SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Sharks

Created by: Cabbie91
Team: 2024-25 San Jose Sharks
Initial Creation Date: Feb. 23, 2024
Published: Feb. 23, 2024
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Free Agent Signings
RESERVE LISTYEARSCAP HIT
3$950,000
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
2$1,400,000
2$950,000
2$1,250,000
1$900,000
1$900,000
3$2,150,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
2$3,000,000
1$3,000,000
2$2,350,000
1$1,000,000
CREATEDYEARSCAP HIT
Silayev, Anton
3$950,000
Trades
1.
SJS
  1. Berggren, Jonatan [RFA Rights]
DET
  1. Emberson, Ty
  2. 2025 3rd round pick (SJS)
2.
SJS
  1. Abruzzese, Nick
  2. Timmins, Conor
  3. 2024 1st round pick (TOR)
Buyouts
Retained Salary Transactions
Buried
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2024
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the NJD
Logo of the VGK
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the NJD
2025
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the WPG
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the WSH
2026
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
22$87,500,000$59,702,500$0$1,250,000$27,797,500

Roster

Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
LW
RFA - 2
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$6,750,000$6,750,000
C
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$1,450,000$1,450,000
RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$950,000$950,000
C, LW
RFA
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$8,000,000$8,000,000
C
M-NTC
UFA - 3
$2,150,000$2,150,000
RW, LW
RFA
$2,350,000$2,350,000
LW, C
UFA
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$950,000$950,000
C
RFA
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$5,000,000$5,000,000
C, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$800,000$800,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$2,000,000$2,000,000
C
UFA - 1
$1,000,000$1,000,000
RW
UFA
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
$3,000,000$3,000,000
LD
UFA
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$1,400,000$1,400,000
RD
RFA
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$2,350,000$2,350,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$894,167$894,167 (Performance Bonus$400,000$400K)
LD
RFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$1,250,000$1,250,000
RD
UFA - 2
$3,000,000$3,000,000
G
UFA
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$2,750,000$2,750,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$1,100,000$1,100,000
RD
RFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$1,100,000$1,100,000
LD/RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$775,000$775,000
LW, C
RFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Feb. 23 at 10:02 a.m.
#1
Buffbry
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2017
Posts: 8,931
Likes: 5,360
Wings pass, they can use bergs in a bigger deal
Feb. 23 at 10:03 a.m.
#2
Future Norris guy
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2022
Posts: 15,605
Likes: 8,624
Detroit passes, Jonatan Berggren only gets moved in a package deal for Jakob Chychrun, Noah Hanifin or homeboy Matt Roy.
Feb. 23 at 10:05 a.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2016
Posts: 2,080
Likes: 865
Emberson's got great underlying stats this year. I wouldn't be upset by this whatsoever.

Many Wings fans might not like it because he's not a "big" name, but oh well.
Feb. 23 at 10:06 a.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2019
Posts: 6,288
Likes: 3,037
Edited Feb. 23 at 10:15 a.m.
No one is giving you a 1st for Mario Ferraro. He's just not very good. There's no reasonable expectation that he meets the play that would justify that kind of cost elsewhere.
Feb. 23 at 10:40 a.m.
#5
sharcuda22
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2022
Posts: 1,757
Likes: 551
Quoting: Byrr
No one is giving you a 1st for Mario Ferraro. He's just not very good. There's no reasonable expectation that he meets the play that would justify that kind of cost elsewhere.


This guy doesnt watch Mario Ferraro play hockeyyyyyyyy. Yeah man who would want a cost controlled team controlled legit middle pair guy.
Feb. 23 at 11:57 a.m.
#6
whatsmyageagain281
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2017
Posts: 368
Likes: 77
Quoting: sharcuda22
This guy doesnt watch Mario Ferraro play hockeyyyyyyyy. Yeah man who would want a cost controlled team controlled legit middle pair guy.


While I'll agree he definitely doesn't fit the description of "not very good", I still agree he's not worth a 1st rounder tbh. In that package with the other assets I think a 3rd is more realistic and maybe a 2nd if one of the two players are removed. Not a 1st though.
Feb. 23 at 12:09 p.m.
#7
sharcuda22
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2022
Posts: 1,757
Likes: 551
Quoting: whatsmyageagain281
While I'll agree he definitely doesn't fit the description of "not very good", I still agree he's not worth a 1st rounder tbh. In that package with the other assets I think a 3rd is more realistic and maybe a 2nd if one of the two players are removed. Not a 1st though.


I think ferarro is worth a late first but more likely a second, it would definitely take a first for someone to get him because of how the sharks value him. Ferraro is definitely a shine in the right situation type player, which I wouldnt spend a first on either. The other pieces in this deal aren’t really consequential. Timmins and Abruzzese are both played NHL games type players.
Feb. 27 at 10:56 a.m.
#8
whatsmyageagain281
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2017
Posts: 368
Likes: 77
Quoting: sharcuda22
I think ferarro is worth a late first but more likely a second, it would definitely take a first for someone to get him because of how the sharks value him. Ferraro is definitely a shine in the right situation type player, which I wouldnt spend a first on either. The other pieces in this deal aren’t really consequential. Timmins and Abruzzese are both played NHL games type players.


I would disagree that the players are inconsequential. They're both young still, 24 and 25, and can be serviceable NHL players. Look at how Barabanov turned out and I'm sure lots of people would've viewed him the same way. Of course, the pick is still the biggest part of the return, but I think so many people just write off any other piece in a deal if they're not an immediately relevant NHLer lol
Feb. 27 at 1:33 p.m.
#9
sharcuda22
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2022
Posts: 1,757
Likes: 551
Quoting: whatsmyageagain281
I would disagree that the players are inconsequential. They're both young still, 24 and 25, and can be serviceable NHL players. Look at how Barabanov turned out and I'm sure lots of people would've viewed him the same way. Of course, the pick is still the biggest part of the return, but I think so many people just write off any other piece in a deal if they're not an immediately relevant NHLer lol


They are inconsequential to the sharks given our position and our prospect pool. We already have four dmen at Timmins level or better that will need to compete for ice time, and full bottom six as well.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll