SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Trade Machine Proposals

Flames collect 1st

Created by: SchlemCat
Published: Apr. 4 at 11:14 p.m.
Salary Cap: $83,500,000
Season Days: 42/192 (22%)
Central Registry Determination: This trade has met the central registry's trade checklist

Logo of the Calgary FlamesCalgary Flames

OutStatusRetained SalaryEffective Cap HitRosterSPCReserve ListDraft Rd 1Rd 2-3Rd 4-7GPGAPGAASv%
Andersson, RasmusCalgary FlamesNHL-$995,313011---7082735--
2024 3rd round pick (Logo of the Calgary FlamesCGY)---010------
InStatusRetained SalaryEffective Cap HitRosterSPCReserve ListDraft Rd 1Rd 2-3Rd 4-7GPGAPGAASv%
2024 1st round pick (Logo of the Ottawa SenatorsOTT)---100------
ChangeCap SpaceRosterSPCReserve ListDraft Rd 1Rd 2-3Rd 4-7GPGAPGAASv%
Initial$1,534,0732546645910
Change$995,313-1-1-11-10
Final$2,529,386 (↑)24 (↓)45 (↓)63 (↓)6 (↑)8 (↓)10-8-27-35

Logo of the Ottawa SenatorsOttawa Senators

OutStatusRetained SalaryEffective Cap HitRosterSPCReserve ListDraft Rd 1Rd 2-3Rd 4-7GPGAPGAASv%
2024 1st round pick (Logo of the Ottawa SenatorsOTT)---100------
InStatusRetained SalaryEffective Cap HitRosterSPCReserve ListDraft Rd 1Rd 2-3Rd 4-7GPGAPGAASv%
Andersson, RasmusCalgary FlamesNHL-$4,550,000011---7082735--
2024 3rd round pick (Logo of the Calgary FlamesCGY)---010------
ChangeCap SpaceRosterSPCReserve ListDraft Rd 1Rd 2-3Rd 4-7GPGAPGAASv%
Initial$5,516,6672349674512
Change-$4,550,000111-110
Final$966,667 (↓)24 (↑)50 (↑)68 (↑)3 (↓)6 (↑)1282735
Apr. 5 at 1:54 p.m.
#1
MoxNix
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2022
Posts: 7,567
Likes: 3,211
I think Ottawa would do that but Calgary probably wants more for Andersson. Not a whole lot more and no not Brannstrom a player or prospect Calgary has a want/need/use for.
Apr. 5 at 6:59 p.m.
#2
athrin
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 5,955
Likes: 1,557
rofl rasmus is not worth a top 10 pick, OTT declines
Apr. 5 at 8:49 p.m.
#3
Element23VM
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2022
Posts: 1,316
Likes: 440
Quoting: athrin
rofl rasmus is not worth a top 10 pick, OTT declines


Actually, it's pretty close to value... I'd say he's worth 9 to 12 choice this year... would not trade for him with a top 8 pick though...
Apr. 6 at 8:55 a.m.
#4
athrin
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 5,955
Likes: 1,557
Quoting: Element23VM
Actually, it's pretty close to value... I'd say he's worth 9 to 12 choice this year... would not trade for him with a top 8 pick though...


rasmus is worth a pick 15-32 not top 15, hes is not a top end D in the league in the likes of Makar, Hughes, Fox or Dobson
Apr. 6 at 2:46 p.m.
#5
Element23VM
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2022
Posts: 1,316
Likes: 440
Quoting: athrin
rasmus is worth a pick 15-32 not top 15, hes is not a top end D in the league in the likes of Makar, Hughes, Fox or Dobson


Makar would have cost Chicago their first last year to acquire (Bedard), Hughes, Dobson, and Fox would cost a 1OA this year to get. If you had picks 8,9,10,11, and 12 put together, you could not acquire those guys.

This year, a top 7 pick is like a top 4 pick in most other years, so they're not going anywhere... but if a team believes it's in its competitive window, it will acquire a guy like Andersson if it has like a 9OVR... if it needs a guy like Andersson.

Most relevant trade is Islanders trading for Romanov which cost them 13OVR. Andersson's status is higher than Romanov's right now, on top of his being extremely affordable and with term left.
SchlemCat liked this.
Apr. 6 at 6:19 p.m.
#6
athrin
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 5,955
Likes: 1,557
Quoting: Element23VM
Makar would have cost Chicago their first last year to acquire (Bedard), Hughes, Dobson, and Fox would cost a 1OA this year to get. If you had picks 8,9,10,11, and 12 put together, you could not acquire those guys.

This year, a top 7 pick is like a top 4 pick in most other years, so they're not going anywhere... but if a team believes it's in its competitive window, it will acquire a guy like Andersson if it has like a 9OVR... if it needs a guy like Andersson.

Most relevant trade is Islanders trading for Romanov which cost them 13OVR. Andersson's status is higher than Romanov's right now, on top of his being extremely affordable and with term left.


no freaking team is going to give up a top 10 pick for rasmus, what other teams paid for other players has ZERO to do with what a team will give up for rasmus. just because lou was dumb enough to give up 13th for Romanov don't mean a GM will give up a top 10 pick for rasmus.
Apr. 6 at 7:20 p.m.
#7
Element23VM
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2022
Posts: 1,316
Likes: 440
Quoting: athrin
no freaking team is going to give up a top 10 pick for rasmus, what other teams paid for other players has ZERO to do with what a team will give up for rasmus. just because lou was dumb enough to give up 13th for Romanov don't mean a GM will give up a top 10 pick for rasmus.


Lou's stupid for picking up a 2-3 D with a pick which... you HOPE ONE DAY can get a 2-3 D with? He could have used that pick to draft legendary D like Brandon Gormley, or Jakub Zboril, or Jake Bean...

No, no, I'm sure he needed that pick to draft Frank Nazar, who might one day be a middle six forward who has power play utility, ranking at best top 40 to 50 at his position.

Instead, he gets currently one of the best minute chewing D in the league.
SchlemCat liked this.
Apr. 6 at 8:35 p.m.
#8
penguinswin
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2021
Posts: 1,128
Likes: 379
Quoting: Element23VM
Lou's stupid for picking up a 2-3 D with a pick which... you HOPE ONE DAY can get a 2-3 D with? He could have used that pick to draft legendary D like Brandon Gormley, or Jakub Zboril, or Jake Bean...

No, no, I'm sure he needed that pick to draft Frank Nazar, who might one day be a middle six forward who has power play utility, ranking at best top 40 to 50 at his position.

Instead, he gets currently one of the best minute chewing D in the league.

👏👏👏
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll