SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Allvin Free Agency

Created by: Prime_Jimbo
Team: 2024-25 Vancouver Canucks
Initial Creation Date: Dec. 22, 2023
Published: Dec. 22, 2023
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
8$11,500,000
8$7,500,000
2$1,100,000
2$950,000
2$800,000
2$787,500
2$787,500
1$775,000
1$775,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
4$4,250,000
3$1,950,000
1$1,900,000
4$4,250,000
1$5,250,000
Trades
VAN
  1. 2024 3rd round pick (STL)
STL
  1. Garland, Conor
Additional Details:
Draft deal
Buyouts
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2024
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the STL
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the NJD
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the VAN
2025
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
2026
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
22$87,700,000$87,696,667$0$0$3,333
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$4,750,000$4,750,000
LW, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$11,500,000$11,500,000
C, LW
UFA - 8
$5,250,000$5,250,000
RW
UFA
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$1,100,000$1,100,000
LW, RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$8,000,000$8,000,000
C, LW, RW
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$6,650,000$6,650,000
RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$5,500,000$5,500,000
LW, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$1,600,000$1,600,000
C, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$1,950,000$1,950,000
RW, C, LW
UFA
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$1,100,000$1,100,000
RW, LW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$825,000$825,000
C
RFA - 2
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$787,500$787,500
RW
RFA
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$7,850,000$7,850,000
LD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$7,500,000$7,500,000
RD
RFA
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$5,000,000$5,000,000
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$4,250,000$4,250,000
LD/RD
UFA
$4,250,000$4,250,000
RD
UFA
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$1,900,000$1,900,000
G
UFA
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$3,250,000$3,250,000
LD/RD
NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$787,500$787,500
RD
RFA
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$775,000$775,000
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$2,500,000$2,500,000
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$775,000$775,000
LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$775,000$775,000
LD
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Dec. 22, 2023 at 6:06 p.m.
#1
mokumboi
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2019
Posts: 29,330
Likes: 11,374
I kinda doubt the Blues go for that, at least until they've switched out at least one of their top 5 LDs.

However, I would probably say yes myself if you agreed to add Woo for a 4th into the trade.
Dec. 22, 2023 at 6:55 p.m.
#2
Good Opinion Haver
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 1,837
Likes: 939
Garland's really good but it's one of those moves that keeps the Blues in the middle. He's going to help them too much to be bad and get high draft picks but he's not good enough to meaningfully transform their roster into one that does much of anything (mostly because he doesn't address the part of the roster that's really holding them back) so they just get to be a team that picks 10-20 in perpetuity. Targeting Garland (a good value add for a third round pick IMO) only makes sense if they do other stuff to get back to contention, and that seems unlikely (especially by the draft).

Quoting: mokumboi
I kinda doubt the Blues go for that, at least until they've switched out at least one of their top 5 LDs.

However, I would probably say yes myself if you agreed to add Woo for a 4th into the trade.


Woo lost his waiver eligibility this year, could have been had for nothing and no one claimed him. 4th round pick is basically nothing but it's not actually nothing.
Dec. 22, 2023 at 7:03 p.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2021
Posts: 996
Likes: 262
Quoting: mokumboi
I kinda doubt the Blues go for that, at least until they've switched out at least one of their top 5 LDs.

However, I would probably say yes myself if you agreed to add Woo for a 4th into the trade.


Garland drives the Canucks third line which has been the most consistent line. Highly doubt Garland goes anywhere.
remowilliams liked this.
Dec. 22, 2023 at 8:16 p.m.
#4
Ktownchef
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2022
Posts: 415
Likes: 172
Couple of things. Hronek is going to take 8+. Way too much money for Zadorov and DeMelo. Too much term for Laffy with guys like Podz, Bains, Lekkerimaki, Raty, etc that can fill bottom lineup roles. Hopefully Lekkerimaki can be more then that.

Just a quick question. If you take away Tarasenko and DeMelo you'd have enough cap space for a game changer like Guentzel or Reinhart who I would way rather have then those two. Just a thought.
Dec. 22, 2023 at 8:26 p.m.
#5
mokumboi
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2019
Posts: 29,330
Likes: 11,374
Quoting: Dickie_Dunn
Garland drives the Canucks third line which has been the most consistent line. Highly doubt Garland goes anywhere.


It's not my trade, dude.
Dec. 22, 2023 at 8:33 p.m.
#6
mokumboi
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2019
Posts: 29,330
Likes: 11,374
Quoting: TheEarthmaster
Garland's really good but it's one of those moves that keeps the Blues in the middle. He's going to help them too much to be bad and get high draft picks but he's not good enough to meaningfully transform their roster into one that does much of anything (mostly because he doesn't address the part of the roster that's really holding them back) so they just get to be a team that picks 10-20 in perpetuity. Targeting Garland (a good value add for a third round pick IMO) only makes sense if they do other stuff to get back to contention, and that seems unlikely (especially by the draft).



Woo lost his waiver eligibility this year, could have been had for nothing and no one claimed him. 4th round pick is basically nothing but it's not actually nothing.


Woo cleared waivers, so he can't just be claimed now. When he was on waivers, we still had nine Dmen on the roster. He's absolutely worth a 4th to me.

As for Garland, thus doom scenario is rather dramtic. And I did say only if we had already an LD slot rectified.
Dec. 22, 2023 at 8:45 p.m.
#7
Thread Starter
VAN
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2022
Posts: 6,182
Likes: 1,883
Quoting: Ktownchef
Couple of things. Hronek is going to take 8+. Way too much money for Zadorov and DeMelo. Too much term for Laffy with guys like Podz, Bains, Lekkerimaki, Raty, etc that can fill bottom lineup roles. Hopefully Lekkerimaki can be more then that.

Just a quick question. If you take away Tarasenko and DeMelo you'd have enough cap space for a game changer like Guentzel or Reinhart who I would way rather have then those two. Just a thought.


$8+ for Hronek is too much. He's been really good but Hughes effect is real.

Z is the future top 4 LHD. Don't think it's too much money. He won't get less than what he makes now.

If Bains becomes a 4th liner, that would be a plus. He won't be more than that.

Lekkerimaki is a couple years away still. So Tank on a short deal makes sense vs spending crazy money and term on others like Reinhart. Rather keep the flexibility with Kuz and Boeser in contract years as well.

DeMelo is worth that. He's underrated and he's in a premium position on the right. I'd rather two good players than get roped into a long term deal and overpay Reinhart or someone like that.
Dec. 22, 2023 at 9:23 p.m.
#8
Ktownchef
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2022
Posts: 415
Likes: 172
Quoting: Prime_Jimbo
$8+ for Hronek is too much. He's been really good but Hughes effect is real.

Z is the future top 4 LHD. Don't think it's too much money. He won't get less than what he makes now.

If Bains becomes a 4th liner, that would be a plus. He won't be more than that.

Lekkerimaki is a couple years away still. So Tank on a short deal makes sense vs spending crazy money and term on others like Reinhart. Rather keep the flexibility with Kuz and Boeser in contract years as well.

DeMelo is worth that. He's underrated and he's in a premium position on the right. I'd rather two good players than get roped into a long term deal and overpay Reinhart or someone like that.


8+ for Hronek may be too much but it doesn't mean he's not going to get it. He's on pace for over 70 points. 25 year old 70 point RHD aren't cheap.

Zadorov is not a top 4 guy I'm sorry he's just not the same goes with DeMelo. We just disagree there. 8.5 million is crazy money for two bottom pairing defensemen.
Dec. 22, 2023 at 9:32 p.m.
#9
Thread Starter
VAN
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2022
Posts: 6,182
Likes: 1,883
Quoting: Ktownchef
8+ for Hronek may be too much but it doesn't mean he's not going to get it. He's on pace for over 70 points. 25 year old 70 point RHD aren't cheap.

Zadorov is not a top 4 guy I'm sorry he's just not the same goes with DeMelo. We just disagree there. 8.5 million is crazy money for two bottom pairing defensemen.


He's doing great off Morrissey. Consistent, defensive guy. He's better than all the D not Hughes or Hronek in Van.
Dec. 23, 2023 at 2:01 a.m.
#10
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2021
Posts: 996
Likes: 262
Quoting: mokumboi
It's not my trade, dude.


Relax, its not mine either.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll