ROUND 1 | TEAM | ORIGINAL | PLAYER | DETAILS |
---|
1 | - | Because I feel bad for sens fans | ||
2 | - | BPA | ||
3 | - | Some of the other defensemen available have greater upside, but I don't think any have a higher floor. | ||
4 | - | BPA and fills a positional need | ||
5 | - | I could see Eiserman falling as low as the mid-teens but also could see some teams including CBJ being very high on him. | ||
6 | - | Not the BPA, but AZ seems to covet size and isn't afraid of the Russian factor, based on their selections in previous years (Levshunov, But, Lamoureux) | ||
7 | - | BPA. Montreal doesn't especially need more RHD prospects but Parekh has the upside to be the best player in this draft and is a clear notch above the next best forward prospects. | ||
8 | - | Too great of a storyline | ||
9 | - | BPA | ||
10 | - | BPA | ||
11 | - | BPA | ||
12 | - | BPA and positional need. Lindstrom could go higher but I feel like he wouldn't be in the top-5 conversation if there wasn't such a dearth of big centres in the first round | ||
13 | - | Most talented player available | ||
14 | - | Most talented player available | ||
15 | - | PHI could grab a defenseman with this pick, but I think they gamble that there will still be some good options available when they make their second pick | ||
16 | BPA and absolute steal if he falls to 16 | |||
17 | - | A bit of a reach but Lou isn't afraid of making off the board picks. Sennecke is a really intriguing prospect with some big upside. Could end up being the steal of the draft. | ||
18 | - | BPA and positional need | ||
19 | - | BPA | ||
20 | - | BPA with the kind of size Vegas covets | ||
21 | - | Toss-up between Hemming and the next three available wingers. Really comes down to team preference. | ||
22 | CHI goes with the winger with highest upside after making a safe pick at #3 | |||
23 | - | BPA | ||
24 | BPA | |||
25 | BFGA (Best French Guy Available) | |||
26 | Tossup between Mews, Elick, and Emery | |||
27 | - | COL drafts the best defenseman available | ||
28 | Hutson's upside is too tantalizing for CGY to pass-up | |||
29 | - | BPA | ||
30 | - | BPA | ||
31 | Safe D selection | |||
32 | - | BPA. Would probably go higher if he wasn't Russian |
ROUND 2 | TEAM | ORIGINAL | PLAYER | DETAILS |
---|
33 | - | |||
34 | - | No-brainer taking Bedard's linemate in Regina | ||
35 | - | BPA | ||
36 | Would be a great fit in Philly | |||
37 | - | Dark-horse prospect who hasn't got a ton of attention this year | ||
38 | Jett to the Jets | |||
39 | - | Ottawa can afford to make a high risk high reward pick if they do somehow win the lottery | ||
40 | - | |||
41 | - | |||
42 | ||||
43 | - | |||
44 | - | |||
45 | - | |||
46 | ||||
47 | ||||
48 | - | |||
49 | - | |||
50 | - | |||
51 | - | |||
52 | - | |||
54 | ||||
55 | ||||
56 | ||||
57 | - | |||
58 | ||||
59 | ||||
60 | ||||
61 | ||||
62 | - | |||
63 | ||||
64 | ||||
65 |
ROUND 3 | TEAM | ORIGINAL | PLAYER | DETAILS |
---|
66 | ||||
67 | - | |||
68 | - | |||
69 | - | |||
70 | - | |||
71 | - | |||
72 | ||||
73 | - | |||
74 | - | |||
75 | - | |||
76 | - | |||
77 | - | |||
78 | ||||
79 | - | |||
80 | ||||
81 | - | |||
82 | ||||
83 | - | |||
84 | ||||
85 | ||||
86 | - | |||
87 | ||||
88 | ||||
89 | ||||
90 | ||||
91 | - | |||
92 | ||||
93 | - | |||
94 | ||||
95 | - | |||
96 | ||||
97 |