SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Lindy x Tanev would take a HUGE offer

Created by: Prime_Jimbo
Team: 2023-24 Vancouver Canucks
Initial Creation Date: Jan. 24, 2024
Published: Jan. 24, 2024
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
Tanev is easily a conditional first with retention

Lindy is probably a first + roster player + prospect

Add the division tax so no conditions on this year's first and a lesser condition, maybe qualify for playoffs next year on the 2025 1st.


Lines will obs shuffle
Trades
VAN
  1. Lindholm, Elias ($2,425,000 retained)
  2. Tanev, Christopher ($2,250,000 retained)
CGY
  1. Kuzmenko, Andrei
  2. Podkolzin, Vasily
  3. 2024 1st round pick (VAN)
  4. 2025 1st round pick (VAN)
Buyouts
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2024
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the NJD
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the VAN
2025
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
2026
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$83,500,000$78,164,167$850,000$0$5,335,833
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
Pettersson, Elias
$7,350,000$7,350,000
C, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
Miller, J.T.
$8,000,000$8,000,000
C, LW, RW
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
Boeser, Brock
$6,650,000$6,650,000
RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
Höglander, Nils
$1,100,000$1,100,000
LW, RW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Calgary Flames
Lindholm, Elias
$2,425,000$2,425,000
C, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
Mikheyev, Ilya
$4,750,000$4,750,000
LW, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
Joshua, Dakota
$825,000$825,000
LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
Blueger, Teddy
$1,900,000$1,900,000
C, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
Garland, Conor
$4,950,000$4,950,000
RW, LW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
Suter, Pius
$1,600,000$1,600,000
C, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
Åman, Nils
$883,750$883,750
C
RFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
Lafferty, Sam
$1,150,000$1,150,000
RW, C, LW
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
Hughes, Quinn
$7,850,000$7,850,000
LD
UFA - 4
Logo of the Calgary Flames
Tanev, Christopher
-$1,125,000-$1,125,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
Demko, Thatcher
$5,000,000$5,000,000
G
UFA - 3
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
Zadorov, Nikita
$3,750,000$3,750,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
Hronek, Filip
$4,400,000$4,400,000
RD
RFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
DeSmith, Casey
$1,800,000$1,800,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
Soucy, Carson
$3,250,000$3,250,000
LD/RD
NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
Myers, Tyler
$6,000,000$6,000,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
Cole, Ian
$3,000,000$3,000,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
Poolman, Tucker
$2,500,000$2,500,000
RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
Waivers ExemptKarlsson, Linus
$883,750$883,750
RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
Brisebois, Guillaume
$775,000$775,000
LD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
Juulsen, Noah
$775,000$775,000
RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
Di Giuseppe, Phillip
$775,000$775,000
LW
UFA - 2

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Jan. 24 at 9:07 p.m.
#1
BigShoots
Big Shoots
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2020
Posts: 3,571
Likes: 1,087
way too much. Take that package somewhere else and you could get a legit 2c with term.
SomeonesOffended liked this.
Jan. 24 at 9:09 p.m.
#2
SomeonesOffended
FKA Bigtittielarper
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2020
Posts: 7,728
Likes: 2,226
Quoting: BigShoots
way too much. Take that package somewhere else and you could get a legit 2c with term.


Yeah Canucks decline that out pod and it’s still a maybe lol
Jan. 24 at 9:21 p.m.
#3
Vancity2196
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2022
Posts: 3,789
Likes: 1,208
Canucks can't afford this deal.
Calgary doesn't have an interest in Podz and Kuzmenko.
Jan. 24 at 9:22 p.m.
#4
palhal
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2015
Posts: 59,763
Likes: 22,796
There shouldn't be a "division" tax. Flames aren't going to be in the playoffs, and those two players won't be Canucks next season. It's not like the Flames are in competition with the Canucks this year.
Jan. 24 at 9:22 p.m.
#5
BeautifulIdiot
This team kills me
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2021
Posts: 3,251
Likes: 1,511
1st 2nd, Kuzy
Jan. 24 at 9:24 p.m.
#6
BigShoots
Big Shoots
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2020
Posts: 3,571
Likes: 1,087
Quoting: SomeonesOffended
Yeah Canucks decline that out pod and it’s still a maybe lol


No team is giving up two 1st for rentals
SomeonesOffended liked this.
Jan. 24 at 9:26 p.m.
#7
Prime_Jimbo
Thread Starter
VAN
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2022
Posts: 6,182
Likes: 1,883
Quoting: BigShoots
way too much. Take that package somewhere else and you could get a legit 2c with term.


Ya, I'm down for a more reasonable add, like Monahan, for a 1st. But I think for these two guys, with retention, it's a massive deal.
Jan. 24 at 9:26 p.m.
#8
Prime_Jimbo
Thread Starter
VAN
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2022
Posts: 6,182
Likes: 1,883
Quoting: BigShoots
No team is giving up two 1st for rentals


It's two players? Both these guys, with retention, will get a first each or an equivalent.

Think about Copp who got a conditional first, 2nd, 5th and Barron. Lindy is better imo.
Jan. 24 at 9:27 p.m.
#9
Prime_Jimbo
Thread Starter
VAN
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2022
Posts: 6,182
Likes: 1,883
Quoting: BeautifulIdiot
1st 2nd, Kuzy


For Lindy?
Jan. 24 at 9:28 p.m.
#10
Prime_Jimbo
Thread Starter
VAN
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2022
Posts: 6,182
Likes: 1,883
Quoting: palhal
There shouldn't be a "division" tax. Flames aren't going to be in the playoffs, and those two players won't be Canucks next season. It's not like the Flames are in competition with the Canucks this year.


I'm good with that but Flames probably feel like if they send multiple players to Van, and they potentially reach the SCF, it's gonna be hard to swallow. Honestly, the tax to me is slight. A first without conditions though this team will have one of the best records. And maybe something next season on the 1st.
Jan. 24 at 9:32 p.m.
#11
palhal
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2015
Posts: 59,763
Likes: 22,796
Quoting: Prime_Jimbo
I'm good with that but Flames probably feel like if they send multiple players to Van, and they potentially reach the SCF, it's gonna be hard to swallow. Honestly, the tax to me is slight. A first without conditions though this team will have one of the best records. And maybe something next season on the 1st.


Flames should take the best deal for their UFAs regardless of who wants to pay the piper. If the Canucks do well in the playoffs, maybe it might be motivation to other teams...especially the Pacific division Flames. Gee, the Canucks have been just treading water for years, and missed playoff last season. And suddenly could be conference finalists. Good motivation for next September, things can change quickly.
Prime_Jimbo liked this.
Jan. 25 at 4:15 p.m.
#12
BigShoots
Big Shoots
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2020
Posts: 3,571
Likes: 1,087
Quoting: Prime_Jimbo
It's two players? Both these guys, with retention, will get a first each or an equivalent.

Think about Copp who got a conditional first, 2nd, 5th and Barron. Lindy is better imo.


I know its two players. It's just not a good trade to move two 1sts for rentals. Moving 1 1st for a rental I don't even like. If your are gonna move two firsts you might as well try and get a young stud center with team control.
Prime_Jimbo liked this.
Jan. 25 at 4:17 p.m.
#13
BigShoots
Big Shoots
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2020
Posts: 3,571
Likes: 1,087
Quoting: Prime_Jimbo
Ya, I'm down for a more reasonable add, like Monahan, for a 1st. But I think for these two guys, with retention, it's a massive deal.


I just don't rate Lindholm super highly. I think he'd certainly help the team but I don't know that his play matches his reputation these days.

Tanev is great and would be a fit but we are kinda looking good on d right now. And Tanev is of course getting older and a rental.
Jan. 25 at 4:23 p.m.
#14
Prime_Jimbo
Thread Starter
VAN
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2022
Posts: 6,182
Likes: 1,883
Quoting: BigShoots
I just don't rate Lindholm super highly. I think he'd certainly help the team but I don't know that his play matches his reputation these days.

Tanev is great and would be a fit but we are kinda looking good on d right now. And Tanev is of course getting older and a rental.


Definitely not $9M for an extension that's been floated.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll