SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Frisky Deadline

Created by: oilers9783
Team: 2023-24 Edmonton Oilers
Initial Creation Date: Feb. 17, 2024
Published: Feb. 17, 2024
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Trades
1.
EDM
  1. Tanev, Christopher ($2,250,000 retained)
CGY
  1. Ceci, Cody
  2. 2024 1st round pick (EDM)
  3. 2025 6th round pick (EDM)
2.
ANA
  1. 2024 5th round pick (EDM)
3.
EDM
  1. Tarasenko, Vladimir ($2,500,000 retained)
Additional Details:
Unsure if this is enough, what would you want Sens fans?
OTT
  1. Bourgault, Xavier
  2. Janmark, Mattias
  3. 2024 2nd round pick (EDM)
  4. 2024 6th round pick (NSH)
Buyouts
Buried
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2024
Logo of the EDM
2025
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
2026
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
21$83,500,000$76,916,667$850,000$4,200,000$6,583,333
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$5,125,000$5,125,000
LW, C
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$12,500,000$12,500,000
C
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$5,500,000$5,500,000
RW, LW
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$2,100,000$2,100,000
C
RFA - 2
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$8,500,000$8,500,000
C, LW
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Ottawa Senators
$0$0
RW
NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$5,125,000$5,125,000
LW, RW
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$650,000$650K)
LW, C
RFA - 1
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$775,000$775,000 (Performance Bonus$325,000$325K)
RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$2,750,000$2,750,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$425,000$425,000
C, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$775,000$775,000 (Performance Bonus$3,225,000$3M)
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$900,000$900,000
C, RW
UFA - 2
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$6,000,000$6,000,000
LD/RD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$3,900,000$3,900,000
RD
RFA - 2
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$2,600,000$2,600,000
G
UFA - 3
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$9,250,000$9,250,000
LD
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo of the Calgary Flames
-$1,125,000-$1,125,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$762,500$762,500
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$2,750,000$2,750,000
LD/RD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$762,500$762,500
RD
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Feb. 17 at 3:06 a.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2024
Posts: 230
Likes: 41
Calgary doesn't touch that
Take out the 6th and add Holloway
Otherwise no chance retaining and take a cap dump
Feb. 17 at 4:57 a.m.
#2
What time is it
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2023
Posts: 304
Likes: 71
Quoting: Dubcity
Calgary doesn't touch that
Take out the 6th and add Holloway
Otherwise no chance retaining and take a cap dump


WTF are you talking about?... A 1st would do it. Ceci has another year, Holloway is taking a big step and worth keeping as a cheap replacement who can play up the lineup next season. The kid could be a top 6 NHLer in a couple years. Who are you watching?
Ceci + 1st + 6th is an overpay!
Feb. 17 at 5:07 a.m.
#3
TkachukNorris79
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2018
Posts: 1,256
Likes: 377
Needs to be a 1st for Tarasenko with retention, he's one of the best forwards available - if you can only give a 2nd then the prospect needs to be much better (your 2nd round pick will be like 60th overall)

I'd consider the 2nd with Holloway, otherwise you offer easily gets beat.

Quoting: SHOWTIME_TTV
WTF are you talking about?... A 1st would do it. Ceci has another year, Holloway is taking a big step and worth keeping as a cheap replacement who can play up the lineup next season. The kid could be a top 6 NHLer in a couple years. Who are you watching?
Ceci + 1st + 6th is an overpay!


Ceci having one more year is does not add to his value, it lowers it. He's a straight cap dump, so while a 1st and a 6th may (probably not) get Tanev, adding Ceci drops that value.
Feb. 17 at 5:18 a.m.
#4
What time is it
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2023
Posts: 304
Likes: 71
Quoting: TkachukNorris79
Needs to be a 1st for Tarasenko with retention, he's one of the best forwards available - if you can only give a 2nd then the prospect needs to be much better (your 2nd round pick will be like 60th overall)

I'd consider the 2nd with Holloway, otherwise you offer easily gets beat.



Ceci having one more year is does not add to his value, it lowers it. He's a straight cap dump, so while a 1st and a 6th may (probably not) get Tanev, adding Ceci drops that value.


That's a trash opinion! Tanev @ 50% retained for a 1st straight up is his peak! Adding a replacement that CGY could flip next TDL or sooner is Fn ludacris. Ceci & the 6th is completely unnecessary. Add a conditional 2025 3rd if they win the cup, nothing more!
Feb. 17 at 6:33 a.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2024
Posts: 230
Likes: 41
Quoting: SHOWTIME_TTV
WTF are you talking about?... A 1st would do it. Ceci has another year, Holloway is taking a big step and worth keeping as a cheap replacement who can play up the lineup next season. The kid could be a top 6 NHLer in a couple years. Who are you watching?
Ceci + 1st + 6th is an overpay!


I'm aware he has 1 more year, he would 100% be a cap dump, exactly why we don't want him. It's not enough to trade with Edmonton period. I agree Holloway has potential exactly why he needs to be included to make this happen. Edmonton is no good.
TkachukNorris79 liked this.
Feb. 17 at 6:36 a.m.
#6
TkachukNorris79
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2018
Posts: 1,256
Likes: 377
Quoting: SHOWTIME_TTV
That's a trash opinion! Tanev 50% retained for a 1st straight up is his peak! Adding a replacement that CGY could flip next TDL or sooner is Fn ludacris. Ceci & the 6th is completely unnecessary. Add a conditional 2025 3rd if they win the cup, nothing more!


Calling peoples' opinions trash on here is pretty narrow-minded. Especially when Ceci is pretty widely considered a cap dump by the majority of fans. He's a bottom pairing defenceman at best making 3x more than he should.

What team views him as an asset? I don't think your opinion is trash, but it's extremely biased.
Feb. 17 at 8:16 a.m.
#7
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 3,605
Likes: 915
Quoting: SHOWTIME_TTV
WTF are you talking about?... A 1st would do it. Ceci has another year, Holloway is taking a big step and worth keeping as a cheap replacement who can play up the lineup next season. The kid could be a top 6 NHLer in a couple years. Who are you watching?
Ceci + 1st + 6th is an overpay!


See Adding Ceci devalues the move, Calgary will likely be offered a 1st without that bad of a cap dump attached & no they can’t flip Ceci next TDL or else you wouldn’t be trying to dump him on Calgary rn, you’d move him separately to create the cap space you’d need for Tanev, I’m also gonna say if the Flames have issue with trading to Treliving then they're certainly gonna have issues trading to their provincial rival & that jacks up the price especially with retention which the Flames front office hates to ever do
Feb. 17 at 8:30 a.m.
#8
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2021
Posts: 15,571
Likes: 11,955
We just keep Carrick and resign him
Feb. 17 at 9:27 a.m.
#9
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2022
Posts: 1,895
Likes: 916
the blanket asking price for Tarasenko at 50% retained is a 1st. not positive the Sens will manage to get it considering his NTC, but that's the asking price
Feb. 17 at 6:18 p.m.
#10
What time is it
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2023
Posts: 304
Likes: 71
Quoting: TkachukNorris79
Calling peoples' opinions trash on here is pretty narrow-minded. Especially when Ceci is pretty widely considered a cap dump by the majority of fans. He's a bottom pairing defenceman at best making 3x more than he should.

What team views him as an asset? I don't think your opinion is trash, but it's extremely biased.


It's not biased to say that Ceci who's played significant mins, has a low cap hit considering his deployment, is a RHD RD which is a coveted position and has 64 playoff games under his belt isn't a cap dump!
You're another clueless person who has very likely never played hockey at an elite level and just relies on someone elses math equations to tell them who is good and who isn't.
Ceci has value, he's not a cap dump. You're confusing the need to move cap to fit another player in with the value the players have. If EDM has to move Ceci to upgrade the position than the team getting him will want to extend him or flip him to another team for assets. This trade proposal is embarassing and when the TDL comes and passes and you see Tanev get moved I hope you realize then how stupid you are to defend this crap.
Feb. 17 at 6:25 p.m.
#11
What time is it
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2023
Posts: 304
Likes: 71
Quoting: T0R
See Adding Ceci devalues the move, Calgary will likely be offered a 1st without that bad of a cap dump attached & no they can’t flip Ceci next TDL or else you wouldn’t be trying to dump him on Calgary rn, you’d move him separately to create the cap space you’d need for Tanev, I’m also gonna say if the Flames have issue with trading to Treliving then they're certainly gonna have issues trading to their provincial rival & that jacks up the price especially with retention which the Flames front office hates to ever do


You need to keep up with recent events. CGY has made it clear that they're not avoiding trades within their division(hence the trade with VAN).
Ceci doesn't devalue the trade. He's not even necessary(neither is the 6th), that's my point! Tanev won't be more than a late 1st and will come with retention(pretty standard stuff for that return). Believe it or not but if EDM got Tanev than TOR would be trying to get Ceci if he's available. EDM could realistically add Tanev and keep Ceci with a 3rd party team. Ceci has value! This trade is just crap!
Feb. 17 at 9:55 p.m.
#12
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 3,605
Likes: 915
Quoting: SHOWTIME_TTV
You need to keep up with recent events. CGY has made it clear that they're not avoiding trades within their division(hence the trade with VAN).
Ceci doesn't devalue the trade. He's not even necessary(neither is the 6th), that's my point! Tanev won't be more than a late 1st and will come with retention(pretty standard stuff for that return). Believe it or not but if EDM got Tanev than TOR would be trying to get Ceci if he's available. EDM could realistically add Tanev and keep Ceci with a 3rd party team. Ceci has value! This trade is just crap!


LMAO Leafs wouldn’t go near Ceci again bud but keep thinking whatever you want & news flash trading to a despised Provincial & Divisional Rival is different then a Divisional rival, Edmonton has to likely pay extra not to mention Vancouver overpaid on Lindholm & they asked for no retention
Feb. 18 at 6:14 a.m.
#13
What time is it
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2023
Posts: 304
Likes: 71
Quoting: T0R
LMAO Leafs wouldn’t go near Ceci again bud but keep thinking whatever you want & news flash trading to a despised Provincial & Divisional Rival is different then a Divisional rival, Edmonton has to likely pay extra not to mention Vancouver overpaid on Lindholm & they asked for no retention


You don't know. At the end of the day it will come down to cost and who's willing to pay. Tanev is a rental... Too many of you seem to forget that.
The entire point is the VALUE of the trade. It's awful and an unnecessary overpay. EDM can rid themselves of Ceci without having to pay to do it. This is getting stupid how clueless ppl like you are.
TOR fans are oblivious to their own teams flaws! Defense is still lacking, depth is weak and goaltending is incredibly streaky.
The entire hockey world outside of TOR loves that you're the laughing stock of the league by mentioning 4 little numbers... 1967!
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll