If Dallas gave up Bourque and picks than I can't see Calgary saying no but, I don't think Dallas needs to do that

Dallas doing small trades is the route they should go IMO

Flyers decline. Walker has more value than Hakanpää and flyers will want futures for Walker.

Flames decline easily

I'm asking what they would have to add to the trades. Obviously there would be picks / prospects, this is just the main pieces so that the cap hit is alright for Dallas.

Anyways... I think their main focus should be defense, and that bringing in two RD like Tanev and Walker would put them in a great spot. Lindholm as well would basically give them three 1st lines and in my opinion make them favourites for the cup, but it may be for the best if they just focus on defense.

Does Dallas really need Lindholm? They have lots of depth a center.

In any case, a 1st for Lindholm , a solid prospect, and takes for the cap.

Market will probably dictate a 2nd for Tanev, Kyrou.

For Walker in this situation with taking a contract and retaining it would have to be a 1st or a 2nd + prospects and or more picks.

Troll much?

A cap dump doesn't get you Lindholm and Tanev at 50% retained. And you're slightly over the salary cap.