Edited Nov. 12, 2023 at 3:35 p.m.
Quoting: Leafsfan98
Vancouver was an inferior team though... It was obvious last night as TO had all the chances minus playing on the PK 6 times to 2... And look at VAN's schedule, they faced the struggling Oilers 3 times, the Sharks once, the Sens once, the Blues once and the Preds twice out of their 10 wins and they lost to the Flyers... That's 8/10 wins that they should have had no matter what, minus injuries... You might counter with: "Well the Leafs lost to the Preds and Sens" but both games were bad on the Leafs end with no depth on the back end... That's why reinforcing the depth would be huge...
In general Leafs were the team on the second half of a b2b if anything they should not have been outplaying Van that badly lul. A team who coming in top in the NHL in scoring
But the fact they got better in the second game should be used as a motivator for the team and allow for a jumpstart in momentum.
McCabe coming back has been nice but more is needed still on the defensive end
As their PK still needs some work even though it was 6/8 in 2 games and they still need a 2nd pair RD. Net front is also needed but it all depends on assets. Cause RD should be priority rn. Go spend on that. LD to allow Gio to rest is secondary (if that new guy can also be a strong net front defender also would help)
While sample size is small I think the callups have fixed the bottom 6
McMann and Robertson have done a nice job and the bottom 6 for the first time felt useable. Now its not to say Reaves doesnt also have a use but that use is so specialized. Like we saw when other team had an enforcer it works when they dont have 0 point
But yea Leafs matched Van than smacked them and not allowing 4 goals at home nice touch. So its not Van is inferior but Leafs matched them pretty well than overcame them. Now will they keep it up lets see