SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Big Anaheim Trade at Deadline

Created by: TMLBRIAN
Team: 2023-24 New York Rangers
Initial Creation Date: Jan. 31, 2024
Published: Jan. 31, 2024
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
Henrique with a 2 year 4.25m extension.

Team looks very good.

Thoughts?
Trades
1.
MIN
  1. 2024 5th round pick (NYR)
2.
NYR
  1. Henrique, Adam ($2,912,500 retained)
  2. Vatrano, Frank ($1,825,000 retained)
ANA
  1. Othmann, Brennan
  2. 2024 1st round pick (NYR)
  3. 2024 2nd round pick (NYR)
  4. 2025 4th round pick (DAL)
  5. 2026 3rd round pick (NYR)
Buyouts
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2024
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the NYR
2025
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the NYR
2026
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the VAN
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$83,500,000$78,781,166$610,892$882,500$4,718,834
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the New York Rangers
$11,642,857$11,642,857
LW
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo of the New York Rangers
$8,500,000$8,500,000
C
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo of the New York Rangers
$2,325,000$2,325,000
LW, RW
RFA - 2
Logo of the New York Rangers
$6,500,000$6,500,000
LW
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo of the New York Rangers
$5,625,000$5,625,000
C, RW
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$1,825,000$1,825,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the New York Rangers
$828,333$828,333 (Performance Bonus$82,500$82K)
LW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
-$1,456,250-$1,456,250
LW, C
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the New York Rangers
$2,100,000$2,100,000
RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the New York Rangers
$800,000$800,000
RW, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the New York Rangers
$3,641,667$3,641,667
C, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the New York Rangers
$800,000$800,000 (Performance Bonus$300,000$300K)
RW
NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the New York Rangers
$762,500$762,500
C
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the New York Rangers
$3,872,000$3,872,000
LD
RFA - 2
Logo of the New York Rangers
$9,500,000$9,500,000
RD
UFA - 6
Logo of the New York Rangers
$5,666,667$5,666,667
G
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the New York Rangers
$3,000,000$3,000,000
LD
RFA - 1
Logo of the New York Rangers
$8,000,000$8,000,000
RD
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo of the New York Rangers
$825,000$825,000 (Performance Bonus$100,000$100K)
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the New York Rangers
$825,000$825,000
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the New York Rangers
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$400,000$400K)
RD
RFA - 1
Logo of the New York Rangers
$812,500$812,500
LD
RFA - 2
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$850,000$850,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the New York Rangers
$4,437,500$4,437,500
C, LW
UFA - 4

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Jan. 31 at 7:15 p.m.
#1
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 40,481
Likes: 25,381
I would accept that offer as the Anaheim GM. Whether any Ranger fans would accept it is another question entirely.
Jan. 31 at 7:17 p.m.
#2
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 9,532
Likes: 4,174
Quoting: OldNYIfan
I would accept that offer as the Anaheim GM. Whether any Ranger fans would accept it is another question entirely.


What's the least you would accept for both of those guys, 50% retained. Did I over shoot the value here?
Jan. 31 at 7:17 p.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2021
Posts: 15,556
Likes: 11,937
Quoting: TMLBRIAN
What's the least you would accept for both of those guys, 50% retained. Did I over shoot the value here?


Add someone like Cuylle for that imo
Jan. 31 at 7:18 p.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2021
Posts: 5,269
Likes: 2,299
Rangers shouldn’t be extending a soon to be 34 year old center. They have to many old players on the decline
Fox_Czar_Cup liked this.
Jan. 31 at 7:18 p.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 198
Likes: 63
Probably not with Othmann but yes with Kakko.

2nd & 4th for Henrique
Kakko, 1st and 3rd for Frankie
GiggywithGibby liked this.
Jan. 31 at 7:20 p.m.
#6
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 9,532
Likes: 4,174
Quoting: nyrfan81
Probably not with Othmann but yes with Kakko.

2nd & 4th for Henrique
Kakko, 1st and 3rd for Frankie


Do you value Othmann or Kakko as being more valuable? I assume Kakko...
Jan. 31 at 7:22 p.m.
#7
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 198
Likes: 63
Quoting: nyrfan81
Probably not with Othmann but yes with Kakko.

2nd & 4th for Henrique
Kakko, 1st and 3rd for Frankie


And i didnt do the math but you might not need a full 50% retention.
Jan. 31 at 7:23 p.m.
#8
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 198
Likes: 63
Quoting: TMLBRIAN
Do you value Othmann or Kakko as being more valuable? I assume Kakko...


Othmann imo.
Jan. 31 at 7:26 p.m.
#9
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 9,532
Likes: 4,174
Quoting: nyrfan81
Probably not with Othmann but yes with Kakko.

2nd & 4th for Henrique
Kakko, 1st and 3rd for Frankie


Quoting: nyrfan81
Othmann imo.


Also your breakdown is very similar to how I had it as well.

And fair. As an outsider, I still think Kakko wins the value off there though.
Jan. 31 at 7:26 p.m.
#10
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2021
Posts: 5,269
Likes: 2,299
Quoting: nyrfan81
Othmann imo.


How is othmann more valuable than Kakko lol
Fox_Czar_Cup liked this.
Jan. 31 at 7:29 p.m.
#11
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 40,481
Likes: 25,381
Quoting: TMLBRIAN
What's the least you would accept for both of those guys, 50% retained. Did I over shoot the value here?


Quoting: nyrfan81
Probably not with Othmann but yes with Kakko.

2nd & 4th for Henrique
Kakko, 1st and 3rd for Frankie

I'm with @nyrfan81 here. You're overboard by one of the later picks at least (a 2025 fourth and 2026 third have about the same value due to the year difference) with Othmann in there.
nyrfan81 liked this.
Jan. 31 at 7:30 p.m.
#12
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 9,532
Likes: 4,174
Quoting: OldNYIfan
I'm with nyrfan81 here. You're overboard by one of the later picks at least (a 2025 fourth and 2026 third have about the same value due to the year difference) with Othmann in there.


Fair! So just remove either the 3rd or 4th? So quite close. I can see this trade making a lot of sense for both teams.

Thanks for the feedback!
OldNYIfan liked this.
Jan. 31 at 7:39 p.m.
#13
aecliptic
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 2,947
Likes: 1,284
This is just bad from a value standpoint compared to what they could get from other teams.
Jan. 31 at 8:35 p.m.
#14
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 9,532
Likes: 4,174
Quoting: aecliptic
This is just bad from a value standpoint compared to what they could get from other teams.


bad for who?
Jan. 31 at 8:37 p.m.
#15
aecliptic
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 2,947
Likes: 1,284
Quoting: TMLBRIAN
bad for who?


The Rangers.
Feb. 1 at 9:46 a.m.
#16
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 198
Likes: 63
Quoting: Rags21
How is othmann more valuable than Kakko lol


He has more potential and is a goal scorer which the Ranges need. Kakko is a middle six power forward and just never developed the way the Rangers hoped. Yes he flashes at times and drives possession but the results are just not there.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll