me also.

Ha! You say one more year until Willy hits UFA like it's a great thing. And the Leaf's top D prospect is tiny and no more than a B prospect. Plus, the Blues don't need Rielly (a 28 yo Dman signed for a million more until the end of time and currently on LTIR thanks to a knee injury without a firm return date) and do need Parayko.

better than a ufa, also if he is such a poor prospect why are you trading for him? i am not sure how Rielly got into this conversation. Leafs need a RD but this just is not the right fit.

1 - I didn;t say it wasn't better than a UFA. But only just.
2 - This is not my AGM. I have never once suggested or approved trading for Neimela. And I didn;t say he was a poor prospect. I said he's not a top prospect.
3 - My bad on Rielly, I was mixing this up with a different Leafs-Blues trade that included Rielly. Must have had two tabs open at once, and mixed them up.

*Extremely prolonged sigh as this has been stated 900000000 times already*

You're not getting schneider, its not that he's the alleged "Second coming of bobby orr" that canucks fans accuse us of thinking he is, it's the fact that he is trouba's replacement when we inevitably move on from him.