SalarySwishSalarySwish
Avatar

Onlyfairtrades1

Member Since
Feb. 1, 2023
Forum Posts
2522
Posts per Day
10.6
Forum: Armchair-GMYesterday at 5:16 p.m.
Forum: Armchair-GMSun. at 12:03 p.m.
Thread: New York Rangers
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Fran615</b></div><div>Like I said, no amount of justification works. But please, go on. It's typical on here. Why the hell would you want a player you disrespect and don't even need? Don't trade it then. Keep your average undersized 4th round goaltender who will never crack the NHL.
I guess we're good buddy right?

You couldn't care less for Xhekaj who can't even fight. I've got the perfect solution: don't trade for him. All is fine. Everyone is happy.
You dn't try to go get a garbage NHL defensemen who is a 5th D and the Habs don't get an average AHL gooaltender, Everyone keeps their garbage, Great. We agree.

Such an easy solution. I read your comment and it all makes sense: that trade is ridiculous right?
I agree.</div></div>

Did I post this trade, buddy? The answer is NO. And I wouldn't, because Garand will end up being a much better goalie than Xhekaj will ever be a defenseman. So YOU should be happy because you get to keep your AHL defender, right?
Forum: Armchair-GMSun. at 11:45 a.m.
Thread: New York Rangers
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Fran615</b></div><div>The Habs trade is absolutely horrendous for Montreal.
No sane Rangers GM would even consider calling Habs GM to offer him that deal, to risk being laughed at so hard as to muddy the relationship for years to come.

Habs already have a much taller goaltender that is dominating the AHL much more than lackluster Garand.
And to trade a very coveted young warrior on defense for that future ECHL player? Wow.

How in the world, without the most juvenile unchecked bias, can someone even try to justify that trade as being a "bad trade" forr New York????</div></div>

LOL. Think what you want but Xhekaj wouldn't even break the Rangers top 5 on LD and the only thing he is more than bad at is fighting. He is ALL YOURS.
Forum: Armchair-GMFri. at 4:43 p.m.
Forum: Armchair-GMWed. at 1:04 p.m.
Thread: Trade deadline
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>GhostGM92</b></div><div>Why? They are getting rid of that Goodrow contract and getting Perron who's on the last year of his deal, your giving up a second and Kakko but your also getting Jonatan Berggren. I think it's a good deal actually. Perron is better than Goodrow, Kakko is better than Berggren but by how much? Are you getting better or worse? You're probably getting better by a little bit or even staying the same but you get rid of a bad contract.</div></div>

Goodrow and Perron are different types of players and Goodrow fills needs the Rangers have that they cannot afford to lose, and Perron can't fill. Plus Perron is 35, so no thanks to him. Kakko isn't available for trade because he is their best RW and is on the verge of breaking out and he has also become a very good 200 foot player. This trade makes them a worse team now and going forward, so easy no thanks for the Rangers.