Quoting: mv21227
If you actually watched the Canucks, you’d see Pettersson has been this skilled his whole career, he’s just been on a bad team. Year 3 he was injured and year 4 he played with the injury half the season. Post all star break in 21/22 he played at a 50 goal, 100 point pace. You know who else had their breakout season in year 5? MacKinnon. Were you calling that a fluke when it happened?
And for their careers
Pettersson: 323P in 325GP, 0.99 PPG
Aho: 468P in 520GP, 0.9 PPG
Pettersson has a higher PPG and better defensive metrics despite being on a far worse team. So yes Pettersson would be the Canes 1C. Saying Aho is better is homerism at its finest
Since Aho started playing center, his career PPG rate is 3 points under a PPG... Aho's still the better player.
I've watched enough of the Canucks to say that there's a difference between skill and production. Martin Necas is one of the most skilled players in the NHL. He's got a career high of 71 points.
Funny you mention EP's defensive metrics are better. They're not. Aho's are better according to Natural Stat Trick's player comparison with better xGA, better xGF, and better HDGA (high danger goals against) and that applied to medium danger and low danger goals against.
If EP40 does this again, that's one thing. But if he "regresses" to a PPG player... definitely not. Also, second half season point paces matter? Kotkaniemi was on a 60 point pace after Christmas, should I be expecting 60 points from him next year? If Kuzmenko's shooting percentage drops to even 15% (which is a decent way above league average of 12%) EP's going to lose what 20 assists?