Couturier is cooked FYI, Back injuries have ruined his career

The Flyers trade is hilarious and ur justification of it is even worse lol, they can’t hang up the phone quick enough on the Leafs

Philly passes, And Sean Couturier doesn't waive his NMC for Toronto.

Bertuzzi doesn't sign that lame offer, Especially when Detroit already offered him more and he rejected it.

And Rasmus Andersson isn't available, Nor does that lame offer get him.

It's not perfect but not bad either. I will call it original and interesting. Good start

No one knows how long Couturier's neck holds out. You'd like to think it is fine, but the guy directly above you thinks he is toast already. It's a risk/reward deal. You are simply not going to get full value for him however much you might remember his play when healthy.

Bro it isn’t even about Coots lol the Flyers aren’t trading for Marner. They will keep Coots, TK, and their 7OA.

They just don't quit eh?... 🤣

No they won’t quit til the off-season is over

After the draft and they don't get a top 10 pick for Marner then they'll stop... lol

No one knows or doesn't know what Couturier does or does not do in terms of his NMC. To say otherwise is to add doubt to the veracity of anything you say here.

Detroit offered what exactly? I'm looking and not seeing any dollar amount beyond speculation from the media all of which is around the number I have. Plus if you care to look, the cap space is there to up that offer.

With Andersson, it is already out there that the Flames want a more offensive style of play. Rielly is one of the more reliable puck movers in the league over the past six seasons. Even in what was seen to be a bad one this year, he still had .63 PPG. Andersson has been over .5 exactly twice in his career. There are different players but I do not think one is necessarily better than the other. And again, you do not know who is or is not available. Pretending you do, does nothing for you.

Don't take it so personally we're all getting Shat on in all these situations

It's just for fun

It's not Couturiers neck, he's had two major back injuries.

You do not think Daniel Briere, an undersized scoring forward in his career, has no appreciation for a guy like Marner, who not only does it offensively over a point a game but was also nominated for the Selke this season? I find that hard to believe Marner is the same age as Konency and averages approximately twice as many points per season and four years younger than Coulturier who has serious health concerns.

Thanks for not writing as if you had a hot line into every NHL Head Office and people who listened to you there.

It's all part of the spine. Bottom line, it is a serious health concern.

If you did any research instead of just making trades based off ur own clueless assumptions you would know the Flyers explicitly said they weren’t targeting any big names in the offseason and want to get younger + stack up on picks/prospects. Please explain to me how going after a big target and giving away the 7OA while trading away ur top trade chip that can get you back a good haul of assets is in line with what the Flyers themselves said they were going to do? Read any other Leafs team that has Marner going to the Flyers every other Flyers fan says the same thing

Dude Couturier has 2 major back injuries he's washed up and not waiving for Toronto.

And Detroit reportedly offered Bertuzzi 4 x $6,250,000 and he said no. He's not signing with Toronto he'll remain in the Eastern US.

And Rasmus Andersson isn't going anywhere, He'd be the very last Dman Calgary moves. Especially not for the lame garbage you're proposing.

You have done such little research that you don’t even know what his injury is lmao like it’s seriously this impressive to know this little and still talk like you know what’s going on

There's a big difference in the lower and upper spine. It's the lower back not the neck region.

I don’t even know why coots is in the conversation. The flyers don’t even do that trade for TK and the 7OA. They also don’t do coots and 7OA for marner. The flyers do no have a use for marner other than a flip. No use. At all. Idk why TML fans keep trying to trade him to Philly. If you wanna cook up some three way deal where the flyers flip marner… sure, I’ll listen. But marner has no interest on playing for a rebuild and the rebuilding teams have no use for a player like marner. He’s good, we get it. He will walk into ufa. He’s useless to us. Please stop. This thread is ridiculous.

They are not getting any older in this deal. They are actually getting younger and better. Both Marner and Konency are 26, Coulturier is 30 and has an iffy back that may work or may not. Yes, there is a top 10 pick in there. That's the cost of doing business when you get a player of Marner's caliber. Compare this package to the package that Tkachuk landed Calgary last season. How many people think Calgary made out like bandits on that one?

Until the beginning of July, Marner has nothing to say about where he is or is not traded right? I'm not certain that Marner, given the chance to be *the guy* and not *one of the guys* turns down a Flyers team that already has some pieces in place like a Hart, a Sandheim, a York, a Tippet, and a Frost once he hits free agnecy. Are there more bodies there yet to fly? I'd be moving on from Provorov because he needs a change of scenery and I'd be taking bids on Cam Atkinson because if you pay down half his ticket he has value. Keep in mind Hart, Frost, Tippet, they are only two years younger than Marner is, Sandheim is a year older. It's not like your core, guys you believe are your future, are all 21 year olds. They are not. If anything Marner is a better match age wise in this regard than Coulturier.

I suppose that's your medical degree over there on the desk? I mean really man, if the fact that I mislabelled a back injury a neck injury is your big criticism of this thing, you are deliberately missing the forest for the trees. It's standard practice in debate. Not sure how successful you will be rebutting the main points of an argument? Distract, distract, distract.

Not debating I got the location wrong here. Also not debating that both types of injury are serious along the career threatening axis. In that regard (and only *that* regard) they are the same which is what I meant in my previous comment.