SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Deadline

Created by: RyanMclovin
Team: 2023-24 Edmonton Oilers
Initial Creation Date: Feb. 25, 2024
Published: Feb. 25, 2024
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Trades
1.
EDM
  1. Buchnevich, Pavel ($2,900,000 retained)
STL
  1. Broberg, Philip
  2. Janmark, Mattias
  3. 2024 1st round pick (EDM)
  4. 2024 2nd round pick (EDM)
  5. 2026 2nd round pick (EDM)
2.
CGY
  1. Akey, Beau
  2. Bourgault, Xavier
  3. Campbell, Jack
  4. 2024 5th round pick (EDM)
  5. 2025 1st round pick (EDM)
  6. 2025 3rd round pick (EDM)
3.
EDM
  1. Carrier, Alexandre ($1,250,000 retained)
NSH
  1. Ceci, Cody
  2. Lavoie, Raphael
  3. 2025 4th round pick (EDM)
  4. 2026 1st round pick (EDM)
Buyouts
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2024
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the NSH
2025
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
2026
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
21$83,500,000$83,929,167$850,000$4,200,000-$429,167
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$5,125,000$5,125,000
LW, C
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$12,500,000$12,500,000
C
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$5,500,000$5,500,000
RW, LW
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$2,900,000$2,900,000
LW, RW, C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$8,500,000$8,500,000
C, LW
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$2,750,000$2,750,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$5,125,000$5,125,000
LW, RW
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$2,100,000$2,100,000
C
RFA - 2
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$775,000$775,000 (Performance Bonus$325,000$325K)
RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$775,000$775,000
RW, C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$650,000$650K)
LW, C
RFA - 1
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$900,000$900,000
C, RW
UFA - 2
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$6,000,000$6,000,000
LD/RD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$3,900,000$3,900,000
RD
RFA - 2
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$6,000,000$6,000,000
G
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$9,250,000$9,250,000
LD
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo of the Nashville Predators
$1,250,000$1,250,000
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$2,600,000$2,600,000
G
UFA - 3
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$2,750,000$2,750,000
LD/RD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$762,500$762,500
RD
UFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$775,000$775,000 (Performance Bonus$3,225,000$3M)
RW, LW
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Feb. 25 at 7:01 a.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2024
Posts: 150
Likes: 25
The only trade that goes through is Carrier
Feb. 25 at 7:33 a.m.
#2
V1NnY2
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2018
Posts: 349
Likes: 103
Quoting: Jonas_Seagull
The only trade that goes through is Carrier


What’s wrong with the STL trade? I think both teams say yes on this one too.
Only the CGY one I don’t see happening
Feb. 25 at 7:47 a.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2018
Posts: 667
Likes: 255
Quoting: V1NnY2
What’s wrong with the STL trade? I think both teams say yes on this one too.
Only the CGY one I don’t see happening


It’s a quality over quantity thing. What you’ve got is Broberg a first and second for Buch. Another second for retention and Janmark has zero value. That offer would be beaten in either prospect quality or pick compensation
Jonas_Seagull and mokumboi liked this.
Feb. 25 at 8:03 a.m.
#4
Xercuses
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2021
Posts: 13,506
Likes: 3,616
Quoting: V1NnY2
What’s wrong with the STL trade? I think both teams say yes on this one too.
Only the CGY one I don’t see happening


It’s simply not enough for Buch, also I can’t see them trading him without a high end RHD prospect coming back
Feb. 25 at 8:36 a.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2021
Posts: 2,596
Likes: 925
Quoting: StLHockey
It’s a quality over quantity thing. What you’ve got is Broberg a first and second for Buch. Another second for retention and Janmark has zero value. That offer would be beaten in either prospect quality or pick compensation


Quoting: xercuses
It’s simply not enough for Buch, also I can’t see them trading him without a high end RHD prospect coming back


This is a good offer. Think Blues would accept if trade him this year.
Feb. 25 at 8:39 a.m.
#6
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2024
Posts: 150
Likes: 25
Quoting: V1NnY2
What’s wrong with the STL trade? I think both teams say yes on this one too.
Only the CGY one I don’t see happening


Broberg doesn’t have the value that you think he does
Feb. 25 at 9:51 a.m.
#7
Xercuses
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2021
Posts: 13,506
Likes: 3,616
Quoting: noted
This is a good offer. Think Blues would accept if trade him this year.


I very much doubt it doesn’t start at 2 firsts plus a good prospect
That’s what’s being reported
StLHockey liked this.
Feb. 25 at 10:03 a.m.
#8
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2024
Posts: 230
Likes: 41
That package to Calgary isn't even big enough for just dumping Campbell let alone getting Markstrom
Feb. 25 at 10:05 a.m.
#9
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2021
Posts: 2,596
Likes: 925
Quoting: xercuses
I very much doubt it doesn’t start at 2 firsts plus a good prospect
That’s what’s being reported


I value Broberg higher than a late first. He’d play immediately for Blues. Realize others may think differently.
Feb. 25 at 10:05 a.m.
#10
mokumboi
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2019
Posts: 29,307
Likes: 11,369
Quoting: xercuses
It’s simply not enough for Buch, also I can’t see them trading him without a high end RHD prospect coming back


Why specifically RD?
Feb. 25 at 11:04 a.m.
#11
Xercuses
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2021
Posts: 13,506
Likes: 3,616
Quoting: mokumboi
Why specifically RD?


I Think thats our biggest weakness in our prospect pool atm, at least on the left side we have lidstein, Scotty P, and Loof to an extent RD we have nothing
Feb. 26 at 2:28 a.m.
#12
Thread Starter
Pro
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2022
Posts: 352
Likes: 89
Quoting: Dubcity
That package to Calgary isn't even big enough for just dumping Campbell let alone getting Markstrom


Akey is a very good RHD prospect and bourgault will probably be a good 3rd line C/RW plus a first in a year Calgary does not have one from the trade to Montreal plus extra is a very decent future haul for one player they do not need to retain on
Feb. 26 at 8:40 a.m.
#13
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2024
Posts: 230
Likes: 41
It's an okay return but not for Markstrom with Campbell as the cap dump period. As I said that barely covers the cost of Campbell.
Feb. 26 at 9:30 a.m.
#14
Thread Starter
Pro
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2022
Posts: 352
Likes: 89
Quoting: Dubcity
It's an okay return but not for Markstrom with Campbell as the cap dump period. As I said that barely covers the cost of Campbell.


Well right now most of the league is in a cap on cap out right now but I would imagine only the one bad contract plus all those futures for the one player unretained who makes more anyway wouldn’t be a bad plan and since the flames desperately need a retool/rebuild it’s not like the flames necessarily need 100% of their cap space right now as they won’t be competing.
Feb. 26 at 9:43 a.m.
#15
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2024
Posts: 230
Likes: 41
Quoting: RyanMclovin
Well right now most of the league is in a cap on cap out right now but I would imagine only the one bad contract plus all those futures for the one player unretained who makes more anyway wouldn’t be a bad plan and since the flames desperately need a retool/rebuild it’s not like the flames necessarily need 100% of their cap space right now as they won’t be competing.


Your right so they should just help out there biggest rival out of there worst contract, giving them a top goalie for a sub par/ discounted return because they won't necessarily being using all there cap right now. That makes sense
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll