Lankinen doesn't fetch half that.

didn't realize I was talking to Barry Trotz
Lankinen is having the better season then Saros and is lower cap hit and is just a rental and Markstrom & Saros will cost way more

Imagine thinking that's a clever comeback... meanwhile Lankinen has an .899 with with only 4 quality starts out of 10 and 73rd in goals saved above expected per 60. Seriously, what are you on about?

Do you know who Kevin Woodley is?
He is the goalie analyst that has been saying for months on Sekeres & Price and other pods that Lankinen is the best value to trade for either Oilers, Kings or Devils
The Preds forward scoring is a tire fire, if you score 3 on them it's over meaning Preds need to activate their D to get shots on goal as their forward offence is putrid and outside of Forsberg, Josi, Nyquest and ROR nobody else is scoring on a regular basis

Best value bc he’ll cost like a 3rd or 4th. Not this

i think the market is going to push the price up

Kent Hughes just publically admitted he has been trying to unload one of Primeau or Allen for months.

Which buyers do you see who Lankinen helps?

I think the Kings and Devils will be in a bidding war and I believe the Avs are going to trade for Allen but are slow rolling the Habs to get him for cheaper

Explain what makes Lankinen an upgrade from Daws Schmid and Vitek?


Since the new year, just 3 goalies have a worse GSAx than Lankinen .

Since the beginning of December he’s been significantly worse than both Daws and Vitek. Why would NJD pay for him?

like I said he is not going to cost the Devils a roster player and get to keep their young goalies where Markstrom and Saros you have to peel off at least one high draft pick +++ instead of one 2nd and two middle picks and no roster players
dude this is just my way of seeing it, you don't have to agree with me

Not sure how any of that means Lankinen is going to fetch a 2nd, 3rd and 5th. Better goalies can be had for less.