Quoting: noted
It be tough to do at the deadline but they could probably make it work if also traded Buch or Kyrou in corresponding move and/or buried some guys
Could easily make work in offseason as cap goes up and Scandella, Kapanen, Vrana, Blais all off books.
Blues fans on here are weird. They have been asking for almost more of a return than this for what they want for Buch in some cases…
Well, there's a stigma here that Brady is similar to Matthew because he's a Tkachuk. He's a first line scorer yes, but has been worse than Kyrou defensively. We berated Kyrou for the same thing last season, and he got much better defensively (effort, backchecking etc, same issues that come up with Brady) and took a bit of a hit offensively. Now we want to trade him for what?
And no, this is wildly different than most people are asking for Buch. Dvorsky was the 10OA last draft, and our pick is extremely likely to be top 10 again. If we're trading Kyrou, Dvorsky and this years first for Brady Tkachuk or to make cap space for him, we're making a lateral move short term hoping for a better fit while mortgaging the future at the same time. it's just not a wise decision unless the move is focused around Tkachuk and Kyrou, which again, fairly lateral, but to each their own. We're a slow team that would be getting even slower (by a large margin) but we're getting closer to getting harder to play against assuming Tkachuk buys into more of a focus defensively, which most likely will result in a lower production rate. If it's a 1-1 trade sure it would make sense to see if the fit is better, but adding a top 10 pick or a top 10 pick in their d+1 or potentially even both is a ridiculously dumb idea. Neighbors emergence negates the need for this swap as he's proven to be that thorn in the side front of the net player.
I get the affinity with how beloved big walt was. But it's not a smart decision, and an unnecessary one.