SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Blow-Up and Glow-Up

Created by: HCSG
Team: 2024-25 Pittsburgh Penguins
Initial Creation Date: Feb. 27, 2024
Published: Feb. 27, 2024
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Free Agent Signings
RESERVE LISTYEARSCAP HIT
1$800,000
1$800,000
1$800,000
1$800,000
3$925,000
3$925,000
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
1$900,000
3$925,000
1$800,000
1$800,000
1$800,000
1$875,000
1$875,000
2$800,000
2$800,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
1$850,000
1$800,000
1$800,000
1$800,000
1$1,200,000
2$2,600,000
3$2,750,000
1$950,000
6$5,750,000
2$4,750,000
6$8,850,000
Trades
1.
PIT
  1. Broberg, Philip [RFA Rights]
  2. Campbell, Jack
  3. 2024 1st round pick (EDM)
  4. 2025 1st round pick (EDM)
Additional Details:
Includes Mattias Janmark
2.
PIT
  1. 2024 2nd round pick (FLA)
Additional Details:
Includes Jason Zucker
ARI
  1. Rakell, Rickard
  2. 2024 1st round pick (EDM)
3.
PIT
  1. 2025 2nd round pick (NJD)
  2. 2026 2nd round pick (NJD)
NJD
  1. Graves, Ryan ($2,000,000 retained)
4.
PIT
  1. Brisson, Brendan
  2. 2024 1st round pick (VGK)
  3. 2024 2nd round pick (VGK)
VGK
  1. Smith, Reilly
Additional Details:
Includes Jake Guentzel w/ 50% Retention
5.
PIT
  1. 2024 3rd round pick (CAR)
CAR
    Alex Nedeljkovic w/ 50% Retention
    6.
    OTT
    1. 2024 1st round pick (VGK)
    2. 2024 2nd round pick (VGK)
    Buyouts
    Retained Salary Transactions
    Buried
    DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
    2024
    Logo of the PIT
    Logo of the FLA
    Logo of the CAR
    Logo of the PIT
    Logo of the PIT
    Logo of the PIT
    Logo of the NYR
    2025
    Logo of the PIT
    Logo of the EDM
    Logo of the NJD
    Logo of the PIT
    Logo of the PIT
    Logo of the PIT
    Logo of the PIT
    Logo of the PIT
    2026
    Logo of the PIT
    Logo of the PIT
    Logo of the NJD
    Logo of the PIT
    Logo of the SJS
    Logo of the PIT
    Logo of the PIT
    Logo of the PIT
    Logo of the CHI
    ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
    23$87,500,000$87,454,342$0$0$45,658
    Left WingCentreRight Wing
    Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
    $875,000$875,000
    RW, LW
    UFA
    Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
    $8,700,000$8,700,000
    C
    NMC
    UFA - 1
    $8,850,000$8,850,000
    RW
    UFA
    $5,750,000$5,750,000
    LW, RW
    UFA
    Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
    $6,100,000$6,100,000
    C
    NMC
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
    $5,125,000$5,125,000
    RW, LW
    NMC
    UFA - 4
    Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
    $875,000$875,000
    C, LW
    RFA - 2
    $4,750,000$4,750,000
    LW, C
    UFA
    Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
    $800,000$800,000
    RW
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
    $925,000$925,000
    LW
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
    $2,450,000$2,450,000
    C
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
    $2,000,000$2,000,000
    C, RW
    M-NTC
    UFA - 2
    Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
    Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
    $4,025,175$4,025,175
    LD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
    $10,000,000$10,000,000
    RD
    NMC
    UFA - 3
    Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
    $2,600,000$2,600,000
    G
    UFA
    Logo of the Ottawa Senators
    $4,600,000$4,600,000
    LD/RD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
    $6,100,000$6,100,000
    RD
    NMC
    UFA - 4
    $1,200,000$1,200,000
    G
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
    $775,000$775,000
    LD
    RFA - 1
    $2,750,000$2,750,000
    RD
    UFA
    ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
    Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
    $900,000$900,000
    LW, RW
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Vegas Golden Knights
    $925,000$925,000
    C, LW, RW
    RFA - 1
    Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
    $800,000$800,000
    RD
    UFA

    Embed Code

    • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
    • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

    Text-Embed

    Click to Highlight
    Feb. 27 at 6:19 p.m.
    #26
    I Love J Boqvist
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jan. 2023
    Posts: 11,989
    Likes: 3,173
    Quoting: Mr_Gardoki
    That's not how things work. Graves left NJ because NJ has/have a bevy of young dmen ready to make the jump and wanted to keep Meier. NJ had different priorities which had nothing to do with Graves' value.

