Gibson has already said no to Toronto

LOL @ that return for him along with the retention along with Franky V

Bertuzzi already turned down 4 x $6,000,000 from Detroit. He wants at least 7 x $6,500,000.

Too bad all Canadian teams are on John Gibsons no trade list. Honestly how many times do we need to mention that? And Pat Verbeek isn't retaining $2,000,000 on Gibson for that garbage offer anyways.

And Ryan McDonagh isn't leaving no tax Tennessee for high tax Ontario Canada either. McDonagh says hell no to Toronto.

3m is a lot of retention. The seconds are fine I think, but they are pretty far out to retain 3m for another 3 years and McD is still pretty useful to our team.

You expect us to give you a 3rd for a guy you got for free? Nope. Keep dreaming.

Anaheim declines. We wouldn't exchange Frankie Vatrano for any two of those players, all three of whom have a grand total of 41 games and 8 points between them and none of whom can be characterized as an A prospect, and the retention on Gibson alone is worth the first.

If Toronto weren't on Gibson's no-trade list, the minimum we would accept for him without retention is the Boston first and Matt Knies.

I'm sorry, but you're not getting Matt Knies for a goalie making over 6m who hasn't posted good numbers in like four years lol.

I didn't say that we would. I said that that's the only way we would trade him. Your inability to understand a simple declarative sentence in English makes me lol.

k great glad the gif didnt work this time.

Pens decline swiftly.

Knights don't want or need TJ Brodie. We have plenty enough good defense and that one is just about the least one we'd want, let alone give 2 x 2nds for that