SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Next Year

Created by: Bruins1054_gmb
Team: 2023-24 Boston Bruins
Initial Creation Date: Feb. 20, 2023
Published: Feb. 20, 2023
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Free Agent Signings
RESERVE LISTYEARSCAP HIT
3$950,000
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
1$787,500
2$787,500
1$882,000
1$826,875
4$2,300,000
1$787,500
1$787,500
1$787,500
1$874,125
2$2,750,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
1$775,000
8$10,250,000
1$1,200,000
1$775,000
CREATEDYEARSCAP HIT
Overages, Bonus
1$4,650,000
Trades
BOS
  1. 2023 2nd round pick (WSH)
Buyouts
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2023
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the WSH
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the LAK
2024
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
2025
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$83,500,000$87,770,792$4,500,000$0-$4,270,792
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$6,125,000$6,125,000
LW
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$4,750,000$4,750,000
C, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$10,250,000$10,250,000
RW
UFA - 8
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$6,000,000$6,000,000
LW
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$5,250,000$5,250,000
C, RW
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$4,000,000$4,000,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$787,500$787,500
LW, RW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$2,300,000$2,300,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$863,333$863,333
RW
RFA - 3
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$762,500$762,500
RW, LW
UFA - 1
$1,200,000$1,200,000
C, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$874,125$874,125
C
RFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$787,500$787,500
LW, C
UFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$800,000$800,000
C, RW
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$1,137,500$1,137,500
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$9,500,000$9,500,000
RD
UFA - 7
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$5,000,000$5,000,000
G
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$6,500,000$6,500,000
LD
NTC, NMC
UFA - 7
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$4,100,000$4,100,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$3,000,000$3,000,000
LD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$775,000$775,000
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$2,750,000$2,750,000
G
RFA - 1
$775,000$775,000
RD
UFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Overages, Bonus
$4,650,000$4,650,000

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Feb. 20, 2023 at 6:10 p.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2022
Posts: 5,519
Likes: 1,528
The bonus overage maxes out at $4.5 I believe.

Expect far more for grzelcyk
Feb. 20, 2023 at 6:15 p.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2023
Posts: 822
Likes: 241
Quoting: DefenseFirst
The bonus overage maxes out at $4.5 I believe.

Expect far more for grzelcyk


Can definitely get more for Gryz, but WSH is a likely destination

Thats an optimistically low AAV for Pastrnak and Sway
Feb. 20, 2023 at 6:20 p.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2022
Posts: 5,519
Likes: 1,528
Quoting: princessTom
Can definitely get more for Gryz, but WSH is a likely destination

Thats an optimistically low AAV for Pastrnak and Sway


I actually think pasta will wind up at 10.5. I know they had mostly worked out the AAV around 10, but now he’s having a nuclear season
Feb. 20, 2023 at 6:26 p.m.
#4
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2020
Posts: 1,210
Likes: 465
Quoting: DefenseFirst
The bonus overage maxes out at $4.5 I believe.

Expect far more for grzelcyk


It's $4.65M because of Swayman's bonuses, as well. I hope they can get more for Grzelcyk. Just trying to be conservative.
Feb. 20, 2023 at 6:27 p.m.
#5
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2020
Posts: 1,210
Likes: 465
Quoting: princessTom
Can definitely get more for Gryz, but WSH is a likely destination

Thats an optimistically low AAV for Pastrnak and Sway


The Bruins have always signed their guys to below market value. No reason to think that won't continue with Pasta. Might be a little low for Swayman, but it's a bridge deal.
Feb. 20, 2023 at 6:36 p.m.
#6
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2022
Posts: 5,519
Likes: 1,528
Quoting: Bruins1054_gmb
It's $4.65M because of Swayman's bonuses, as well. I hope they can get more for Grzelcyk. Just trying to be conservative.

That’s really really conservative
Feb. 20, 2023 at 6:53 p.m.
#7
GM CRIME DAWG
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2019
Posts: 4,972
Likes: 2,702
If Pasta was going to take that $ he'd be inked already....
Feb. 20, 2023 at 8:32 p.m.
#8
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2023
Posts: 822
Likes: 241
Quoting: DefenseFirst
I actually think pasta will wind up at 10.5. I know they had mostly worked out the AAV around 10, but now he’s having a nuclear season


Man I hope ur right, these recent reports of pasta wanting 8 years x 11mill AAV (maybe even more) have me worried for what theyre gonna do down the middle going forward

He is having a phenomenal szn, but hes also a turnover machine which gets overlooked by his point production
Bruins1054_gmb liked this.
Feb. 20, 2023 at 11:43 p.m.
#9
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2020
Posts: 1,210
Likes: 465
Quoting: DefenseFirst
That’s really really conservative


Who do you think Matt Grzelcyk is?
Feb. 21, 2023 at 5:53 a.m.
#10
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2022
Posts: 5,519
Likes: 1,528
Quoting: Bruins1054_gmb
Who do you think Matt Grzelcyk is?


A top four defensemen on a good contract. Duh.
Feb. 21, 2023 at 8:37 a.m.
#11
Craig Laughlin Fan
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2019
Posts: 5,320
Likes: 5,746
I don't see Washington as a landing spot for Grzelcyk due to having Fehervary, Alexeyev, and possibly Gustafsson (supposedly he was willing to take a pay cut to stay) on the left side.
Feb. 21, 2023 at 11:51 a.m.
#12
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2020
Posts: 1,210
Likes: 465
Quoting: DefenseFirst
A top four defensemen on a good contract. Duh.


5'9 defensemen don't get traded for big returns.
Feb. 21, 2023 at 12:01 p.m.
#13
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2022
Posts: 5,519
Likes: 1,528
Quoting: Bruins1054_gmb
5'9 defensemen don't get traded for big returns.


Luckily most people in hockey aren’t dumb enough to just look at the height and judge a player. Plenty of short players have done really well in this league.
Feb. 21, 2023 at 1:46 p.m.
#14
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2020
Posts: 1,210
Likes: 465
Quoting: DefenseFirst
Luckily most people in hockey aren’t dumb enough to just look at the height and judge a player. Plenty of short players have done really well in this league.


Right. But that doesn't refute the fact that they rarely get traded for big returns.
Feb. 21, 2023 at 1:55 p.m.
#15
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2022
Posts: 5,519
Likes: 1,528
Quoting: Bruins1054_gmb
Right. But that doesn't refute the fact that they rarely get traded for big returns.


Top four d men rarely get traded.
Feb. 21, 2023 at 4:20 p.m.
#16
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2020
Posts: 1,210
Likes: 465
Quoting: DefenseFirst
Top four d men rarely get traded.


That's not true. Weegar, Lindholm, Petry, Marino. Just to name a few in the last year.
Feb. 21, 2023 at 4:43 p.m.
#17
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2022
Posts: 5,519
Likes: 1,528
Quoting: Bruins1054_gmb
That's not true. Weegar, Lindholm, Petry, Marino. Just to name a few in the last year.


I should have amended to say top four with term.

Petry sucked. He was a cap dump. Marino took a step after getting moved but wasn’t much of anything at the time of trade. Lindholm, and weegar of course were rentals.

I think we can all agree that Jared Spurgeon, Torey Krug, Quinn Hughes, and Ryan Ellis are all guys that have had a lot of value in the national hockey league at various times. They’re either grzelcyk size, or a whopping inch taller.

You can make any excuse you want, but Matt grzelcyk has been a very high end d man in the NHL for the last three years, and virtually every stat (even the fancy ones I don’t care about) will back that up.

Is this a felger issue?
Feb. 21, 2023 at 5:12 p.m.
#18
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2020
Posts: 1,210
Likes: 465
Quoting: DefenseFirst
I should have amended to say top four with term.

Petry sucked. He was a cap dump. Marino took a step after getting moved but wasn’t much of anything at the time of trade. Lindholm, and weegar of course were rentals.

I think we can all agree that Jared Spurgeon, Torey Krug, Quinn Hughes, and Ryan Ellis are all guys that have had a lot of value in the national hockey league at various times. They’re either grzelcyk size, or a whopping inch taller.

You can make any excuse you want, but Matt grzelcyk has been a very high end d man in the NHL for the last three years, and virtually every stat (even the fancy ones I don’t care about) will back that up.

Is this a felger issue?


Lmao Felger. No I don't listen to him much anymore. He's so whiny and pompous it's hard to take anything he has to say seriously. I like Grzelcyk; thought it was the right move keeping him over Krug. It just seems like he's the likely cap casualty in the off-season.
Feb. 21, 2023 at 5:59 p.m.
#19
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2022
Posts: 5,519
Likes: 1,528
Quoting: Bruins1054_gmb
Lmao Felger. No I don't listen to him much anymore. He's so whiny and pompous it's hard to take anything he has to say seriously. I like Grzelcyk; thought it was the right move keeping him over Krug. It just seems like he's the likely cap casualty in the off-season.


Why?
Feb. 21, 2023 at 6:13 p.m.
#20
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2020
Posts: 1,210
Likes: 465
Quoting: DefenseFirst
Why?


Simple. Math.
Feb. 21, 2023 at 6:19 p.m.
#21
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2022
Posts: 5,519
Likes: 1,528
Quoting: Bruins1054_gmb
Simple. Math.


That’s a cop out.

Mcavoy and lindholm are the odd men out. Simple. Math.

Do better than that. Why grzelcyk. On the surface it makes no sense. One of the best value contracts on the team
Feb. 21, 2023 at 6:50 p.m.
#22
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2020
Posts: 1,210
Likes: 465
Quoting: DefenseFirst
That’s a cop out.

Mcavoy and lindholm are the odd men out. Simple. Math.

Do better than that. Why grzelcyk. On the surface it makes no sense. One of the best value contracts on the team


Are you really comparing Grzelcyk' value to Lindholm and McAvoy? Lol.
Grzelcyk is a movable contract. Do I really need to break it down Barney Style for you?
Feb. 21, 2023 at 7:38 p.m.
#23
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2022
Posts: 5,519
Likes: 1,528
Quoting: Bruins1054_gmb
Are you really comparing Grzelcyk' value to Lindholm and McAvoy? Lol.
Grzelcyk is a movable contract. Do I really need to break it down Barney Style for you?


No I didn’t. Don’t take offense to this, but I was more just mocking the “math. Simple.” It doesn’t make any sense.

Why grzelcyk? Why not someone else?
Feb. 22, 2023 at 1:41 a.m.
#24
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2020
Posts: 1,210
Likes: 465
Quoting: DefenseFirst
No I didn’t. Don’t take offense to this, but I was more just mocking the “math. Simple.” It doesn’t make any sense.

Why grzelcyk? Why not someone else?


The Bruins don't have many movable contracts in the off-season. DeBrusk, Zacha, Grzelcyk. Most of the other guys have clauses that make them more difficult to move for assets and cap space (Ullmark, Coyle, Hall, Forbort). My post shows that the Bruins can do very little in the off-season and still have to move a contract to be cap-compliant. Moving a guy like Grzelcyk makes sense if they can clear the space and get value back in a trade
Feb. 22, 2023 at 7:39 a.m.
#25
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2022
Posts: 5,519
Likes: 1,528
Quoting: Bruins1054_gmb
The Bruins don't have many movable contracts in the off-season. DeBrusk, Zacha, Grzelcyk. Most of the other guys have clauses that make them more difficult to move for assets and cap space (Ullmark, Coyle, Hall, Forbort). My post shows that the Bruins can do very little in the off-season and still have to move a contract to be cap-compliant. Moving a guy like Grzelcyk makes sense if they can clear the space and get value back in a trade


See? We got a little explanation out of you. FYI, Swayman doesn’t have any performance bonuses this year according to puckpedia.

That said, I disagree.

First of, Zacha does have a 10 team NTC. I don’t really see how Forbort’s 3 team no-trade list makes it hard for him to move. Coyle is 8 teams. Hall is 10 teams.

So here are my questions to go against, “math, simple,” though that was pretty deep.
1. Why not try to eat into a bit of the cap overages in 22-23 if possible? Seems like it will max at $4.5, but that can be eaten into.
2. Why not forbort?
3. Why not hall? Seems like an ideal candidate.
4. Why not debrusk? He’ll need a big raise after next year.
5. Why not coyle. 8 team no trade doesn’t make it impossible.

We could go down this road for a while. Point is, its not, “simple, math.” It’s a long discussion about roster construction and player value.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll