SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Break the Drought

Created by: BuffaloSoldier55
Team: 2024-25 Buffalo Sabres
Initial Creation Date: Apr. 10, 2024
Published: Apr. 10, 2024
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
Find suitors for your RFA's
Find a Top 6 Winger (Canes can't sign all their Top forwards back?)
Rebuild your bottom 6 (Especially 3/4C) (Overspend for NY Taxes on Duhaime/Stephenson)
Arvidsson prove it (following injury season)
Vet Dman (Shatty overspend for NY Taxes)
Free Agent Signings
RESERVE LISTYEARSCAP HIT
2$775,000
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
3$4,000,000
4$6,250,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
3$3,330,000
3$2,500,000
1$4,000,000
1$2,000,000
1$1,000,000
Trades
1.
BUF
  1. 2024 2nd round pick (DAL)
CGY
  1. Krebs, Peyton [RFA Rights]
2.
BUF
  1. Necas, Martin [RFA Rights]
CAR
  1. Greenway, Jordan
  2. Jokiharju, Henri [RFA Rights]
  3. 2024 1st round pick (BUF)
  4. 2025 2nd round pick (BUF)
3.
BUF
  1. 2025 4th round pick (SEA)
SEA
  1. Bryson, Jacob [RFA Rights]
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2024
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the DAL
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the PHI
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the FLA
2025
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the SEA
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the NSH
Logo of the WSH
2026
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
22$87,700,000$87,186,070$0$2,500,000$513,930

Roster

Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$855,833$855,833
LW, RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$7,142,857$7,142,857
C
M-NTC
UFA - 6
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$4,750,000$4,750,000
RW, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
RW, LW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$7,100,000$7,100,000
C, LW
UFA - 6
$6,250,000$6,250,000
RW
RFA
$4,000,000$4,000,000
RW, LW
UFA
$3,330,000$3,330,000
C, LW
UFA
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$9,000,000$9,000,000
LW, RW
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$950,000$950,000 (Performance Bonus$650,000$650K)
LW
RFA - 2
$1,000,000$1,000,000
C, RW
UFA
$2,500,000$2,500,000
RW, LW
UFA
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$775,000$775,000
RW
RFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$3,850,000$3,850,000
LD/RD
RFA - 1
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$11,000,000$11,000,000
LD/RD
UFA - 8
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$4,000,000$4,000,000
G
RFA
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$8,350,000$8,350,000
LD/RD
UFA - 7
$2,000,000$2,000,000
RD
UFA
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$1,000,000$1M)
G
RFA - 1
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$4,285,714$4,285,714
LD
UFA - 6
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$3,333,333$3,333,333
RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$925,000$925,000
LD
RFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Apr. 10 at 3:24 p.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2023
Posts: 1,088
Likes: 385
A 2nd sounds steep for Krebs, even a late 2nd
Apr. 10 at 4:32 p.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2023
Posts: 5,682
Likes: 3,754
Quoting: Shaun80
A 2nd sounds steep for Krebs, even a late 2nd


Which is why we won’t trade him
No reason to “sell low” on him right now

Maybe he ends up in a package for someone,
but even that’s doubtful imo
Apr. 10 at 4:36 p.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2023
Posts: 5,682
Likes: 3,754
The Shattenkirk signing made me throw up in my mouth

And you’re really reaching with A LOT of the rest of these moves- ESPECIALLY the Stevenson signing at only 3.3mil
He might end up making double that per season
BuffaloSoldier55 liked this.
Apr. 10 at 5:14 p.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2022
Posts: 2,072
Likes: 1,382
Quoting: AntiAnalytics
Which is why we won’t trade him
No reason to “sell low” on him right now

Maybe he ends up in a package for someone,
but even that’s doubtful imo


Granato is not "fixing" Krebs
Apr. 10 at 5:47 p.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2023
Posts: 5,682
Likes: 3,754
Quoting: Czu8iks
Granato is not "fixing" Krebs


1- i didn’t say ANYTHING at all like that he would

2- BUT, Krebs isn’t “broken” anyways
sabres89 liked this.
Apr. 10 at 6:09 p.m.
#6
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2017
Posts: 8,273
Likes: 6,247
Quoting: AntiAnalytics
1- i didn’t say ANYTHING at all like that he would

2- BUT, Krebs isn’t “broken” anyways


Look, I defended Krebs for a long time. I said "maybe he will be a good two way player, with grit, and a bottom 6 center that does that could help us win". Moving mittelstadt gave him his chance to show what he can do, and he didn't do much with it. We still need a 3c that can take d zone starts and win draws, and if he can't do it, like now, I would definitely look at what we could get for him. I don't know if we could get a second for him, but if we could, I would take that second and go shopping for stuff to fix this roster.
Apr. 10 at 7:43 p.m.
#7
Lets Get Kraken
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2021
Posts: 8,668
Likes: 3,484
If Necas was going to sign that, Canes just keep him. It’s not like that would be enough anyway. Canes have the cap space to resign Jarvis, Guentzel, and Necas, so why wouldn’t they? You are attempting to buy from a contender that currently has no incentive to trade Necas. Unless the Canes demands are met, Necas isn’t likely to be moved unless the Canes are packaging Necas for an upgrade.
AntiAnalytics liked this.
Apr. 10 at 8:06 p.m.
#8
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2023
Posts: 5,682
Likes: 3,754
Quoting: sabres89
Look, I defended Krebs for a long time. I said "maybe he will be a good two way player, with grit, and a bottom 6 center that does that could help us win". Moving mittelstadt gave him his chance to show what he can do, and he didn't do much with it. We still need a 3c that can take d zone starts and win draws, and if he can't do it, like now, I would definitely look at what we could get for him. I don't know if we could get a second for him, but if we could, I would take that second and go shopping for stuff to fix this roster.


