Why would Boston ever consider that?

not enough value for Linus, even if the Bruins are selling him high

Im going based on the previous few BOS/NJD ACGMs.

They would consider it for...cap space! Similar to how Vegas traded their Vezine-winning goalie for a whole bunch of nothing very recently

Tyce Thompson will never be Tage, def an AHLer at best

A Bruins fan posted an Ullmark trade earlier today that was Smith and a 2nd. This is only marginally less.

yeah thats pretty terrible lol the highest prospect I would go is Clarke + a pick for Ullmark

yeah and? the point is we're getting something for nothing because they have 4M in space lol

They will get better offers elsewhere... were most likely gonna be sticking with VV & PyraSchmid

- everyone, about Fleury.

There are lots of goalies out there this offseason.

Hellebuyck, Hart, Hill, Brossoit, Ullmark/Swayman, Gibson, Blackwood, Quick, Jarry, Andersson, Raanta, Nedjelkovic, Korpisalo, Stolarz, Murray, Vejlemlka

I understand that its a buyers market for a goalie but Akira has def earned the right to increase his sample size. Wouldnt be opposed to trading VV based on his playoff performance; we need a strong goalie overall not one who performs decent in the regular season.

Akira is waivers eligible lol I won't pass on someone like Ullmark for cheap jsut because Akria showed out big in a small sample.

You will be disappointed with what happens this offseason regarding our netminders then.

Uh, no, I won't. I don't mind running VV/Schmid next year. I'm saying if you can add /certainty/ for cheap, you shouldn't pass that up.

Fleury was also 36 and making $7 mill at the time. You get a younger goalie for another year on a better contract in this scenario. It's an ok comparison, but the Bruins should get more than that if he's traded

right, as they do in this ACGM.

Thompson isn't worth anything. Hardly a better offer

Neither was the prospect that Vegas got from Chicago haha

2nd and **** prospect > **** prospect

yea honestly in my head i had Fluery going for a 2nd, forgot they legit gave him away

Regardless I think the Bruins look for a better package than that, they have other options to free up cap

I mean sure but its also cheaper to not give up anything with the goalies we have?

right, so its just a question of "how much would you trade for more stability at the goaltending position"

I would trade a 2nd lol your milage may vary, though, and that's fine

I mean we traded for Vitek using a 2nd and 3d rounder and he wasnt even a proven talent, I understand Boston is trying to offload his contract but this screams 3 way trade where a team that isnt competitive retains salary.

Okay, sure.

Either way we have a lot to be excited about considering what mgmt has done in the past 24 hours let alone 5 years

Absolutely