SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Offseason

Created by: Canucks123
Team: 2024-25 Vancouver Canucks
Initial Creation Date: Jan. 3, 2024
Published: Jan. 3, 2024
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
8$11,250,000
8$6,625,000
2$775,000
2$775,000
2$775,000
2$775,000
2$775,000
2$775,000
2$775,000
2$925,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
6$4,125,000
3$1,750,000
3$1,000,000
3$2,000,000
2$1,750,000
1$1,000,000
Trades
VAN
  1. Weegar, MacKenzie
  2. 2024 2nd round pick (CGY)
CGY
  1. Garland, Conor
  2. Kravtsov, Vitali [Reserve List]
  3. Woo, Jett [RFA Rights]
  4. 2024 1st round pick (VAN)
Buyouts
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2024
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the NJD
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the VAN
2025
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
2026
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$87,700,000$85,871,667$0$0$1,828,333
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$1,100,000$1,100,000
LW, RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$8,000,000$8,000,000
C, LW, RW
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$6,650,000$6,650,000
RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$5,500,000$5,500,000
LW, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$11,250,000$11,250,000
C, LW
UFA - 8
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$4,750,000$4,750,000
LW, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$925,000$925,000
RW, LW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$1,600,000$1,600,000
C, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$1,750,000$1,750,000
RW, C, LW
UFA
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$1,000,000$1,000,000
LW
UFA
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$2,000,000$2,000,000
C, LW
UFA
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$775,000$775,000
RW
RFA
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$775,000$775,000
LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$825,000$825,000
C
RFA - 2
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$7,850,000$7,850,000
LD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$6,625,000$6,625,000
RD
RFA
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$5,000,000$5,000,000
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$4,125,000$4,125,000
LD/RD
UFA
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$6,250,000$6,250,000
LD/RD
NTC
UFA - 7
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$1,750,000$1,750,000
G
UFA
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$3,250,000$3,250,000
LD/RD
NTC
UFA - 2
$1,000,000$1,000,000
RD
UFA
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$775,000$775,000
RD
UFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$2,500,000$2,500,000
RD
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Jan. 3 at 6:49 a.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 38,549
Likes: 19,686
Pretty easy no for Calgary. It's a weak offer even if you remove the 2nd
Jan. 4 at 5:14 a.m.
#2
Thread Starter
BigMeech
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2022
Posts: 1,556
Likes: 349
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
Pretty easy no for Calgary. It's a weak offer even if you remove the 2nd


whats he worth
Jan. 4 at 5:30 a.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 38,549
Likes: 19,686
Quoting: Canucks123
whats he worth


Not at all available but it would probably start with Willander/Brtzustewics + Raty + 1st. Which I highly doubt Vancouver would be willing to pay
Jan. 4 at 6:03 a.m.
#4
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2021
Posts: 12,418
Likes: 2,630
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
Not at all available but it would probably start with Willander/Brtzustewics + Raty + 1st. Which I highly doubt Vancouver would be willing to pay


Raty plus a 1st would seem fair, but either of the other guys would be an overpay
Canucks123 liked this.
Jan. 4 at 6:33 a.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 38,549
Likes: 19,686
Quoting: Knuckl3s
Raty plus a 1st would seem fair, but either of the other guys would be an overpay


For 7 more years of him? He's not a rental lol. Go ask what Islanders fans would want for Pulock
Jan. 4 at 6:36 a.m.
#6
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2021
Posts: 12,418
Likes: 2,630
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
For 7 more years of him? He's not a rental lol. Go ask what Islanders fans would want for Pulock


He's not, but he's also got a ton of term left too. Pulock is different as his game is already showing signs of regression, where as Weegar isn't there yet
Jan. 4 at 7:00 a.m.
#7
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 38,549
Likes: 19,686
Quoting: Knuckl3s
He's not, but he's also got a ton of term left too. Pulock is different as his game is already showing signs of regression, where as Weegar isn't there yet


And that term brings his cost up, not down.

Pulock is literally on LTIR, not sure how you call that "signs of regression."

Lets get this straight. The price to acquire Weegar, especially to a division rival will cost more far more than you are going to be willing to pay. You are far better off targeting Pesce or Roy in the offseason
Jan. 4 at 9:13 p.m.
#8
Thread Starter
BigMeech
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2022
Posts: 1,556
Likes: 349
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
Not at all available but it would probably start with Willander/Brtzustewics + Raty + 1st. Which I highly doubt Vancouver would be willing to pay


your outta ur rocker
Jan. 4 at 10:24 p.m.
#9
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 38,549
Likes: 19,686
Quoting: Canucks123
your outta ur rocker


In what way? Top 20 defensemen with term don't come cheap
Jan. 4 at 10:28 p.m.
#10
Thread Starter
BigMeech
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2022
Posts: 1,556
Likes: 349
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
In what way? Top 20 defensemen with term don't come cheap


yea on term till he's 37
Jan. 5 at 12:04 a.m.
#11
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 38,549
Likes: 19,686
Quoting: Canucks123
yea on term till he's 37


Ok good luck with the UFA market. Again he's not available to begin with
Jan. 6 at 5:55 a.m.
#12
Thread Starter
BigMeech
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2022
Posts: 1,556
Likes: 349
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
Ok good luck with the UFA market. Again he's not available to begin with


idk what flames are doing tbh
Huberdeau situation is a gong show
they might do a rebuild in summer or a retool
Who knows at the end of the day if he's available right now or later, we don't have the knowledge to know for certain if he's available or not to begin with
Jan. 6 at 6:45 a.m.
#13
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 38,549
Likes: 19,686
Quoting: Canucks123
idk what flames are doing tbh
Huberdeau situation is a gong show
they might do a rebuild in summer or a retool
Who knows at the end of the day if he's available right now or later, we don't have the knowledge to know for certain if he's available or not to begin with


Calgary has 2 NHL defensemen under contract for next season. He's a top 20 defenseman in the league, a top 5 defensive defenseman on top of that, and he is a great player for mentoring young guys. Regardless of the direction Calgary goes he's well worth keeping around
Jan. 17 at 4:18 p.m.
#14
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2021
Posts: 12,418
Likes: 2,630
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
And that term brings his cost up, not down.

Pulock is literally on LTIR, not sure how you call that "signs of regression."

Lets get this straight. The price to acquire Weegar, especially to a division rival will cost more far more than you are going to be willing to pay. You are far better off targeting Pesce or Roy in the offseason


I agree, but as for Pulock, his game was regressing last year. Still a competent defender, but might not be top pair caliber anymore
Jan. 17 at 9:58 p.m.
#15
Thread Starter
BigMeech
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2022
Posts: 1,556
Likes: 349
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
Not at all available but it would probably start with Willander/Brtzustewics + Raty + 1st. Which I highly doubt Vancouver would be willing to pay


your having a laugh mate
Jan. 18 at 12:03 a.m.
#16
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 38,549
Likes: 19,686
Quoting: Canucks123
your having a laugh mate


Term cost more. You don't like it, look elsewhere.
Jan. 18 at 12:34 a.m.
#17
First round bust
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2023
Posts: 851
Likes: 352
I don't like the trade for the Flames. Here's why:
1. The Flames don't need Garland, and that's also a part of the reason Canucks fans like throwing him in trades. Because $5M of cap space are more valuable than what he provides on the ice.
2. Kravtsov is done, and I don't see him returning to the NHL
3. Woo cleared waivers at the beginning of the season and could've been had for free, he will have to pass them again next year if he doesn't make the team.

Okay, so the Flames are getting back what is equivalent to trading up from a 2nd(#43) to a 1st (#30) in 2024. That's not nearly enough in my book. It doesn't matter how many Dubes, Gilberts, and Ruzickas I offer you for Hronek, you won't trade him.

Now the Flames might consider trading Weegar, but unless it's an overpay (Stud prospect or a couple of firsts), I think that would be something they do in the off-season 2025, or 26, when another D prospect is ready to take a step.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll