SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

This is the trade to make

Created by: Jets12Kozy
Team: 2023-24 Winnipeg Jets
Initial Creation Date: Jan. 14, 2024
Published: Jan. 14, 2024
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
Tried to make an interesting offer for Calgary without giving up McGroarty, Barlow, Lambo, Salomonsson.
Great 2 way C in Lindholm is great for perfetti/Ehlers fits one need.

Gritty hard working Tanev who can log big minutes along Jmo and of course is a right ****.

Needs are met just need to work out the trade details
Trades
WPG
  1. Lindholm, Elias ($2,425,000 retained)
  2. Tanev, Christopher ($1,500,000 retained)
CGY
  1. Appleton, Mason
  2. Lucius, Chaz
  3. Rashevsky, Dmitri [Reserve List]
  4. Stanley, Logan
  5. 2024 1st round pick (WPG)
  6. 2024 3rd round pick (WPG)
  7. 2025 2nd round pick (WPG)
Additional Details:
Conditional 2025 2nd becomes 2025 1st if Winnipeg makes the Stanley Cup Final
Buyouts
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2024
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the WPG
Logo of the WPG
Logo of the WPG
Logo of the WPG
2025
Logo of the WPG
Logo of the WPG
Logo of the WPG
Logo of the WPG
Logo of the WPG
2026
Logo of the WPG
Logo of the WPG
Logo of the WPG
Logo of the WPG
Logo of the WPG
Logo of the WPG
Logo of the WPG
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$83,500,000$79,929,524$0$1,275,000$3,570,476
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Winnipeg Jets
$7,142,857$7,142,857
LW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Winnipeg Jets
$6,125,000$6,125,000
C
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Winnipeg Jets
$3,437,500$3,437,500
RW, C
RFA - 2
Logo of the Winnipeg Jets
$894,167$894,167 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
LW, C
RFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$2,425,000$2,425,000
C, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Winnipeg Jets
$6,000,000$6,000,000
RW, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Winnipeg Jets
$2,000,000$2,000,000
LW, RW, C
UFA - 2
Logo of the Winnipeg Jets
$3,250,000$3,250,000
C
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Winnipeg Jets
$4,000,000$4,000,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Winnipeg Jets
$4,000,000$4,000,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Winnipeg Jets
$1,000,000$1,000,000
C, LW, RW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Winnipeg Jets
$1,350,000$1,350,000
LW, RW
RFA - 2
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Winnipeg Jets
$6,250,000$6,250,000
LD
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo of the Calgary Flames
-$375,000-$375,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Winnipeg Jets
$6,166,667$6,166,667
G
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Winnipeg Jets
$3,900,000$3,900,000
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Winnipeg Jets
$3,000,000$3,000,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Winnipeg Jets
$1,750,000$1,750,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Winnipeg Jets
$1,400,000$1,400,000
LD
RFA - 2
Logo of the Winnipeg Jets
$5,875,000$5,875,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Winnipeg Jets
$5,950,000$5,950,000
LD/RD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Winnipeg Jets
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$425,000$425K)
LD
RFA - 1
Logo of the Winnipeg Jets
$775,000$775,000
LW
UFA - 2

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Jan. 14 at 11:47 a.m.
#1
Wpgman
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2019
Posts: 1,072
Likes: 452
Tanev not needed especially how the d is playing right now. Lindholm would be an upgrade at 2C. Way better option than Monahan who is really not an upgrade.
Jets12Kozy, Windjammer, CanMerc and 1 other person liked this.
Jan. 14 at 11:50 a.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2022
Posts: 3,816
Likes: 2,507
i would be ok with offering barlow for lindholm even, especially with an extension in place.

Now that i think about it they wont really be able to afford him next year...
Jan. 14 at 11:50 a.m.
#3
Thread Starter
KFC
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2021
Posts: 1,785
Likes: 481
Edited Jan. 14 at 11:57 a.m.
Quoting: Wpgman
Tanev not needed especially how the d is playing right now. Lindholm would be an upgrade at 2C. Way better option than Monahan who is really not an upgrade.


0 interest in Monahan especially at the prices speculated they want for him lol yikes

And I disagree I think we need a big playoff style defender like tanev in the top 4, id be quite concerned about a top d pairing of Jmo and Demelo getting bullied in the corners and front of the net come playoffs. Our defensive play has been by commission of all 6 players in the ice not necessarily defense specifically, this is our year before cap is going to force some decisions. Go all in!
SomeonesOffended liked this.
Jan. 14 at 11:51 a.m.
#4
Thread Starter
KFC
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2021
Posts: 1,785
Likes: 481
Quoting: drambui
i would be ok with offering barlow for lindholm even, especially with an extension in place.


If it's an extension yeah id consider Lambo/Barlow but with demelo, Dillon perfetti needing deals next summer, as well as Lindholm being a ufa I don't see an extension as very likely
SomeonesOffended liked this.
Jan. 14 at 11:54 a.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2022
Posts: 3,816
Likes: 2,507
Quoting: Jets12Kozy
If it's an extension yeah id consider Lambo/Barlow but with demelo, Dillon perfetti needing deals next summer, as well as Lindholm being a ufa I don't see an extension as very likely


Yeah i agree, i edited my response probably before you replied. Money is gonna be thigh next year, lots of ufa, schmidt will have to be moved too probably.
Jan. 14 at 11:55 a.m.
#6
Thread Starter
KFC
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2021
Posts: 1,785
Likes: 481
Quoting: drambui
Yeah i agree, i edited my response probably before you replied. Money is gonna be thigh next year, lots of ufa, schmidt will have to be moved too probably.


Yeah Schmidt likely gone at the draft or summer, id move him for cap space this year but he's potentially really important for the locker room so keep him around for this run I think
Jan. 14 at 12:08 p.m.
#7
Wpgman
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2019
Posts: 1,072
Likes: 452
Quoting: Jets12Kozy
Yeah Schmidt likely gone at the draft or summer, id move him for cap space this year but he's potentially really important for the locker room so keep him around for this run I think


Schmidt besides his cap is playing solid enough for this year. Unless an offer comes in before TDL that involves him(highly unlikely), he will be bought out in the offseason- business decision just like Wheeler.
Jan. 14 at 12:15 p.m.
#8
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2023
Posts: 540
Likes: 426
Edited Jan. 14 at 12:21 p.m.
Way too much going to CGY
Jets don’t need Tanev, they need Lindholm

Quoting: drambui
i would be ok with offering barlow for lindholm even, especially with an extension in place.

Now that i think about it they wont really be able to afford him next year...

Quoting: Jets12Kozy
If it's an extension yeah id consider Lambo/Barlow but with demelo, Dillon perfetti needing deals next summer, as well as Lindholm being a ufa I don't see an extension as very likely

Only way I offer Barlow is if there’s an extension in place…Lambert is untouchable for me… I wouldn’t trade him at all.
Dillon can walk, we have Chisholm to fill the bottom pairing LD. Schmidt needs to go in the offseason for cap space as well as Iafello…and for me either Namestnikov or Appleton can be moved too.
Add all that to the Cap increase next year and the Jets can absolutely afford Lindholm with an extension.

Connor - Scheifele - Vilardi
Perfetti - Lindholm - Ehlers
Neidereitter - Lowry - Lambert
Barron - Gus/Kupari - ???

Morrissey - DeMelo
Samberg - Pionk
Chisholm - ???

Try to get Barron out of MTL to play on the RHD and fill that bottom line RW slot with depth or acquire through trade or FA.
Jan. 14 at 12:22 p.m.
#9
Thread Starter
KFC
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2021
Posts: 1,785
Likes: 481
Quoting: CanMerc
Way too much going to CGY
Jets don’t need Tanev, they need Lindholm



Only way I offer Barlow is if there’s an extension in place…Lambert is untouchable for me… I wouldn’t trade him at all.
Dillon can walk, we have Chisholm to fill the bottom pairing LD. Schmidt needs to go in the offseason for cap space as well as Iafello…and for me either Namestnikov or Appleton can be moved too.
Add all that to the Cap increase next year and the Jets can absolutely afford Lindholm with an extension.

Connor - Scheifele - Vilardi
Perfetti - Lindholm - Ehlers
Neidereitter - Lowry - Lambert
Barron - Gus/Kupari - ???

Morrissey - DeMelo
Samberg - Pionk
Chisholm - ???

Try to get Barron out of MTL to play on the RHD and fill that bottom line RW slot with depth or acquire through trade or FA


Disagree on Jets not needing Tanev he is a perfect fit for what we need on D
Quoting: Jets12Kozy


And I disagree I think we need a big playoff style defender like tanev in the top 4, id be quite concerned about a top d pairing of Jmo and Demelo getting bullied in the corners and front of the net come playoffs. Our defensive play has been by commission of all 6 players in the ice not necessarily defense specifically, this is our year before cap is going to force some decisions. Go all in!
SomeonesOffended liked this.
Jan. 14 at 12:26 p.m.
#10
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2023
Posts: 540
Likes: 426
Quoting: Jets12Kozy
Disagree on Jets not needing Tanev he is a perfect fit for what we need on D


Lindholm is the bigger need and where we should be putting money first… after that, then we need to address the RD, but Tanev is going to want to get payed on his next contract and he’s not what we need, to be paying what he’ll want.
If we were moving on from Pionk, then yes, I’d agree with you, but not if Pionk is staying.
For me, we need a Pulock
SomeonesOffended liked this.
Jan. 14 at 12:31 p.m.
#11
Thread Starter
KFC
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2021
Posts: 1,785
Likes: 481
Quoting: CanMerc
Lindholm is the bigger need and where we should be putting money first… after that, then we need to address the RD, but Tanev is going to want to get payed on his next contract and he’s not what we need, to be paying what he’ll want.
If we were moving on from Pionk, then yes, I’d agree with you, but not if Pionk is staying.
For me, we need a Pulock


Pulock will cost a ton having just extended and having a bit of a down year, and if we can get Tanev as a rental in the Lindholm deal for not a crazy amount more it's a no brainer he's really a perfect playoff defender in my opinion
SomeonesOffended liked this.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll