SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Flames suck

Created by: JKCpp
Team: 2023-24 Calgary Flames
Initial Creation Date: Sep. 16, 2023
Published: Sep. 16, 2023
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Trades
1.
CGY
  1. Wennberg, Alexander
  2. 2024 1st round pick (SEA)
  3. 2024 3rd round pick (TOR)
2.
CGY
  1. Duchene, Matt
  2. Hakanpää, Jani
  3. Suter, Ryan
  4. 2024 1st round pick (DAL)
  5. 2025 5th round pick (NJD)
  6. 2026 2nd round pick (DAL)
DAL
  1. Hanifin, Noah
  2. Tanev, Christopher ($2,250,000 retained)
3.
BOS
  1. Backlund, Mikael ($2,350,000 retained)
Retained Salary Transactions
Buried
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2024
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the SEA
Logo of the DAL
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
2025
Logo of the FLA
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the NJD
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
2026
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the DAL
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
22$83,500,000$81,063,333$0$850,000$2,436,667
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$10,500,000$10,500,000
LW, RW
NMC
UFA - 8
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$7,000,000$7,000,000
C
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$5,800,000$5,800,000
RW, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$3,100,000$3,100,000
C, LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Seattle Kraken
$2,250,000$2,250,000
C
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Dallas Stars
$3,000,000$3,000,000
RW, C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$863,333$863,333
LW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$2,000,000$2,000,000
C, RW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$4,900,000$4,900,000
RW, LW
NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$762,500$762,500
LW, C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$2,300,000$2,300,000
LW, RW, C
RFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
RW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$825,000$825,000
RW
UFA - 2
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$6,250,000$6,250,000
LD/RD
NTC
UFA - 8
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$4,550,000$4,550,000
RD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$6,000,000$6,000,000
G
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Dallas Stars
$3,650,000$3,650,000
LD
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Dallas Stars
$1,500,000$1,500,000
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$2,200,000$2,200,000
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$925,000$925,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$3,750,000$3,750,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$762,500$762,500
LD
UFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$2,500,000$2,500,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Sep. 16, 2023 at 8:16 a.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 38,561
Likes: 19,696
Nice troll post
SlevinKalevra liked this.
Sep. 16, 2023 at 9:32 a.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 5,286
Likes: 2,731
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
Nice troll post


People really need to stick to their own teams on this site lol
Sep. 16, 2023 at 10:58 a.m.
#3
Thread Starter
Hank
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2023
Posts: 1,435
Likes: 368
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
Nice troll post


So offended yet the team didn’t get much worse and is loaded on picks but whatever man idk how you think this is a troll post
Sep. 16, 2023 at 11:03 a.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 38,561
Likes: 19,696
Quoting: JKCpp
So offended yet the team didn’t get much worse and is loaded on picks but whatever man idk how you think this is a troll post


1st trade is an awful return.
2nd trade is meh but involves a player with a full NMC
3rd trade is awful, Geekie was literally not qualified less than 2 months ago.

Im not offended im just calling it as it is
Sep. 16, 2023 at 11:36 a.m.
#5
Thread Starter
Hank
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2023
Posts: 1,435
Likes: 368
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
1st trade is an awful return.
2nd trade is meh but involves a player with a full NMC
3rd trade is awful, Geekie was literally not qualified less than 2 months ago.

Im not offended im just calling it as it is


U are offended and u aren’t saying it how it is at all cause u think I’m trolling
Sep. 16, 2023 at 11:47 a.m.
#6
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 19,847
Likes: 8,858
Thanks, but no thanks.
Sep. 16, 2023 at 11:58 a.m.
#7
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 38,561
Likes: 19,696
Quoting: JKCpp
U are offended and u aren’t saying it how it is at all cause u think I’m trolling


Your post indicates that you think Lindholm is worth noticeably less than Horvat and Backlund at 50% retention has a net value of free. What am I missing here?
Sep. 16, 2023 at 12:17 p.m.
#8
Thread Starter
Hank
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2023
Posts: 1,435
Likes: 368
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
Your post indicates that you think Lindholm is worth noticeably less than Horvat and Backlund at 50% retention has a net value of free. What am I missing here?

What are u talking about? Lindholm is returning a first and a third also a pretty decent player if anything this is pretty similar to the horvat trade
Sep. 16, 2023 at 12:39 p.m.
#9
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 38,561
Likes: 19,696
Quoting: JKCpp
What are u talking about? Lindholm is returning a first and a third also a pretty decent player if anything this is pretty similar to the horvat trade


Horvat returned a 1st that was ~11th OA at the time of trade, a top 40-70 prospect, and a solid under 26 roster player. Your trade has him getting a likely mid/late 1st, a mid round pick, and a 29 year old depth player. You can't possibly consider that similar. Not to mention Lindholm is a much better player than Horvat.
Sep. 16, 2023 at 1:58 p.m.
#10
Thread Starter
Hank
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2023
Posts: 1,435
Likes: 368
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
Horvat returned a 1st that was ~11th OA at the time of trade, a top 40-70 prospect, and a solid under 26 roster player. Your trade has him getting a likely mid/late 1st, a mid round pick, and a 29 year old depth player. You can't possibly consider that similar. Not to mention Lindholm is a much better player than Horvat.


Horvat was better than lindholm last year though and held more value
Sep. 16, 2023 at 1:59 p.m.
#11
Thread Starter
Hank
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2023
Posts: 1,435
Likes: 368
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
Horvat returned a 1st that was ~11th OA at the time of trade, a top 40-70 prospect, and a solid under 26 roster player. Your trade has him getting a likely mid/late 1st, a mid round pick, and a 29 year old depth player. You can't possibly consider that similar. Not to mention Lindholm is a much better player than Horvat.


But either way man I wasn’t trying to troll this was done with good intentions so relax
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll