Calgary isn't retaining anything 🤣🤣🤣

Calgary is rebuilding in this scenario

Replace Clarke with a good prospect. The Duchene trade is your closest comparable here

Yeah, Calgary would have to decline here. New Jersey should add a little

Again, it's not worth it for Ullmark. It would have to be the Bruins adding. The Duchene trade was also really, really bad for Ottawa

Ullmark just isn't worth that much. At that point it would be better to go for Hellebuyck. The Bruins should add if Calgary is unhappy with it, but this is two firsts and an NHL ready prospect

You think you're giving up too much for Ullmark? If I'm understanding correctly, you're just swapping 1sts with Boston (which is probably an upgrade, if anything) and giving up a 3rd round pick for Ullmark at 50% retained for the next two years, and you think that's too much? Is Graeme really *that* good of a prospect?

No, Boston's 1st is going to Calgary for Lindholm. It's a 1st, 3rd, and Clarke for Ullmark, which is a package that could conceivably return Hellebuyck.

You want Calgary to retain 2,5m for 2 years. That cost something. It works if there is no retention. Clarke isn’t a really good prospect. Calgary would be looking more for 2 first and a A prospect for Lindholm

Again, then the Bruins should add something. They're the ones getting Lindholm, and the Devils are already paying a lot for Ullmark here. If the Devils were to add any more they would be better off trying to get Hellebuyck.

I agree Boston would have to add more, they're getting the best player in the deal.

Panic TRADE ALERT. So Devils give up so much for Elias just to flip him HUH make no sense. Ullmark isnt gonna have a great season as he had last year, So its a risk im not willing to take. In the end no thanks keep Ullmark. Pro tip, instead of making a mess in trades in ACGM you should do it in the Trade machine instead of this terrible mess you made.

They aren’´t paying a lot lol. They are paying a first, a ok prospect and a third for the Vezina winning goaltender at 50% retention. That isn’t a lot. Clark should be change to Casey and Boston add a third to make the deal fair

Look I get it you don't want to trade for a goalie. I'm sorry if you're not following what's going on here but the Devils aren't paying for Lindholm

Casey is not on the table for Ullmark. Goalies don't get the kinds of returns people on this site think they will.

But Vezina winning goalies get more than a first, an ok prospect and a third… You want Ullmark, then you have to pay

What did vezina goalie fleury go for?

How many dollars more did he have on his contract? How much older was he?

The only goalie I can think of that got a return that big was Miller, and that trade is widely regarded as a huge mistake. Schneider got the 9th overall pick, but he was more consistently a top goalie than Ullmark.

Show me a comparable trade that gets a 1st, 3rd and prospect.

bruins decline. devils decline. flames fans wish they would get this much for any of their washed out "core"

Goalies are rarely traded so we don’t really know their value, but Boston won’t trade him for less than a good return. Brière is asking for 2 first for Hart, who is worse. What makes you think Ullmark gets less?

I don't think Hart gets 2 firsts. Teams don't want to give up a lot of assets for a position that's so unpredicatabl.

Hart surely won’t get less since Brière said he will not trade him. If you want him, you have to pay his price. Same thing with Ullmark. You want him, pay for him

These are completely incomparable scenarios. The Flyers are starting a rebuild, whereas the Bruins are at the end of their window and need cap space