    As far as your other thoughts, I honestly don't even know what you're getting at. My point is a good proven player having a bad year doesn't make him a cap-dump or in position for his team to have to retain or pay another team to take him. I also stated that if he was two years in and nothing changed? Then yeah, they'd probably have to pay or retain.

    In this scenario, GM's will recognize a good player with a bad year/bad fit and capitalize by acquiring him at a discounted price. If Graves was moved, the Pens probably get a 3rd, maybe a little less or they may have to take another contract back with a player in a similar situation. That's like saying NJ would have to retain on Meier if they wanted to move him and we both know that's not the case and relative to Graves' season, Meier is having a far worse one.


    NJD decided Ryan Graves wasn’t worth 4.5 million x 6 years to them (probably even less as historically players will take less to not have to move their family)

    And unless you’re suggesting Graves took a discount to play in Pittsburgh, it’s likely that almost all of the other teams in the NHL decided the same.
    Feb. 27 at 6:21 p.m.
    #27
    Banned
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jul. 2018
    Posts: 9,687
    Likes: 4,536
    Quoting: dgibb10
    Which part is incorrect? Are you denying the fact that all 32 teams had the opportunity to sign Ryan Graves this offseason for 4.5 million (or more if they valued him as such), if they wished without giving up any assets.

    Are you denying graves struggles this year?

    Are you denying graves 12 team NTC that would prevent a number of potential suitors from acquiring him at all?


    Your general thought-process is wrong. I'm not sure why you're asking weird questions. I completely stated earlier that Graves has not been a good fit. Every situation with a player is different on why they may be on the outs with their respective teams, but you're treating this like some kind of math equation and that's now how this goes down.

    Yes, the clause affects things, but it only limits the teams they can negotiate with and the leverage they have in the type of return they can get, which is why I stated in a situation like with Graves, the likely scenario is this...

    1) They get a low return on a team who will take him, i.e. maybe they get a 4th.
    2) They may have to take a contract back with a player in a similar situation, i.e. let's say VAN is interested. You could see a trade, maybe even straight up for Mikheyev.

    Now, as i stated a few times already, if Graves just completely year 2 of his contract and he's been bad in both his years of this contract? Then yes, the Pens would likely either have to tack on a pick/prospect to move him or possibly retain.
    Feb. 27 at 6:22 p.m.
    #28
    I Love J Boqvist
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jan. 2023
    Posts: 11,989
    Likes: 3,173
    Quoting: Mr_Gardoki
    Trust me when I tell you, as someone who's worked in the industry, you're wrong.


    But humour me.

    Name me a team with the cap space, the need at LD, that wouldn’t be 1 of the 12 teams on graves NTC, that wants graves at 4.5 mill that he wouldn’t sign with in the offseason at said 4.5.
    Feb. 27 at 6:22 p.m.
    #29
    Banned
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jul. 2018
    Posts: 9,687
    Likes: 4,536
    Quoting: dgibb10
    NJD decided Ryan Graves wasn’t worth 4.5 million x 6 years to them (probably even less as historically players will take less to not have to move their family)

    And unless you’re suggesting Graves took a discount to play in Pittsburgh, it’s likely that almost all of the other teams in the NHL decided the same.


    Your logic here is 100% wrong. NJ didn't decide Graves wasn't worth that. NJ decided to prioritize getting their young dmen in the lineup rather than signing an older player long-term who would block their place in the lineup, which was the right thing to do.
    Feb. 27 at 6:23 p.m.
    #30
    I Love J Boqvist
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jan. 2023
    Posts: 11,989
    Likes: 3,173
    Quoting: Mr_Gardoki
    Your general thought-process is wrong. I'm not sure why you're asking weird questions. I completely stated earlier that Graves has not been a good fit. Every situation with a player is different on why they may be on the outs with their respective teams, but you're treating this like some kind of math equation and that's now how this goes down.

    Yes, the clause affects things, but it only limits the teams they can negotiate with and the leverage they have in the type of return they can get, which is why I stated in a situation like with Graves, the likely scenario is this...

    1) They get a low return on a team who will take him, i.e. maybe they get a 4th.
    2) They may have to take a contract back with a player in a similar situation, i.e. let's say VAN is interested. You could see a trade, maybe even straight up for Mikheyev.

    Now, as i stated a few times already, if Graves just completely year 2 of his contract and he's been bad in both his years of this contract? Then yes, the Pens would likely either have to tack on a pick/prospect to move him or possibly retain.


    I could see you taking another cap dump back for graves yes.

    Again, you’ve failed to answer this simple question. If a team wanted graves at 4.5 million+, why did they not sign graves when he was available as an unrestricted free agent at said price?
    Feb. 27 at 6:24 p.m.
    #31
    I Love J Boqvist
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jan. 2023
    Posts: 11,989
    Likes: 3,173
    Quoting: Mr_Gardoki
    Your logic here is 100% wrong. NJ didn't decide Graves wasn't worth that. NJ decided to prioritize getting their young dmen in the lineup rather than signing an older player long-term who would block their place in the lineup, which was the right thing to do.


    No, that’s what they did with Severson. There was a logjam there with Nemec Casey Hamilton and Marino.

    On the left side there was no real logjam. They just decided graves wasn’t worth the money over that term.

    If NJD wanted graves at 4.5 million they’d have signed graves at 4.5 million
    Feb. 27 at 6:25 p.m.
    #32
    Banned
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jul. 2018
    Posts: 9,687
    Likes: 4,536
    Quoting: dgibb10
    No, that’s what they did with Severson. There was a logjam there with Nemec Casey Hamilton and Marino.

    On the left side there was no real logjam. They just decided graves wasn’t worth the money over that term.

    If NJD wanted graves at 4.5 million they’d have signed graves at 4.5 million


    Wrong. Being a NJD fan doesn't mean you know more than I do on this, by the way. Graves and Severson were gone to make room, but also free up cash to spend on Meier.
    Feb. 27 at 6:25 p.m.
    #33
    Banned
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jul. 2018
    Posts: 9,687
    Likes: 4,536
    Quoting: dgibb10
    I could see you taking another cap dump back for graves yes.

    Again, you’ve failed to answer this simple question. If a team wanted graves at 4.5 million+, why did they not sign graves when he was available as an unrestricted free agent at said price?


    I didn't fail to answer anything. I gave you the answer in another reply.
    Feb. 27 at 6:27 p.m.
    #34
    I Love J Boqvist
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jan. 2023
    Posts: 11,989
    Likes: 3,173
    Quoting: Mr_Gardoki
    I didn't fail to answer anything. I gave you the answer in another reply.


    I have yet to see an answer. You said something inaccurate about NJD having a logjam on the left. But again, that logjam still exists and so NJD would still not want graves at 4.5.

    Which team wanted graves at 4.5 and why didn’t they just sign him?
    Feb. 27 at 6:28 p.m.
    #35
    Banned
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jul. 2018
    Posts: 9,687
    Likes: 4,536
    Quoting: dgibb10
    I have yet to see an answer. You said something inaccurate about NJD having a logjam on the left. But again, that logjam still exists and so NJD would still not want graves at 4.5


    Here's how it played out...

    The Devils have a bevy of young dmen ready to start making their way in. Graves wanted a long-term contract and NJ didn't want to commit the time to a 2nd pairing dman when they have all these guys getting ready to make the jump.

    The other factors are Bratt and Meier. They prioritized spending their money on key forwards.

    Please though, continue to tell me how I'm not answering your questions.
    Feb. 27 at 6:32 p.m.
    #36
    Banned
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jul. 2018
    Posts: 9,687
    Likes: 4,536
    @digibb10

    Also, you have a Siegenthaler, Bahl and Hughes on the left. Young dmen. Signing Graves would have blocked your younger guys from coming up. This isn't rocket science.
    Feb. 27 at 7:58 p.m.
    #37
    I Love J Boqvist
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jan. 2023
    Posts: 11,989
    Likes: 3,173
    Quoting: Mr_Gardoki
    Here's how it played out...

    The Devils have a bevy of young dmen ready to start making their way in. Graves wanted a long-term contract and NJ didn't want to commit the time to a 2nd pairing dman when they have all these guys getting ready to make the jump.

    The other factors are Bratt and Meier. They prioritized spending their money on key forwards.

    Please though, continue to tell me how I'm not answering your questions.


    If graves was worth 4.5 million in our eyes we’d have kept him.

    For example

    Siegs-Hamilton
    Graves-Marino
    Luke-Bahl (Luke started the year on the right side, Nemec was meant to stay in the AHL this year)

    And kept Yegor instead of bringing in toffoli.

    We didn’t think Graves was worth 4.5 million.

    The problem with gravy was by the end of the year Bahl (not a top elite level prospect) was playing BETTER than graves. Hence, graves was not worth 4.5 million.
    Feb. 27 at 8:01 p.m.
    #38
    I Love J Boqvist
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jan. 2023
    Posts: 11,989
    Likes: 3,173
    Quoting: Mr_Gardoki
    digibb10

    Also, you have a Siegenthaler, Bahl and Hughes on the left. Young dmen. Signing Graves would have blocked your younger guys from coming up. This isn't rocket science.


    Bahl isn’t a top priority dman who we needed to save a spot for.

    Even now NJD is targeting a veteran dman such as Hanifin. Again, if we thought graves was worth the money we’d have kept him and either shipped out Bahl, or not bought Miller.
     
    Reply
    To create a post please Login or Register
    Question:
    Options:
    Add Option
    Submit Poll