So say the rangers go on a run and tarasenko or Kane are fantastic does the owner get in they way and demand they keep one of them?

Thank God no Kane.

There is no way to resign the kids AND anyone else Dolan only interferes with the Knicks he usually lets his hockey guys handle the Rangers. Laffy, Miller, and Chytll are more important than Tarasenko and Kane

Dolan is a wildcard for sure, but there is no way they can afford Tarasenko unless he is willing to take half his market value, and the chances Kane "goes on a run" are minimal from what I have seen of him. He looks, old, slow, tired and worn out and has no clue how to play defense or backcheck. Worst trade they could have made.

Zero chance. We are -3m next year without them. Plus they are damaged goods

I don't agree that there is no chance that Dolan makes a push to keep Kane if he makes an impact in the playoffs and would consider resigning. There is a culture in the NHL that minimizes how much owner involvement there is and how directly the actions of a franchise are motivated by the goals of ownership.