i think you forgot to add flyers first this year

Schmaltz and Hayton will not be dealt.

Makes no sense for Philly, Marner is only under contract for 2 more years and Philly won't be contending anywhere near then.

Haha, you're kidding me, this trade is already bad, adding the 7th OA makes it horrific.

overpaid d for 8 more years, and 2 middle 6ers doesnt get you one of the best rw in the NHL

That’s a massive underpayment for Marner, but seriously - why do you think the flyers would do this? They are in the midst of tear down and 3 years from being competitive - how does it make sense to trade young players for superstar (who almost certainly would not re-sign) in his prime.

I see that this is your first effort. Welcome to CapFriendly. Sometimes, it's not too friendly.

Arizona plays their home games in a bandbox in front of 6,000 family and close friends. The impecunious Coyotes won't be retaining anything on anyone they trade for anyone up to Connor McDavid. Moreover, Schmaltz is a good but underheralded and underrated center whose return, even if Arizona were inclined to trade him, would approach the return Vancouver got for Bo Horvat, who was a UFA whereas Schmaltz has three seasons left on his contract. Iron Man Matt Murray is a cap dump, especially with his cap hit, and Barrett Hayton >> Nic Robertson, so that trade is heavily slanted against the Coyotes.

Marner is expensive above and beyond his cap hit because it usually takes two or three roster players from the other team to make the deal mathematically acceptable to both sides. Such is the case here. Marner plus the cap hits of the two players to replace Tippett and Sanheim plus the retention of $1.5 million means that this trade is $14.5 million cap in for Philly and $10.75 million cap out. That's bad enough, and probably enough to make the deal unacceptable to the Flyers, but as @flyersarephilly points out, Marner is under contract for only two more seasons while Laughton is under contract for three, Tippett is under team control for at least 5 and Sanheim is signed for eight -- 8!! -- more seasons, so that trade is exchanging a significant part of Philly's future for the immediate benefit of two seasons of Marner's excellence now, which doesn't make much sense for them since they're unlikely to be reaching the playoffs in either season.

The problem with any Marner trade is that he won't make a non-contending team a contender and a contending team probably doesn't or won't have the cap space to absorb his cap hit, so the only teams that are probably going to make intelligent destinations for him are cusp playoff teams like Pittsburgh or Nashville or Calgary. And each one of them has their own bag of rocks, in Elaine Stritch's immortal phrase.

you're being very generalized here with everyone here. Owen Tippett could very possibly be a cheap, young 35/40 goal scorer in the future, really turned it on at the end of the season last year. Scott Laughton has already been involved with trade rumors and a late first was already declined - he had his career high in points last year, and can play up and down the lineup in all situations, with a very minimal cap hit. Sanheim is still young and had a down year in a new system, very explainable, and in a few years his cap hit will not be as bad, may even turn out to be a plus down the road. He was our best dman just the year before so i definitely expect a bounce back.

No way the Flyers would accept this, especially in a rebuild giving up two of their younger players. Try again.

they shouldnt accept it because of the rebuild theya re in you are right about that, but value wise this isnt really close

"Owen Tippett could very possibly be a cheap, young 35/40 goal scorer in the future" Marner IS a 30 goal 90-100 point winger whos elite defensively and plays every single situation

I think it will be much closer after next year, which is another reason I wouldn't accept. Tippett and Sanheim will be fine, and Laughts is needed in the locker room. I don't think the value is that far off, but for his cap hit, his age, and what he's gonna command, he doesn't make any sense from a Flyers fan point. Regardless, the trade would be declined.

I like Laughton and want him on the leafs, but not for this

Flyers laugh and hang up