And u think 15games is enough of a sample size to make ANY kind of reasonable assessment whatsoever???
Come on now….

Just bc Krebs can’t win faceoffs, it doesn’t mean he can’t be a useful player
sabres89 liked this.
Apr. 10 at 8:44 p.m.
#9
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2017
Posts: 8,273
Likes: 6,247
Quoting: AntiAnalytics
And u think 15games is enough of a sample size to make ANY kind of reasonable assessment whatsoever???
Come on now….

Just bc Krebs can’t win faceoffs, it doesn’t mean he can’t be a useful player


3c is a trouble spot for our team. Thompson is awful defensively, and cozens doesn't play awesome in his own end either (still hopeful though). That means there isn't much to lean on from the top two lines. So if Krebs can't take the job and own it, how much time do you give him? I'm not blaming Krebs for 13 years of no playoffs, but next year can't be hoping that he can play an important role. Hope is not a plan.
Apr. 10 at 11:24 p.m.
#10
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2023
Posts: 5,682
Likes: 3,754
Quoting: sabres89
3c is a trouble spot for our team. Thompson is awful defensively, and cozens doesn't play awesome in his own end either (still hopeful though). That means there isn't much to lean on from the top two lines. So if Krebs can't take the job and own it, how much time do you give him? I'm not blaming Krebs for 13 years of no playoffs, but next year can't be hoping that he can play an important role. Hope is not a plan.


Krebs doesn’t have to be Bergeron either though
Given some decent linemates (Girgs, & Okposo especially, both had pretty bad drop offs in play this season) it’s still reasonable to PROJECT- not “hope” - than Krebs takes a step forward in his development
How long was it before we started seeing what we wanted outta Mitts ?

And Krebs might not have it,
but he’s earned more of a shot than 15 games

I’m not opposed to bringing someone in,
but I’m not the GM

Krebs is most likely gonna get a legit shot to prove himself
sabres89 liked this.
Apr. 11 at 8:10 a.m.
#11
Thread Starter
BuffaloSoldier55
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2024
Posts: 36
Likes: 8
Quoting: AntiAnalytics
The Shattenkirk signing made me throw up in my mouth

And you’re really reaching with A LOT of the rest of these moves- ESPECIALLY the Stevenson signing at only 3.3mil
He might end up making double that per season


Need a backend Right handed defenseman that is not scared of a corner like Bryson.
Noted on Stevenson - didn't realize he is projected 5.5-6mil.
Apr. 11 at 8:13 a.m.
#12
Thread Starter
BuffaloSoldier55
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2024
Posts: 36
Likes: 8
Quoting: evelutions2
If Necas was going to sign that, Canes just keep him. It’s not like that would be enough anyway. Canes have the cap space to resign Jarvis, Guentzel, and Necas, so why wouldn’t they? You are attempting to buy from a contender that currently has no incentive to trade Necas. Unless the Canes demands are met, Necas isn’t likely to be moved unless the Canes are packaging Necas for an upgrade.


Canes have a lot of work to do this summer.
Teräväinen, Guentzel, Jarvis, Drury, Noosen, Martinook (wears an A) and Necas.
The Necas move is a numbers move, they going to keep everyone?
Apr. 11 at 9:24 a.m.
#13
On the Rod Meal Plan
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2023
Posts: 526
Likes: 315
Quoting: Bunk55
Canes have a lot of work to do this summer.
Teräväinen, Guentzel, Jarvis, Drury, Noosen, Martinook (wears an A) and Necas.
The Necas move is a numbers move, they going to keep everyone?


The order of resigning goes: Guentzel, Necas, Turbo, Jarvis (non arb RFA so we can take our time with him), Drury, Noesen, Martinook. At least if I were the FO. Guentzel might also not want to resign here, he is a UFA after all, so if he ends up walking then there's really no reason to let Necas walk.

All that said, take Greenway and the second out of the trade and I think it's probably a fair trade. Whether the Canes go for it is another question as other Canes fans have pointed out.
Apr. 11 at 12:18 p.m.
#14
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2023
Posts: 5,682
Likes: 3,754
Quoting: Bunk55
Need a backend Right handed defenseman that is not scared of a corner like Bryson.
Noted on Stevenson - didn't realize he is projected 5.5-6mil.


Shattenkirk is old & has been well past his prime for a while now. Plus, he probably shouldn’t play above the 3rd pair
He’s also much more effective in the offensive zone than his own zone- he’s never actually been all that great at “defense”
He’s been overrated his whole career
Apr. 11 at 5:04 p.m.
#15
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2022
Posts: 2,072
Likes: 1,382
Quoting: AntiAnalytics
1- i didn’t say ANYTHING at all like that he would

2- BUT, Krebs isn’t “broken” anyways


If Granat stays, which I assume he will, Krebs is broken. He is out of ELC, showed no progress last season and a half, even with extended roster bump to 3C. If other team wants this reclamation project, ship him for 3rd and be done.

Sabres need to refresh bottom half of the roster anyways
Apr. 11 at 6:00 p.m.
#16
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2023
Posts: 5,682
Likes: 3,754
Quoting: Czu8iks
If Granat stays, which I assume he will, Krebs is broken. He is out of ELC, showed no progress last season and a half, even with extended roster bump to 3C. If other team wants this reclamation project, ship him for 3rd and be done.

Sabres need to refresh bottom half of the roster anyways


Wow, this is just flat out wrong
15games or so does NOT COUNT as an “extended roster bump to 3C”

Sorry, but that’s one of the dumbest things I’ve ever read on here

Whether u like it or not, Adams is likely to give Krebs a REAL SHOT at the 3C role
Apr. 11 at 6:13 p.m.
#17
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2022
Posts: 2,072
Likes: 1,382
Quoting: AntiAnalytics
Wow, this is just flat out wrong
15games or so does NOT COUNT as an “extended roster bump to 3C”

Sorry, but that’s one of the dumbest things I’ve ever read on here

Whether u like it or not, Adams is likely to give Krebs a REAL SHOT at the 3C role


How come 15 games with Skinner and Greenway/Peterka with little to nothing production are not enough to prove, Sabres need to move on from Krebs.
Apr. 11 at 6:17 p.m.
#18
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2023
Posts: 5,682
Likes: 3,754
Quoting: Czu8iks
How come 15 games with Skinner and Greenway/Peterka with little to nothing production are not enough to prove, Sabres need to move on from Krebs.


A 15game sample size isn’t enough to prove ANYTHING
With that type of thinking, we’d have moved on from Mitts WAY BEFORE he developed into the the asset that got us
Byram

Not every player develops by age 22
And we sure didn’t put him in a good spot to develop,
asking him to take on tough assignments with Okposo’s old a$$ on one wing & the great Girgensons on the other
And that was pretty much all of last year & most of this year

AGAIN….
whether u like it or not, Adams is probably gonna give him a real shot at 3C next year
Apr. 11 at 6:26 p.m.
#19
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2022
Posts: 2,072
Likes: 1,382
Quoting: AntiAnalytics
A 15game sample size isn’t enough to prove ANYTHING
With that type of thinking, we’d have moved on from Mitts WAY BEFORE he developed into the the asset that got us
Byram

Not every player develops by age 22
And we sure didn’t put him in a good spot to develop,
asking him to take on tough assignments with Okposo’s old a$$ on one wing & the great Girgensons on the other
And that was pretty much all of last year & most of this year

AGAIN….
whether u like it or not, Adams is probably gonna give him a real shot at 3C next year


But he`s got no room to grow on this roster. He is not better than Cozens and Thompson in any aspect of the hockey. He could be better than 4C centering boat anchors in Okposo and Girgensons.
He showed no improvement after being move from them. There are Savoie and Kulich waiting for roster spot, and you dont want them to put behind Krebs or with Girgensons/Okposo 25/26 equivalent.

You will eventually trade Jokiharju and/or Rosen for bottom 6 forward, hopefully better than Krebs.
Apr. 11 at 6:58 p.m.
#20
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2023
Posts: 5,682
Likes: 3,754
Quoting: Czu8iks
But he`s got no room to grow on this roster. He is not better than Cozens and Thompson in any aspect of the hockey. He could be better than 4C centering boat anchors in Okposo and Girgensons.
He showed no improvement after being move from them. There are Savoie and Kulich waiting for roster spot, and you dont want them to put behind Krebs or with Girgensons/Okposo 25/26 equivalent.

You will eventually trade Jokiharju and/or Rosen for bottom 6 forward, hopefully better than Krebs.


This type of thinking simply does not make sense

U can’t put someone in a defensive center role, for 1 & 3/4 seasons, playing with “boat anchors” (your words) and then
just expect him to flip the switch right away when thrust into
a completely different role- with brand new linemates to get used to & find a connection with- even if they are more talented.
Chemistry matters. And it’s hard to be confident in a new role right away that is brand new to him in the NHL


He doesn’t need to overtake Tage or Cozens either
Mittelstadt was able to grow & develop into a good player with them anchored in the top 2 center spots
Krebs just turned 23 dude, he’s still VERY young


And here’s the thing you’re gonna have to realize
Even if u did convince me- u haven’t btw- that just doesn’t matter at all
I’m not the one making the decisions, Adams is
And it seems as if Adams is gonna give him a shot at 3C

He’s shown nothing but patience with our young talent
So shipping him out for a 3rd (essentially nothing) would be a very surprising move
Czu8iks liked this.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll